Skip to main content

Querying Contradictory Databases by Taking into Account Their Reliability and Their Number

  • Chapter
Flexible Databases Supporting Imprecision and Uncertainty

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 203))

Abstract

Databases integration, federated databases, multidatabases, databases merging ([3], [1], [2], [17], [5], [12], [14], [10], [4]) are close problems which aim to query several independent databases viewed as a single one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Baral, S. Kraus, J. Minker, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Combining multiple knowledge bases. IEEE Trans, on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 3(2), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Baral, S. Kraus, J. Minker, and V.S. Subrahmanian. Combining knowledge bases consisting of first order theories. Computational Intelligence, 8(1), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S.B. Navathe. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computer Surveys, 18(4), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Bertossi and J. Chomicki. Query answering in inconsistent databases. In Logics for Emerging Applications of Databases, pages 43–83. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Cholvy. Reasoning with data provided by federated databases. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(1), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Cholvy and R. Demolombe. Reasoning with information sources ordered by topics. In Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence : Methodologies, Systems, Applications (AIMSA′94), pages 151–162, Sofia, September 1994. World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Cholvy and Ch. Garion. Answering queries adressed to several databases according to a majority merging approach. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 22(2), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Cholvy and Ch. Garion. Querying several conflicting databases. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 14(3), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Konieczny and R. Pino-Pérez. On the logic of merging. In Proc. of KR′98L.Bertossi and J. Chomicki., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Source inconsistency and incompleteness in data integration. In Proceedings of KRDB’OS, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Lin. Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence, 83:363–378, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Lin and A.O. Mendelzon. Merging databases under constraints. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7(1), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Lin and A.O. Mendelzon. Knowledge base merging by majority. In Dynamic Worlds: From the Frame Problem to Knowledge Management. Kluwer Academic Publ., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Motro. Multiplex: A forma model for multidatabase and its implementation. In Proc. of NGITS-99, the Fourth Int. Workshop on Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems, Israel, July 1999. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Sadri. Reliability of answers to queries in relational databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 3(2):245–252, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. S.Benferhat, D. Dubois, J. Lang, H. Prade, A. Saffiotti, and P. Smets. A general approach for inconsistency handling and merging information in prioritized knowledge bases. In Proc. of KR′98, Trento, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V.S. Subrahmanian. Amalgamating knowledge bases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19(2):291–331, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cholvy, L. (2006). Querying Contradictory Databases by Taking into Account Their Reliability and Their Number. In: Bordogna, G., Psaila, G. (eds) Flexible Databases Supporting Imprecision and Uncertainty. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33289-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33289-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33289-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics