Abstract
After a very short review of the principles underlying Special Relativity, their meaning, and their consequences, we first describe the basic experiments testing SR in a model–independent way which is the most basic way to describe experiments testing the foundations of SR. In order to be able to give quantitative estimates of the validation of SR and, even more important, in order to be able to compare conceptually different experiments, one introduces test theories. We give a review of test theories needed for a consistent description of tests of Lorentz Invariance. The main emphasize is on kinematical test theories of Robertson and Mansouris–Sexl type. Though these test theories were very important in reaching a new understanding of the experimental foundation of SR, an extensive discussion shows that are kinematical test theories are incomplete and, thus, dynamical test theories like the Standard Model Extension are superior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C.M. Will. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev. Relativity, 4: 2001, http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2001-4
G. Amelino-Camelia, C. Lämmerzahl, A. Macias, and H. Müller. The search for quantum gravity signals. In A. Macias, C. Lämmerzahl, and D. Nunez, editors, Gravitation and Cosmology, p. 30. AIP Conference Proceedings 758, Melville, New York, 2005.
D. Mattingly. Modern tests of lorentz invariance. Living Rev. Relativity, 8: 2005, http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2005-5 (cited on Dec. 15, 2005)
C. Lämmerzahl. Relativity and technology. Ann. Physik (Leipzig), 15: 5, 2006.
M. Haugan and C.M. Will. Modern tests of special relativity. Physics Today, May:69, 1987.
M.D. Gabriel and M.P. Haugan. Testing the Einstein Equivalence Principle: Atomic clocks and local Lorentz invariance. Phys. Rev., D 41:2943, 1990.
A.P. Lightman and D.L. Lee. Restricted proof that the weak equivalence principle implies the Einstein equivalence principle. Phys. Rev., D 8:364, 1973.
H.P. Robertson. Postulate versus observation in the Special Theory of Relativity. Rev. Mod. Phys., 21:378, 1949.
R. Mansouri and R.U. Sexl. A test theory of special relativity: I. Simultaneity and clock synchronisation. Gen. Rel. Grav., 8:497, 1977.
C.M. Will. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Revised Edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecky. Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model. Phys. Rev., D 58:116002, 1998.
C. Lämmerzahl, A. Macias, and H. Müller. Lorentz invariance violation and charge (non-)conservation: A general theoretical frame for extensions of the Maxwell equations. Phys. Rev., D:to appear, 2005.
A.A. Michelson and E.W. Morley. On the relative motion of the Earth and the luminiferous ether. Am. J. Sci., 34:333, 1887.
H. Müller, S. Herrmann, A. Saenz, A. Peters, and C. Lämmerzahl. Optical cavity tests of Lorentz invariance for the electron. Phys. Rev., D 68:116006, 2003.
R.S. Shankland, S.W. McCuskey, F.C. Leone, and G. Kuerti. New analysis of the interferometer observations of Dayton C. Miller. Rev. Mod. Phys., 27:167, 1955.
E.W. Morley and D.C. Miller. (letter to Lord Kelvin). Phil. Mag., 8:753, 1904.
E.W. Morley and D.C. Miller. Report of an experiment to detect the FitzGerald- Lorentz-effect. Phil. Mag., 9:680, 1905.
L. Essen. A new aetherdrift experiment. Nature, 175:793, 1955.
V.A. Fock. Theorie von Raum, Zeit und Gravitation. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1960.
H. Reichenbach. Axiomatik der Raum-Zeit Lehre. deGruyter, Berlin, 1924.
A. Grünbaum. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973.
J.A. Winnie. Special Relativity without one-way velocity assumptions: Part I. Philosophy of Science, 37:81, 1968.
W.F. Edwards. Special relativity in aniosotropic space. Am. J. Phys., 31:482, 1963.
J.A. Winnie. Special Relativity without one-way velocity assumptions: Part II. Philosophy of Science, 37:223, 1968.
Y.Z. Zhang. Test theories of special relativity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 27:475, 1994.
C.M. Will. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment: a 1992 update. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D 1:13, 1992.
C. Lämmerzahl, C. Braxmaier, H.-J. Dittus, H. Müller, A. Peters, and S. Schiller. Kinematical test theories for special relativity: A comparison. Int. J. Mod. Phys., D 11:1109, 2002.
C.H. Lineweaver, L. Tenorio, G.F. Smoot, P. Keegstra, A.J. Banday, and P. Lubin. The dipole observed in the cobe dmr 4 year data. Astroph. J., 470:38, 1996.
V.A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel. Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory. Phys. Rev., D 39:1611, 1989.
R. Bluhm. Overview of the SME: Implications and phenomenology of Lorentz violation. Lect. Notes Phys. 702, pp. 191–226, 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lämmerzahl, C. (2006). Test Theories for Lorentz Invariance. In: Ehlers, J., Lämmerzahl, C. (eds) Special Relativity. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 702. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34523-X_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34523-X_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34522-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34523-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)