Controlling Dimension

doi:10.1007/3-540-28168-1_5

384 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 44.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Böckli (2003:562).
Google Scholar
See Richardson and Baril (2003:37).
Google Scholar
Böckli (2003:562).
Google Scholar
Buffel (2003:19).
Google Scholar
Richardson and Baril (2003:38).
Google Scholar
See Herrmann (2003:42).
Google Scholar
See KPMG (2003, part 5:1f).
Google Scholar
Böckli (2003:565).
Google Scholar
Böckli (2003:566).
Google Scholar
Böckli (2003:566).
Google Scholar
Böckli (2003:567–570).
Google Scholar
See Meyer (2003:2).
Google Scholar
Schneider (2000).
Google Scholar
Vogt and Alresch (2003:814).
Google Scholar
Vogt (2003:817).
Google Scholar
Imhoff (2003:124).
Google Scholar
See Bumbacher (2003).
Google Scholar
Bookal (2002:47): “When we call for public reporting on internal controls (i.e. internal auditors), we have to be ready to furnish boards with the information they need to make informed decisions and disclosures.”
Google Scholar
Malik (2002:226f).
Google Scholar
Ernst & Young (2002:7).
Google Scholar
Ernst & Young (2002:7).
Google Scholar
Garrett (2003:XXII).
Google Scholar
Ernst & Young (2002:7).
Google Scholar
Shaw (2003:25).
Google Scholar
See Kalia (2003).
Google Scholar
Ernst & Young (2002:11).
Google Scholar
Müller’s (2003) presentation at a board conference.
Google Scholar
Müller (2003)
Google Scholar
Gygi (2003:B11).
Google Scholar
See Ernst & Young (2002:11).
Google Scholar
Dubs (2003), and Protiviti Guidelines (2002:11f).
Google Scholar
Dubs (2003). Also, Overell (2003:4) suggests that “The biggest risk in any company comes from staff... The majority of FTSE 300 companies now have whistle blowing procedures in place.”
Google Scholar
KPMG (2003).
Google Scholar
Macus in Noetzli (2004:51).
Google Scholar
The greatest frustration of board members “is not that they get too little information, but that they get too much information that is neither well organized nor well summarized” (Carter and Lorsch, 2004:27).
Google Scholar
See Charan (2005:69).
Google Scholar
Böckli in Noetzli (2004:36).
Google Scholar
Malik (1998:193f).
Google Scholar
Carter and Lorsch (2004:151).
Google Scholar
Meyer (2003:13)
Google Scholar
See Healy (2003:193).
Google Scholar
Beatty (2003:21).
Google Scholar
Ward (2003:6).
Google Scholar
Ward (2003:7).
Google Scholar
See Newell and Wilson (2002:21), and Ward (2003:136).
Google Scholar
See Hilb (2002).
Google Scholar
KPMG (2003:7). See also Newing (2003:6), and for Europe, the critical recommendations made by Pastré (2003).
Google Scholar
Bernet (2003).
Google Scholar
Reichenberger (2003:B7).
Google Scholar
See, for example Pfitzer and Oser (2003:379); results of their ratings can be viewed on their website.
Google Scholar
Rowley and Beatty (2002)
Google Scholar
See Rowley and Beatty (2002).
Google Scholar
Clarkson Center for Board Effectiveness (2003:12).
Google Scholar
Carter and Lorsch (2004:153).
Google Scholar
Hilb, et al (2003).
Google Scholar

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Controlling Dimension. In: New Corporate Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28168-1_5

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28168-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28167-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-28168-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics