Skip to main content
  • 1125 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a high performance algorithm which is adapted to uncertainty computing and give a new combination rules coming from the D–S and supply a gap that Dempster ignoranced. The evidence sources are adapted in different cases. The credibility of the evidence changes along with the different focus element. So, we give various credibility for every focus element to increase precision. The new method improves the precision and gets rid of disconvergent answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yager R.: Using Approximate Reasoning to Represent Default Knowledge. Artificial Intelligence, 31(1), 99–112 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubois D., Prade H.: Default Reasoning and Possibility Theory. Artificial Intelligence, 35(2), 243–257 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen L., Rao S.S.: Modified Dempster-Shafer theory for multicriteria optimization. Engineering Optimization, 30(3/4), 177–201 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy C.K.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decision Support Systems, 29(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy, Robin R.: Dempster-Shafer theory for sensor fusion in autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(2), 197–206 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lefevre E., Colot O.: Vannoorenberghe P. Belief function combination and conflict management. Information Fusion, 3(2), 149–162 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, Robin R.: Adaptive rule of combination for observations over time. in Proc of IEEE International Conference on Multi-sensor, Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems 1996 IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 125–131 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pigeon Luc, Solaiman Bassel, Toutin Thierry etc. Dempster-Shafer theory for multi-satellites remotely-sensed observations. in Proceedings of SPIEThe International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE, Bellingham, WA, USA. 4051, 228–236 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Z., Hu W.D., Yu W.X.: A combination rule of conflict evidence based on proportional belief assignment, Acta Electronica Sinica, 29(z1):1852–1855 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Josang A.: The consensus operator for combining beliefs, Artificial Intelligence, 141(1–2), 157–170 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shi, S., Li, Q., Xu, L., Xia, D., Xia, X., Yu, G. (2005). A High Performance Algorithm on Uncertainty Computing. In: Zhang, W., Tong, W., Chen, Z., Glowinski, R. (eds) Current Trends in High Performance Computing and Its Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27912-1_58

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics