Skip to main content

What Kind of Cooperation Is Required by Situated Agents? The Principle of Situated Cooperation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Active Media Technology (AMT 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2252))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 655 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of cooperation in computer science has a strong rational connotation. A cooperative system is composed of cognitive individuals which have explicit knowledge about their users and other individuals of the group, have propositional attitudes, and are capable of negotiating agreements and making contracts. We are concerned with the design of cooperative robots; and the traditional conception of cooperation is not easily applicable to Robotics not only because of the limitations of Robotics but also because the traditional concept of cooperation does not explain its own pre-requisites and hypotheses. This paper outlines the concept of situated cooperation in the context of situated agents, particularly robots.

The research described in this paper is supported by a grant of the Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris 6, under the inter-themes collaboration contracts 1999. The first author is supported by CONACYT/SFERE, contract number 70359.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chaib-draa B. Industrial Applications of Distributed AI. In: Readings in Agents, Huhns M.N., Singh M.P. (eds). Morgan Kauffmann, USA (1998) 31–35

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drogoul A., Picault S. MICRobES: vers des collectivités des robots socialement situés. In: Actes des 7èmes Journées Francophones sur l’Intelligence Artificielle Distribuée et les Systèmes Multi-Agents, Gleizes M.P., Marcenac (eds). Hermès, Paris (1999) 265–277

    Google Scholar 

  4. Durfee E.H., Kiskis D.L., Birmingham W.P. The Agent Architecture of the University of Michigan Digital Library. In: Readings in Agents, Huhns M.N., Singh M.P. (eds) Morgan Kauffmann, USA (1998) 98–108

    Google Scholar 

  5. Etzioni O., Weld D. A Softbot-Based Interface to the Internet. In: Communications of ACM, July’94. ACM Press. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garbis C., Waern Y. Team coordination and communication in a rescue command staff. The role of public representations. Public artefacts in rescue training. In: Le Travail Humain, Special Issue on Human-Machine Cooperation. 62(3) (1999) 273–291

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg J. Les sociétés animales. Delachaux et niestlé, Lausanne-Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kube C.R., Bonabeau E.: Cooperative transport by ants and robots. Dans: Robotics and Autonomous Systems. Elsevier Science (2000) 85–101

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mataric M., Nilsson M., Simsarian K.T. Cooperative Multi-Robot Box-Pushing. In: Proceeding IROS-95. Pittsburgh, PA (1995) 556–561

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer J.A., Guillot A. Simulation of Adaptive Behavior in animats: Review and Prospect. In: From animals to animats. Proceedings of the First Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Meyer J.A., Wilson S.W. (eds). MIT Press, USA. (1991) 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muñoz A., Drogoul A. Towards the Design of Self-Vigilant Robots using a Principle of Situated Cooperation. In: Proceedings of the RoboCup Rescue Workshop. ICMAS 2000. Boston, Mass. USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muñoz A.: Cooperation in Collective Robotics. In: Proceedings of ACAI’01, Student Sessions. ACAI’01 Prague Cz. (2001) 64–71

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanholm T., Lesser V. Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Framework. In: Readings in Agents, Huhns M.N., Singh M.P. (eds). Morgan Kauffmann, USA (1998) 66–73

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stillwell D.J., Bay J.S. Toward the Development of a MaterialTransport System using Swarms of Ant-like Robots. In: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1. IEEE Computer Society Press, USA (1993) 766–771

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sycara K. Multiagent Systems. In: AI Magazine. Summer 1998. AAAI Press, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yamada S., Saito J. Adaptive Action Selection without Explicit Communication for Multirobot Box-pushing. In: 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muñoz-Meléndez, A., Drogoul, A. (2001). What Kind of Cooperation Is Required by Situated Agents? The Principle of Situated Cooperation. In: Liu, J., Yuen, P.C., Li, Ch., Ng, J., Ishida, T. (eds) Active Media Technology. AMT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2252. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45336-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45336-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43035-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45336-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics