Skip to main content

Patients at Risk for Pressure Ulcers and Evidence-Based Care for Pressure Ulcer Prevention

  • Chapter
Pressure Ulcer Research

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mor V et al. (1998) Benchmarking quality in nursing homes: the Q-Metrics system. Can J Qual Health Care 14:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstrom N, Allman RM, Carlson CE, et al. (1992) Pressure ulcers in adults: predication and prevention. Clinical practice guideline, Number 3. AHCPR Publication No. 92-0047. Agency for Health Care Polich and Research, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cuddigan J, Ayello EA, Sussman C, Baranoski S (eds) (2001) Pressure ulcers in America: prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks EL, Duncan GW (1940) Effects of pressure on tissues. Arch Surg 40:696–709

    Google Scholar 

  5. Husain T (1953) An experimental study of some pressure effects on tissues with reference to the bed-sore problem. J Pathol Bacteriol 66:347–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosiak M (1959) Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. Arch Phys Med Rehab 40:62–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel RK, Priest DL, Wheatley DC (1981) Etiologic factors in pressure sores: an experimental model. Arch Phys Med Rehab 62:492–498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Allman RM, Goode PS, Patrick MM, Burst N, Bartolucci AA (1995) Pressure ulcer risk factors among hospitalized patients with activity limitation. JAMA, 273(11), 865–870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bader DL, White SH (1998) The viability of soft tissues in elderly subjects undergoing hip surgery. Age Ageing, 27:217–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholson PW, Leeman AL, O’Neill CJA, Dobbs SM, Deshmukh AA, Denham MJ (1988) Pressure sores: Effect of Parkinson’s disease and cognitive function on spontaneous movement in bed. Age and Ageing 17: 111–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schnelle JF, Adamson GM, Cruise PA, Al-Samarrai N, Sarbaugh FC, Uman G, Ouslander JG (1997) Skin disorders and moisture in incontinent nursing home residents: Intervention implications. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:1182–1188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Horn SD, Bender SA, Bergstrom N, Cook AS, Ferguson ML, Rimmasch HL, Sharkey SS, Smout RJ, Taler GA, Voss AC (2002) Description of the National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1816–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K (2002) Nurse staffing and quality of care in hospitals in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Braden BJ, Bergstrom N (2000) A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehab Nurs 25:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dinsdale SM (1974) Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 55: 147–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergstrom N, Braden B (1992) A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:747–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergstrom N, Bennett MA, Carlson CE, et al. (1994) Treatment of pressure ulcers. Clinical practice guideline, number 15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0652

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) (1999) Guideline on treatment of pressure ulcers EPUAP, Oxford (available from: http://www.epuap.org, accessibility verified on 27 February 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maklebust J 1999 An update on horizontal patient support surfaces. Ostomy/Wound Management 45[Supp

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodeheaver GT (1999) Pressure ulcer debridement and cleansing: a review of current literature. Ostomy/Wound Management 45[Suppl 1A]:80S–85S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shekelllle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Eccles MP, Frimshaw JM, Woolf SH (2001) Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines: How quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA 286:1461–1467

    Google Scholar 

  22. Horn S, Ashton C, Tracy D (1994) Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers by protocol. In Horn S, Hopkins D (eds) Clinical practice improvement: a new technology for developing cost-effective quality health care. Faulkner & Gray, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Boynton P, Bruch S (1995) Using a research-based assessment scale in clinical practice. Nurs Clin North Am 30:539–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lyder CH, Preston J, Grady JN, Scinto J, Allman R, Bergstrom N, Rodeheaver G (2001) Quality of care for hospitalized medicare patients at risk for pressure ulcers. Arch Intern Med 161:1549–1554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuddigan J, Frantz RA (1998) Pressure ulcer research: pressure ulcer treatment: a monograph. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Adv Wound Care 8:46–48

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, Champagne M, Ruby E (1998) Predicting pressure ulcer risk: a multi-site study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale. Nurs Res 47:261–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Laguzza A, Holman V (1987) The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs Res 36:205–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Braden BJ, Bergstrom N (1994) Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population. Res Nurs Health 17:459–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pang SM, Wong TK (1998) Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital. Nurs Res 47:147–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Marum RJ, Ooms ME, Ribbe MW, Van Eijk J (2000) The Dutch pressure sore assessment score or the Norton scale for identifying at-risk nursing home patients? Age Ageing 29:63–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, Ruby E (1996) Multi-site study of incidence of pressure ulcers and the relationship between risk level, demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and prescription of preventive interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:22–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bates-Jensen BM, Cadogan M, Jorge J, Schnelle JF (2003) Standardized quality assessment system to evaluate pressure ulcer care in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1194–1202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Whittemore R (1998) Pressure reduction support surfaces: a review of the literature. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 25:6–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Norton D, McLaren R, Exton-Smith AN (1962) An investigation of geriatric nursing problems in hospital. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Delfloor T (2001) Wisselhouding, minder frequent en toch minder decubitus. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 31: 174–177

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sideranko S, Quinn A, Burns K, Froman RD (1992) Effects of position and mattress overlay on sacral and heel pressures in a clinical population. Res Nurs Health 15:245–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abu-Own A, Sommerville K, Schurr JH (1995) Effects of compression and type of bed surface on the microcirculation of the heel. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surgy 9:1995

    Google Scholar 

  38. Colin D, Abraham P, Preault L (1996) Comparison of 90° and 30° laterally inclined positions in the prevention of pressure ulcers using transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide pressures. Adv Wound Care 9: 35–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Colin D, Loyant R, Abraham P (1996) Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care 9:25–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bates-Jensen BM, Cadogan M, Osterweil D, Levy-Storms L, Jorge J, A-Samarrai N, Grbic V, Schnelle JF (2003) The minimum data set pressure ulcer indicator: does it reflflect differences in care processes related to pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1203–1212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stotts NA, Rodeheaver GT, Thomas DR et al. (2001) An instrument to measure healing in pressure ulcers: development and validation of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). J Gerontol 56:M795–799

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hellewell TB, Major PA, Foresman PA (1997) A cytotoxicity evaluation of antimicrobial and nonantimicrobial wound cleansers. Wounds 9:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  43. Burke DT, Ho CH, Saucier MA (1998) Effects of hydrotherapy on pressure ulcer healing. Arch Phys Med Rehab 77:394–398

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Xakellis GC, Chriscilles EA (1992) Hydrocolloids versus saline gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost effective analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 73:463–469

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Colwell JC, Foreman MD, Trotter JP (1993) A comparison of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers. Decubitus 6:28–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bolton LL, van Rijswijk L, Shaffer FA (1997) Quality wound care equals cost effective wound care: A clinical model. Adv Wound Care 10:33–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Baker LR, Chambers R, DeMuth S (1997) Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers. Diabetes Care 20:405–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wood J, Evans P, Schallreuter K (1993) A multicenter study on the use of pulsed low-intensity direct current for healing chronic state II and III decubitus ulcers. Arch Dermatol 129:999–1009

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Stefanovska A, Vodovnik L, Benko H (1993) Treatment of chronic wounds by means of electric and electromagnetic fields. 2. Value of FES parameters for pressure sore treatment. Med Biol Eng Comput 31:213–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Griffin J, Tooms R, Mendius R (1991) Efficacy of high-voltage pulsed current for healing of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 71:433–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kemp MG, Krouskop TA, Garber BS, Carlson CE (1992) Guideline: mechanical loading and support surfaces. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, pp 137–148

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergstorm, N. (2005). Patients at Risk for Pressure Ulcers and Evidence-Based Care for Pressure Ulcer Prevention. In: Bader, D.L., Bouten, C.V., Colin, D., Oomens, C.W. (eds) Pressure Ulcer Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28804-X_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28804-X_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25030-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28804-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics