Skip to main content

Integrating Dynamic Models for CMM-Based Software Process Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2559))

Abstract

During the last decade software process simulation has been used to address a wide diversity of management problems. Some of these problems are related to strategic management, technology adoption, understanding, training and learning, and risk management, among others. In this work a dynamic integrated framework for software process improvement is presented. This framework combines traditional estimation static models with an intensive utilization of dynamic simulation models of the software process. The aim of this framework is to support a qualitative and quantitative assessment for software process improvement and decision making to achieve a higher software development process capability according to the Capability Maturity Model. The paper describes the concepts underlying this framework, its implementation, the dynamic approach followed to systematically develop the dynamic modules, and an example of its potential use and benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paulk M., Garcia S. M., Chrissis M. B., Bush. M.: Key practices of the capability maturity model. Version 1.1 Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-25. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Standards Organization.: ISO 9001, Quality Systems-Model for Quality Assurance in Design/Development, Production, Installation, and Services (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Standards Organization.: ISO 9000-3, Guideliness for the Application of ISO9001 to the Development, Supply, and Maintenance of Software (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruiz M., Ramos I., Toro M.: A simplified model of software project dynamics. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 59, No 3 (2001) 299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carleton A., Park R. E., Goethert W. B., Florac W. A., Bailey E. K., Pfleeger S. L.: Software measurement for DoD systems: recommendations for initial core measures. Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-19. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christie A M. Simulation-An enabling technology in software engineering. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/articles/christie-apr1999/christieapr1999.html

  7. Putnam L. H.: Measures for excellence: reliable software, on time, within budget. Prentice-Hall, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boehm B.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall Inc. (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boehm B., Horowitz E., Madachy R., Reifer D., Clark, B. K., Steece B., Brown A. W., Chulani S., Abts, C.: Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice-Hall Inc. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woodings T. L.: A Taxonomy of Software Metrics. Software Process Improvement Network (SPIN) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knox S. T.: Modeling the Cost of Software Quality. Digital Technical Journal, Vol. 5, No 4 (fall 1993), 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fleming Q. W., Koppelman J M.: Earned Value Project Management, 2nd Edition, Newton Square, Project Management Institute (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lipke W., Jennin, M.: Software Project Planning, Statistics, and Earned Value. Crosstalk (December 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vensim. Ventana Simulation Environment. Reference Manual, version 4, Belmont, MA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siy H. P.: Identifying the mechanisms driving code inspection costs and benefits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruiz, M., Ramos, I., Toro, M. (2002). Integrating Dynamic Models for CMM-Based Software Process Improvement. In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2559. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00234-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36209-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics