Skip to main content

Invention vs. Discovery A Critical Discussion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Discovery Science (DS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2534))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper proposes an epistemological analysis of the dichotomy discovery/invention. In particular, we argue in favor of the idea that science does not discover facts by induction but rather invents theories that are then checked against experience.

The view of science as a cumulative process was described by Thomas Kuhn [6] as opposed to his view in which science is a process composed by irreconcilable steps.

In Logic der Forschung [12] Popper maintains that scientists invent—rather than discover—laws and then they check them against experience. In this respect, the title The logic of scientific discovery of the English translation is particularly misleading and seems to suggest the opposite idea:indeed the German forschung means literally research rather than discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Bacon. Novum Organum. 1610. Available in: The works, B. Montague (ed.), Parry & MacMillan, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1854.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pierre Duhem. La Théorie Physique: son Object et sa Structure. 1906. Available as: The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. Flach. Conjectures: an inquiry concerning the logic of induction. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Hume. A Treatise of Human Nature. 1739. Available as:E. C. Mossner (ed.), Penguin Books, London, United Kingdom, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Kunh. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1996: 3rd edition, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Lanczos. The Variational Principles of Mechanics. Dover Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Langley, H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw, and J. M. Zytkov. Scientific discovery. Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.S. Mill. A System of Logic. Longmans Green, London, United Kingdom, 1843.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Newton. Mathematical Principles. 1713. Available as: F. Cajori (ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Poincaré. La Science et L’Hypothèse. 1903. Available as: Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Popper. Logik der Forschung. 1935. Available as: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, London, United Kingdom, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Popper. Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, United Kingdom, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Russell. The Problems of Philosophy. Williams and Nogate, London, United Kingdom, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. A. Simon, R. E. Valdés-Pérez, and D. H. Sleeman. Scientific discovery and simplicity of method. Artifical Intelligence, 91(2):177–181, 1997. Editorial of a Special Issue on Scientific Discovery.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Stone. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 36(1):111–147, 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning. An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. N. Whitehead. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Piscopo, C., Birattari, M. (2002). Invention vs. Discovery A Critical Discussion. In: Lange, S., Satoh, K., Smith, C.H. (eds) Discovery Science. DS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36182-0_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36182-0_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00188-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36182-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics