Abstract
This paper begins a process of building a semantic framework to link the many diverse interface notations that are used in more formal communities of HCI. The focus in this paper is on scenarios -single traces of user behaviour. These form a point of contact between approaches with very different models of interface abstractions or mechanisms. The paper looks first at discrete time models as these are more prevalent. Even here there are substantive issues to be addressed concerning different interpretations of timing that become apparent when you relate behaviour from different models/notations. Ubiquitous interaction, virtual reality and rich media all involve aspects of more continuous interaction and the relevant models are briefly reviewed. Because of their closer match to the real world, they differ less in terms of ontological features of behaviour.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Abowd. Formal aspects of human computer interaction, PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, 1991.
G. Abowd, H. Wang, and A. Monk. A formal technique for automated dialogue development. In Proc. DIS’95. ACM Press, 1995. pp. 219–226.
H. Alexander, Formally-based tools and techniques for human-computer dialogues. Ellis Horwood, 1987.
J. Allen. Planning as Temporal Reasoning. In Proc., 2nd Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
M. Bacigalupi. Designing movement in interactive multimedia: making it meaningful. Interfaces 44, Autumn 2000, pp. 12–15.
P. Barnard, J. May, D. Duke and D. Duce. Systems, Interactions, and Macrotheory. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2000. 7(2):222–262.
S. Card, T. Moran, and A. Newell (1993). The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. 1983, Lawrence Erlbaum.
J. Carroll (ed). Scenario-Based Design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, 1995.
J. Coutaz. PAC, an object oriented model for dialogue design. In: H-J Bullinger B. Shackel (eds) In INTERACT’87. Elsevier 1987. pp 431–436.
A. Dix. The myth of the infinitely fast machine. In Proc. HCI’87, D. Diaper and R. Winder (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 1987. pp. 215–228.
A. Dix and C. Runciman. Abstract models of interactive systems. In Proc. HCI’85. Cambridge University Press, 1985. pp. 13–22.
A. Dix. Formal Methods for Interactive Systems. Academic Press, 1991.
A. Dix. Status and events: static and dynamic properties of interactive systems. in Proceedings of the Eurographics Seminar: Formal Methods in Computer Graphics. Marina di Carrara, Italy. 1991.
A. Dix and G. Abowd, Modelling status and event behaviour of interactive systems. Software Engineering Journal, 1996. 11(6):334–346.
A. Dix. LADA-A logic for the analysis of distributed action, in Interactive Systems: Design, Specification and Verification (1st Eurographics Workshop, Bocca di Magra, Italy, June 1994), F. Paternó (ed). Springer Verlag, 1995. pp. 317–332.
P. Dourish. Embodied Interaction. ACM Press, 2001.
C. Gram and G. Cockton (eds.). Design Principles for Interactive Software. Chapman and Hall, 1996.
D. Gregory. Geographical Imaginations. Blackwell, 1994.
R. Grossman et al. (eds). Hybrid Systems. LNCS 736, Springer Verlag, 1993.
D. Kieras and P. Polson, An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1985. 22:365–394.
M. Kutar, C. Britton and C. Nehaniv. Specifying multiple time granularities in interactive systems. In DSV-IS’2000. P. Palanque and F. Paternó (eds). LNCS 1946, Springer, 2001, pp. 169–190.
K. Loer and M. Harrison. Formal interactive systems analysis and usability inspection methods: two incompatible worlds? In DSV-IS’2000. P. Palanque and F. Paternó (eds). LNCS 1946, Springer, 2001, pp. 169–190.
A. Monk. Action-effect rules: a technique for evaluating an informal specification against principles. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1990. 9(2):147–155.
M. Massink, D. Duke and S. Smith. Towards hybrid interface specification for virtual environments. In DSV-IS’99. D. Duke and A. Puerta (eds). Springer, 1999, pp. 30–51.
D. Navarre. P. Palanque, F. Paternó, C. Santoro and R. Bastide. A tool suite for integrating task and system models through scenarios. In DSV-IS’2001. C. Johnson (ed). LNCS 2220, Springer, 2001, pp. 88–113.
P. Palanque and F. Paternó (eds). Formal Methods in Human Computer Interaction. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
F. Paternó and G. Faconti. On the use of LOTOS to describe graphical interaction. in Proceedings of HCI’92. Cambridge University Press, 1992. p. 155–173.
F. Paternó. Formal reasoning about dialogue properties with automatic support. Interacting with Computers. August 1997, pp. 173–196.
F. Paternó. Model-based design and evaluation of interactive applications. Springer, 1999.
F. Paternó and C. Santoro. Integrating model checking and HCI tools to help designers verify user interface properties. In DSV-IS’2000. P. Palanque and F. Paternó (eds). LNCS 1946, Springer, 2001, pp. 135–150.
F. Paternó, G. Mori and R. Galimberti. CTTE: an environment for analysis and development of task models of cooperative applications. In Proceedings of CHI’01, Vol 2, ACM Press, 2001.
S. Payne. Understanding Calendar Use. Human-Computer Interaction, 1993, 8(2):83–100.
G. Pfa., and P. Hagen (eds). Seeheim Workshop on User Interface Management Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1985.
S. Payne and T. Green, Task action grammars: a model of mental representation of task language. Human-Computer Interaction, 1986, 2(2):93–133.
P. Reisner. Formal grammar and human factors design of an interactive graphics system. IEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1981. 7(2):229–240.
C. Roast and J. Siddiqi. Using the template model to analyse directory visualisation. Interacting with Computers. 1997, 9(2):155–172.
A. Shepherd. Task analysis as a framework for examining HCI tasks, in Perspectives on HCI: Diverse Approaches, A. Monk and N. Gilbert (eds). Academic Press, 1995, pp. 145–174.
TACIT: Theory and Applications of Continuous Interaction Techniques, http://kazan.cnuce.cnr.it/TACIT/TACIThome.html
The UIMS tool developers workshop: A metamodel for the runtime architecture of an interactive system. In SIGCHI Bulletin, 1992, 24(1):32-37.
J. Willans and M. Harrison. Verifying the behaviour of virtual world objects. In DSV-IS’2000. P. Palanque and F. Paternó (eds). Springer, 2001, pp. 65–77.
C. Wüthrich. An analysis and model of 3D interaction methods and devices for virtual reality. In DSV-IS’99. D. Duke and A. Puerta (eds). Springer, 1999, pp. 18–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dix, A. (2002). Towards a Ubiquitous Semantics of Interaction: Phenomenology, Scenarios, and Traces. In: Forbrig, P., Limbourg, Q., Vanderdonckt, J., Urban, B. (eds) Interactive Systems:Design, Specification, and Verification. DSV-IS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2545. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36235-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36235-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00266-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36235-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive