Skip to main content

Maximum Entropy Inference for Geographical Information Systems

  • Chapter
Flexible Databases Supporting Imprecision and Uncertainty

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 203))

  • 308 Accesses

Abstract

An immediate problem in approaching GIS (Geographic Information Systems) consists in giving a sufficiently agreed definition of what GIS actually are. For present purposes it seems reasonable to consider GIS as being characterized by a twofold nature. On the one hand, GIS consist of a technology used for certain purposes. From this perspective, the crucial issues in GIS research amount to computing problems, both on the hardware and software level. On the other hand, however, GIS research is increasingly more focussed on theoretical issues concerning the representation of geographic information. According to the latter point of view GIS problems include, at the very least, issues of knowledge representation and reasoning. In this chapter we investigate some of the consequences deriving from approaching GIS from the latter point of view. In particular, we will be insisting on the fact that its s‘conceptual side’, so to speak, commits GIS research to achieving scientific goals which happen to be closely related to some of those pursued in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research.3 In doing so, we adopt a perspective according to which GIS are essentially construed as artificial intelligent agents reasoning about a certain classes of natural environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spirit: Symmetrical probabilistic intensional reasoning in inference networks in transition. http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/BWLOR/spirithome.html.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Aerts, M.F. Goodchild, and G.B. M. Heuvelink. Accounting for spatial uncertainty in optimization with spatial decision support systems. Transactions in GIS, 7(2):211–230, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. D. C. Bennett, Jeff B. Paris, and Alena Vencovská. A new criterion for comparing fuzzy logics for uncertain reasoning. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 9(1):31–63, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bochman. A Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change, Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. A. Burrough. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Oxford, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. A. Burrough and R. A. Mcdonnel. Principles of Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Ceccarelli, D. Centeno, F. Giannotti, A. Massolo, C. Parent, A. Raffaetà, C. Renso, S. Spaccapietra, and F. Turini. Experimenting advanced spatio-temporal formalisms: an application to behavioural ecology. Geoinformatica. page to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Chrisman. Exploring Geographic Information Systems. John Wiley and Sons, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. C. Clarke. Analytical and Computer Cartography. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., second edition edition, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Couclelis. The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS, 7(2): 165–175, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Dix, U. Furbach, and I. Niemelä. Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Towards Efficient Calculi and Implementations. In A. Voronkov and A. Robinson, editors, Handbook of Automated Reasoning, volume 2, chapter 18, pages 1121–1234. Elsevier-Science-Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Didier Dubois and Henri Prade. Possibility theory: Qualitative and quantitative aspects. In Dov M. Gabbay and Philippe Smets, editors, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Volume 1. pages 169–226. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Duckham, K. Mason, J. Stell, and M. Worboys. A formal ontological approach to imperfection in geographic iinformation. In Proceedings GISRUK 2000, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Duckham and M. Worboys. GIS: A Computing Perspective — Second Edition. CRC Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.J. Duecker. Land resource information systems: a review of fifteen years experience. Geo-processing, 1:105–128, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.J. Egenhofer and D.M. Mark. Naïve geography. In Proceedings of COSIT 95, volume 988 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1–15. Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Friedman and J. Halpern. Plausibility measures and default reasoning. Journal of the ACM, 48(4):648–685, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D. M. Gabbay. Theoretical foundations for non-monotonic reasoning in expert systems. In Proceedings NATO Advanced Institute on Logics and Models of Cuncurrent Systems, pages 439–457, Berlin, 1985. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. M. Gabbay, C. Hogger, and J. Robinson, editors. Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming. Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods. Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics. North-Holland, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Grumbach, P. Rigaux, M. Scholl, and L. Segoufin. DEDALE, a spatial constraint database. In Proc. of Intl. Workshop on Database programming Languages, volume 1369 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 38–59, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Hájek. Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Hájek. Ten questions and one problem on fuzzy logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 96(1–3):157–165, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Hill and Paris. When maximizing entropy gives the rational closure. JLC: Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Hosni, M. V. Masserotti, and C. Renso. Imperfect information management in geographic information systems. Internal report, ISTI-CNR, Pisa, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colin Howson. The Bayesian approach. In Dov M. Gabbay and Philippe Smets, editors, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Volume 1: Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision, pages 111–134. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. N. Huhns and M. P. Singh. Readings in Agents. Morgan Kaufman Publishers Inc., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jaynes. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. T. Jaynes. The relation of Bayesian and Maximum Entropy methods. In G.J. Erickson and C.R. Smith, editors, Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Science and Engineering, volume 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Kern-Isberner and T. Lukasiewicz. Combining probabilistic logic programming with the power of maximum entropy. Technical Report 1843-02-12, Institut für Informationssysteme, TUW, Wien, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gabriele Kern-Isberner. Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision - Considering Conditionals as Agents, volume 2087 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Kraus, D. J. Lehmann, and M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics, ai, 44:167–207, 1990.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. D. Lehmann and M. Magidor. What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artificial Intelligence, 55(1):1–60, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Lukasiewicz and G. Kern-Isberner. Probabilistic logic programming under maximum entropy. In Anthony Hunter and Simon Parsons, editors, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU-99), volume 1638 of LNAI, pages 279–292, Berlin, July 5–9 1999. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Makinson. General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning. In C. Gabbay, D. M. Hogger and J. Robinson, editors, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, pages 35–110. Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Mancarella, A. Raffaetà, C. Renso, and F. Turini. Integrating knowledge representation and reasoning in geographical information systems. Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(4):417–446, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. McCarthy. From here to human-level AI. In L. Carlucci Aiello, J. Doyle, and S. Shapiro, editors, Fifth Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 640–646. Morgan Kaufmann, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Meyer and W. Rödder. Coherent knowledge processing at maximum entropy by SPIRIT. In Proceedings of the 12th conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 470–476, Portland, Oregon, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. B. Paris. The Uncertain Reasoner’s Companion: A Mathematical Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. J. B. Paris. Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese, 117 (1):75–93, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. J. B. Paris and A. Vencovshá. In defense of the maximum entropy inference process. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 17:77–103, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. J. B. Paris and A. Vencovská. In defence of the maximum entropy inference process. In D. Corfield and J. Williamson, editors, Foundations of Bayesianism, pages 203–240. Kluwer Academic Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  44. F. E. Petry, V. B. Robinson, and M. A. Cobb. Fuzzy Modeling with Spatial Information for Geographic Problems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. David Plaisted and Adnan Yahya. A relevance restriction strategy for automated deduction. Artificial Intelligence, 144(l–2):59–93, 2003.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. A. Raffaeta, C. Renso, and F. Turini. Qualitative spatial reasoning in a logical framework. In Convegno Nazionale di Intelligenza artificiale, September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  47. R. Reiter. On closed world databases. In Gallaire and Minker, editors, Logic and Databases, pages 55–76. Plenum Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  48. R. Reiter. A logic for default reasoning. AI, 13:81–132, 1980.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilhelm Rödder. On the measurability of knowledge acquisition, query processing. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, 33(2):203–218, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. H. Rott. Change, Choice and Inference : A Study of Belief Revision and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  51. C.E. Shannon and W. Weaver. The mathematical theory of communication. Technical report, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  52. P. Walley. Statistical reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Peter Walley. Measures of uncertainty in expert systems. Artif. Intell, 83(l):l–58, 1996.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. M. Wooldridge. An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Wiley, Chichester, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Michael F. Worboys. Nearness relations in environmental space. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7):633–651, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8:338–353, 1965.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hosni, H., Masserotti, M.V., Renso, C. (2006). Maximum Entropy Inference for Geographical Information Systems. In: Bordogna, G., Psaila, G. (eds) Flexible Databases Supporting Imprecision and Uncertainty. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33289-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33289-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33289-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics