Skip to main content

Diagrammatic Acquisition of Functional Knowledge for Product Configuration Systems with the Unified Modeling Language

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theory and Application of Diagrams (Diagrams 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1889))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Shorter product cycles, lower prices of products, and the production of goods that are tailored to the customers needs made knowledge based product configuration systems a great success of AI technology. However, configuration knowledge bases tend to become large and complex. Therefore, knowledge acquisition and maintenance are crucial phases in the life-cycle of a configuration system. We will show how to meet this challenge by extending a standard design language from the area of Software Engineering with classical description concepts for expressing configuration knowledge. We automatically translate this graphical depiction into logical sentences which can be exploited by a general inference engine to solve the configuration task. In order to cope with usability restrictions of diagrammatic notations for large applications, we introduce the usage of contextual diagrams. This mechanism makes the conceptual model more readable and understandable and supports intuitively the acquisition of functional configuration knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. E. Barker and D. E. O’Connor. Expert systems for configuration at Digital: XCON and beyond. Communications of the ACM, 32,3:298–318, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Chandrasekaran. Functional Representation: A Brief Historical Perspective. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Functional Reasoning, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. M. Delisle and M. D. Schwartz. Contexts-a partitioning concept for hypertext. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 5,2:168–186, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Feldkamp, M. Heinrich, and K. D. Meyer Gramann. SyDeR System Design for Reusability. AI EDAM Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 12,4, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Felfernig, G. Friedrich, and D. Jannach. UML as domain specific language for the construction of knowledge-based configuration systems. In Proceedings of SEKE‘99, pages 337–345, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Fleischanderl and A. Haselböck. Thoughts on partitioning large scale configuration problems. AAAI-96 Fall Symposium on Configuration, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Fleischanderl, A. Haselböck, H. Schreiner, M. Stumptner, and G. Friedrich. Configuring Large Systems Using Generative Constraint Satisfaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Configuration-Getting it right, July/Aug, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Friedrich and M. Stumptner. Consistency-Based Configuration. In AAAI Workshop on Configuration, Technical Report WS-99-05, pages 35–40, Orlando, Florida, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. V. Guha. Contexts: A Formalization and Some Applications. PhD thesis, Also published as technical report STAN-CS-91-1399-Thesis, Stanford University, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Haag. Sales configuration in Business Processes. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Configuration-Getting it right, July/Aug, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Heinrich and E. W. Jüngst. A resource-based paradigm for the configuring of technical systems from modular components. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on AI applications (CAIA), pages 257–264, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. J. PineII, B. Victor, and A. C. Boynton. Making Mass Customization Work. Harvard Business Review, Sep/Oct, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. John McCarthy. Notes on Formalizing Context. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI93), Chambery, Frankreich, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. L. McGuinness and J. R. Wright. Conceptual Modelling for Configuration: A Description Logic-based Approach. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Special Issue: Configuration Design, 12,4:333–344, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Mittal and F. Frayman. Towards a Generic Model of Configuration Tasks. In Proceedings of the 11th IJCAI, pages 1395–1401, Detroit, MI, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Stumptner, A. Haselböck, and G. Friedrich. ”Cocos: 1994, A Tool for Constraint-Based, Dynamic Configuration”. Proceedings 10th Conf. AI for Applications, 10,2:373–380, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Object Management Group (OMG). XMI Specification. http://www.omg.org , 1999.

  18. H. Peltonen, T. Männistö, T. Soininen, J. Tiihonen, A. Martio, and R. Sulonen. Concepts for Modeling Configurable Products. In Proceedings of European Conference Product Data Technology Days, pages 189–196, Sandhurst, UK, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. T. Runkel, A. Balkany, and W. P. Birmingham. Generating non-brittle Configuration-design Tools. Proceedings Artificial Intelligence in Design 94, pages 183–200, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Sabin and E. C. Freuder. Configuration as Composite Constraint Satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing Research Planning Workshop, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Stumptner. An overview of knowledge-based configuration. AI Communications, 10,2:111–126, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Manos Theodorakis, Anastasia Analyti, Panos Constantopoulos, and Nikos Spyratos. Context in information bases. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS’98), pages 260–270, New York City, NY, USA, August 1998. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Timo Soininen et. al. Towards a General Ontology of Configuration. AIEDAM, 12,4:357–372, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Yu and H. J. Skovgaard. A configuration tool to increase product competitiveness. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13,1:34–41, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Felfernig, A., Zanker, M. (2000). Diagrammatic Acquisition of Functional Knowledge for Product Configuration Systems with the Unified Modeling Language. In: Anderson, M., Cheng, P., Haarslev, V. (eds) Theory and Application of Diagrams. Diagrams 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1889. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44590-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44590-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67915-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44590-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics