Skip to main content

Experimental Verification of Deposition Models for Automotive Painting with Electrostatic Rotating Bell Atomizers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental Robotics VIII

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics ((STAR,volume 5))

Abstract

This paper documents the development, validation, and refinement of analytic deposition models for automotive spray painting, based largely on experimental work conducted in conjunction with the Ford Motor Company. This work, part of a larger ongoing collaborative effort with the Ford Motor Company, has the goal of developing practical and efficient trajectory planning tools for automotive painting. Our efforts thus far have led to the development of analytic deposition models for the widely used electrostatic rotating bell (ESRB) atomizers. Unlike earlier trajectory planning tools, which rely on conventional deposition models that do not capture the complexity of deposition patterns generated by ESRB atomizers, the models presented in this paper take into account both the surface curvature and the deposition pattern of ESRB atomizers. These deposition models enable our planning tools to evaluate trajectories with respect to several measures of quality, such as coating uniformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kevin R. J. Ellwood and J. Braslaw. A Finite-Element Model for an Electrostatic Bell Sprayer. Journal of Electrostatics, Vol. 45(1), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaa A. Elmoursi. Electrical Characterization of Bell-Type Electrostatic Painting Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 28(5), October 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hua Huang and Ming-Chai Lai. Simulation of Spray Transport from Rotary Cup Atomizer using KIVA-3V. In ICLASS 2000, Pasadena, California, USA, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob Braslaw. personal communication, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Suk-Hwan Suh, In-Kee Woo, and Sung-Kee Noh. Development of An Automated Trajectory Planning System (ATPS) for Spray Painting Robots. In IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Sacremento, California, USA, April 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naoki Asakawa and Yoshimi Takeuchi. Teachless Spray-Painting of Sculptured Surface by an Industrial Robot. In IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, April 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weihua Sheng, Ning Xi, Mumin Song, Yifan Chen, and Perry MacNeille. Automated CAD-Guided Robot Path Planning for Spray Painting of Compound Surfaces. In IEEE/RSJ Int’l. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramanujam Ramabhadran and John K. Antonio. Fast Solution Techniques for a Class of Optimal Trajectory Planning Problems with Applications to Automated Spray Coating. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 13(4), August 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eckhard Freund, Dirk Rokossa, and Jürgen Roßmann. Process-Oriented Approach to an Efficient Off-line Programming of Industrial Robots. In IECON’ 98: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, volume 1, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. A. Sahir and Tuna Balkan. Process Modeling, Simulation, and Paint Thickness Measurement for Robotic Spray Painting. Journal of Robotic Systems, Vol. 17(9), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peter Hertling, Lars Høg, Rune Larsen, John W. Perram, and Henrik Gordon Petersen. Task Curve Planning for Painting Robots —Part I: Process Modeling and Calibration. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 12(2), April 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David C. Conner, Prasad N. Atkar, Alfred A. Rizzi, and Howie Choset. Deposition Modeling for Paint Application on Surfaces Embedded in ℝ3. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-02-08, Carnegie Mellon, Robotics Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Conner, D.C., Atkar, P.N., Rizzi, A.A., Choset, H. (2003). Experimental Verification of Deposition Models for Automotive Painting with Electrostatic Rotating Bell Atomizers. In: Siciliano, B., Dario, P. (eds) Experimental Robotics VIII. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36268-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36268-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00305-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36268-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics