Skip to main content

A Comparison of a Cellular Automaton and a Macroscopic Model

  • Conference paper
Traffic and Granular Flow ’03

Summary

In this paper we describe a relation between a microscopic stochastic traffic cellular automaton model (i.e., the STCA) and the macroscopic first-order continuum model (i.e., the LWR model). The innovative aspect is that we explicitly incorporate the STCA's stochasticity in the construction of the fundamental diagram used by the LWR model. We apply our methodology to a small case study, giving a comparison of both models, based on simulations, numerical, and analytical calculations of their tempo-spatial behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.J. Lighthill and G.B. Whitham. On kinematic waves: II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. In Proceedings of the Royal Society, volume A229, pages 317–345, 1955.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. P.I. Richards. Shockwaves on the highway. Operations Research, (4):42–51, 1956.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlos F. Daganzo. A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow. Transportation Research 29B, pages 261–276, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.P. Lebacque. The Godunov scheme and what it means for first order traffic flow models. In J.B. Lesort, editor, Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proceeding of the 13th ISTTT. Pergamon, Oxford, November 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kai Nagel and Michael Schreckenberg. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal de Physique I France, 2:2221–2229, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kai Nagel. Particle hopping models and traffic flow theory. Physical Review E, 53(5):4655–4672, May 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maerivoet, S., Logghe, S., De Moor, B., Immers, B. (2005). A Comparison of a Cellular Automaton and a Macroscopic Model. In: Hoogendoorn, S.P., Luding, S., Bovy, P.H.L., Schreckenberg, M., Wolf, D.E. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow ’03. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28091-X_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics