Skip to main content

Biometry for Refractive Lens Surgery

  • Chapter
Refractive Lens Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R et al (1998) Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 126:524–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giers U, Epple C (1990) Comparison of A-scan device accuracy. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watson A, Armstrong R (1999) Contact or immersion technique for axial length measurement? Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 27:49–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS (2001) Use of power modulations in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraff MC (1995) A-scan biometry and IOL implant power calculations, vol 13. Focal points. American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenzl RE, Gills JP, Cherchio M (1998) Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula. Ophthalmology 105:1759–1764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffer KJ (1994) Intraocular lens power calculation in radial keratotomy eyes. Phaco Foldables 7:6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holladay JT (1995) Understanding corneal topography, the Holladay diagnostic summary, user’s guide and tutorial. EyeSys Technologies, Houston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  10. Celikkol L, Pavlopoulos G, Weinstein B, Celikkol G, Feldman ST (1995) Calculation of intraocular lens power after radial keratotomy with computerized videokeratography. Am J Ophthalmol 120:739–750

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Speicher L (2001) Intraocular lens calculation status after corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 12:17–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamilton DR, Hardten DR (2003) Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14:44–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeh WG, Koch DD (1999) Comparison of contact lens overrefraction and standard keratometry for measuring corneal curvature in eyes with lenticular opacity. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:898–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen L, Mannis MJ, Salz JJ, Garcia-Ferrer FJ, Ge J (2003) Analysis of intraocular lens power calculation in post-radial keratotomy eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, McDonald MB (1997) Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia. Cornea 16:517–524

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aramberri J (2003) Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: double K method. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2063–2068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koch DD, Wang L (2003) Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2039–2042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gills JP, Gayton JL (1998) Reducing pre-existing astigmatism. In: Gills JP (ed) Cataract surgery: the state of the art. Slack, Thorofare, NJ, pp 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nichamin L (1993) Refining astigmatic keratotomy during cataract surgery. Ocul Surg News April 15

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS (2001) Use of power modulations in phacoemulsification. Choo-choo chop and flip phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 16:552–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK (2002) Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry: outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:239–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS (2002) Refractive lens exchange with the array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:421–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamed AM, Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD (2002) A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in-situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 109:651–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Packer, M., Fine, I.H., Hoffman, R.S. (2005). Biometry for Refractive Lens Surgery. In: Fine, I.H., Packer, M., Hoffman, R.S. (eds) Refractive Lens Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28300-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28300-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22716-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28300-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics