Skip to main content

Prädation

  • Chapter
Verhaltensbiologie

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

  • 1513 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abrams PA (2000) The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya L, McNeil J (1998) Predation risk and mating behavior: the response of moths to bat-like ultrasound. Behav Ecol 9:552–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RA, Karasov WH (1981) Contrasts in energy intake and expenditure in sit-and-wait and widely foraging lizards. Oecologia 49:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenz CL, Leger DW (2000) Antipredator vigilance of juvenile and adult thirteen-lined ground squirrels and the role of nutritional need. Anim Behav 59:535–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (1998) Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends Ecol Evol 13:284–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beldade P, Brakefield PM (2002) The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns. Nature 3:442–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnstad ON, Grenfell BT (2001) Noisy clockwork: time series analysis of population fluctuations in animals. Science 293:638–643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Mari M, Daniel JC, Ardron JG, Griffin AS, Evans CS (2002) Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies may have to learn to be wary. Anim Conserv 5:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C (1994) Cooperative hunting in wild chimpanzees. Anim Behav 48:653–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond AB, Kamil AC (2002) Visual predators select for crypticity and polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 415:609–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Noë R (1997) Red colobus and Diana monkeys provide mutual protection against predators. Anim Behav 54:1461–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk J van (2000) The costs of an inducible defense in anuran larvae. Ecology 81:2813–2821

    Google Scholar 

  • Caley MJ, Schluter D (2003) Predators favour mimicry in a tropical reef fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Graham CM, Stoner CJ, Vargas JK (2004) Adaptive significance of antipredator behaviour in artiodactyls. Anim Behav 67:205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Mirza RS, Johnston JG (2002) Learned recognition of heterospecific alarm cues enhances survival during encounters with predators. Behaviour 139:929–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE Jr (2003) Shifted balance of risk and cost after autotomy affects use of cover, escape, activity, and foraging in the keeled earless lizard (Holbrookia propinqua). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Coté IM, Poulin R (1995) Parasitism and group-size in social animals-a metaanalysis. Behav Ecol 6:159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel SR, Macdonald DW (1995) Sociality, group size, and reproductive suppression among carnivores. Adv Stud Behav 24:203–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1978) Adaptive significance of avian mobbing. 1. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z Tierpsychol 48:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes S, Shine R (1998) Sedentary snakes and gullible geckos: predator-prey coevolution in nocturnal rock-dwelling reptiles. Anim Behav 55:1373–1385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtel C (2004) Reciprocal recognition of sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi) and redfronted lemur (Eulemur fulvus rufus) alarm calls. Anim Cogn 7:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtel C, Kappeler PM (2002) Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:262–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Metz M, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2001) Baboon responses to graded bark variants. Anim Behav 61:925–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster WA, Treherne JE (1981) Evdence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293:466–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch K von (1941) Über einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung. Z vergl Physiol 29:46–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Geffeney S, Brodie ED Jr, Ruben PC, Brodie ED 3rd (2002) Mechanisms of adaptation in a predator-prey arms race: TTX-resistant sodium channels. Science 297:1336–1339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-da-Costa R, Palleroni A, Hauser MD, Touchton J, Kelley JP (2003) Rapid acquisition of an alarm response by a neotropical primate to a newly introduced avian predator. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:605–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J theoret Biol 31:295–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman EJ, Abrahams MV (2000) Sensory compensation and the detection of predators: the interaction between chemical and visual information. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:571–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedenström A, Rosén M (2001) Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds. Behav Ecol 12:150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiling AM, Herberstein ME (2004) Predator-prey coevolution: Australian native bees avoid their spider predators. Biol Lett 271:S196–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann EW, Buchanan-Smith HM (2000) The behavioural ecology of mixed-species troops of callitrichine primates. Biol Rev 75:169–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hieber CS, Stimson RS, Boyle J, Uetz GW (2002) The spider and fly revisited: ploy-counterploy behavior in a unique predator-prey system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höner OP, Wachter B, East ML, Runyoro VA, Hofer H (2005) The effect of prey abundance and foraging tactics on the population dynamics of a social, territorial carnivore, the spotted hyena. Oikos 108:544–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway RN (1989) New Zealand’s pre-human avifauna and its vulnerability. New Zealand J Ecol 12:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WO, Eilenberg J, Boomsma JJ (2002) Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1811–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugie DM (2003) The waiting game: a ‘battle of waits’ between predator and prey. Behav Ecol 14:807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd CR (1996) Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims RA, Andreassen HP (2000) Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds. Nature 408:194–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joron M, Mallet JLB (1998) Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm? Trends Ecol Evol 13:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapan D (2001) Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry. Nature 409:338–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp M, Tollrian R (2003) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator-prey system: inducible offences against inducible defences? Ecol Lett 6:742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krama T, Krams I (2005) Cost of mobbing call to breeding pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol 16:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Krane S, Itagaki Y, Nakanishi K, Weldon PJ (2003) ‘Venom’ of the slow loris: sequence similarity of prosimian skin gland protein and Feld 1 cat allergen. Naturwissenschaften 90:60–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Lyytinen A, Mappes J (2001) Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:357–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle S (2001) Anti-predator strategies and grouping patterns in white-tailed deer and mule deer. Ethology 107:295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB, Schoener TW, Spiller DA (2004) Predator-induced behaviour shifts and natural selection in field-experimental lizard populations. Nature 432:505–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB (1999) Response of foraging group members to sentinel calls in suricates, Suricata suricatta. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1013–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser MB (2001) The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2315–2324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM (1996) The development of alarm-call response behaviour in free-living Belding’s ground squirrels. Anim Behav 52:489–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilaita S (2003) Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage. Evolution 57:1248–1254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB (1989) Flocking preferences in relation to vigilance benefits and aggression costs in mixed-species shorebird flocks. Oikos 56:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller L, Gutzke W (1999) The role of the vomeronasal organ of crotalines (Reptilia: Serpentines: Viperidae) in predator detection. Anim Behav 58:53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minta SC, Minta KA, Lott DF (1992) Hunting associations between badgers (Taxidea taxus) and coyotes (Canis latrans). J Mammal 73:814–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani A, Chal JS, Srinivasan MV (2003) Motion camouflage in dragonflies. Nature 423:604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mols CMM, van Oers K, Witjes LMA, Lessells CM, Drent PJ, Visser ME (2004) Central assumptions of predator-prey models fail in a semi-natural experimental system. Biol Lett 271:S85–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz RFA, Bürgin H (1987) Group response to alarm pheromones in social wasps and the honeybee. Ethology 76:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Mundry R, Ostreiher R, Hultsch H, Schrader L, Todt D (1999) Cooperatively breeding Arabian babblers call differently when mobbing in different predator-induced situations. Behav Ecol 10:636–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Scheel D, Pusey AE (1990) Why lions form groups: food is not enough. Am Nat 136:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palleroni A, Miller CT, Hauser M, Marler P (2005) Prey plumage adaptation against falcon attack. Nature 434:973–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JK (1993) Comparison of the hunting behavior of 4 piscine predators attacking schooling prey. Ethology 95:233–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlmann K, Grasso FW, Breithaupt T (2001) Tracking wakes: the nocturnal predatory strategy of piscivorous catfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7371–7374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Pyke GH, Caraco T (1982) The scanning behavior of juncos: a gametheoretical approach. J theoret Biol 95:89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Riipi M, Alatalo RV, Lindström L, Mappes J (2001) Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations. Nature 413:512–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts G (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51:1077–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Lima SL (1997) Predator-induced breeding suppression and its consequences for predator-prey population dynamics. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:409–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Scannell J, Roberts G, Lazarus J (2001) Prey scan at random to evade observant predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:541–547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaik CP van, Hörstermann M (1994) Predation risk and the number of adult males in a primate group: a comparative test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW, Spiller DA, Losos JB (2001) Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations. Nature 412:183–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210:801–803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shashar N, Hanlon R, Petz A (1998) Polarization vision helps detect transparent prey. Nature 393:222–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW (1977) Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197:1246–1253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt TN (2002) The coevolution of warning signals. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:741–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed MP, Ruxton GD (2002) Evolution of suicidal signals. Nature 416:375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speed MP, Ruxton GD (2004) Aposematism: what should our starting point be? Proc R Soc Lond B 272:431–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed MP, Alderson NJ, Hardman C, Ruxton GD (2000) Testing Müllerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:725–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speed MP, Kelly DJ, Davidson AM, Ruxton GD (2005) Countershading enhances crypsis with some bird species but not others. Behav Ecol 16:327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth NC, Falck W, Bjørnstad ON, Krebs CJ (1997) Population regulation in snowshoe hare and Canadian lynx: asymmetric food web configurations between hare and lynx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5147–5152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner CJ, Caro TM, Graham CM (2003) Ecological and behavioral correlates of coloration in artiodactyls: systematic analyses of conventional hypotheses. Behav Ecol 14:823–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sword GA (1999) Density-dependent warning coloration. Nature 397:217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sword GA (2002) A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1639–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Théry M, Casas J (2002) Predator and prey views of spider camouflage. Nature 415:133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treves A, Drescher A, Ingrisano N (2001) Vigilance and aggregation in black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treves A, Drescher A, Snowdon CT (2003) Maternal watchfulness in black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Ethology 109:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Richardson DS, Blaakmeer K, Komdeur J (2000) Experimental evidence for innate predator recognition in the Seychelles warbler. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2253–2258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters S, Zuberbühler K (2003) Mixed-species associations of Diana and Campbell’s monkeys: the costs and benefits of a forest phenomenon. Behaviour 140:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yachi S, Higashi M (1998) The evolution of warning signals. Nature 394:882–884

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Prädation. In: Verhaltensbiologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29977-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics