Abstract
An overview is presented of the various procedures available for model selection in three-mode models, especially the Tucker2 model, the Tucker3 model and the Parafac model. Various procedures will be reviewed such as selecting from a hierarchy, three-mode scree plots, deviance plot, sums of squares partitioning, bootstrap and jackknife procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ANDERSSON, C.A. and HENRION, R. (1999): A general algorithm for obtaining simple structure of core arrays in N-way PCA with application to fluorometric data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 31, 255–278.
BRO, R. (1998): Multi-way analysis in the food industry. Models, algorithms, and applications.. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BRO, R. and KIERS, H.A.L. (2003): A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models. Journal of Chemometrics, 17, 274–286.
EASTMENT, H.T. and KRZANOWSKI, W.J. (1982): Cross-validatory choice of the number of components from a principal component analysis. Technometrics, 24, 73–77.
EFRON, B. (1979): Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.
GOWER, J.C. (1977): The analysis of three-way grids. In: P. Slater (Ed.): Dimensions of intrapersonal space. Wiley, New York, 163–173.
HARSHMAN, R.A. (1984): ”How can I know if it's’ real'?” A catalog of diagnostics for use with three-mode factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In: H.G. Law, C.W. Snyder Jr, J.A. Hattie and R.P. McDonald (Eds.): Research methods for multimode data analysis. Praeger, New York, 566–591.
HARSHMAN, R.A. and DESARBO, W.S. (1984): An application of PARAFAC to a small sample problem, demonstrating preprocessing, orthogonality constraints, and split-half diagnostic techniques. In: H.G. Law, C.W. Snyder Jr, J.A. Hattie and R.P. McDonald (Eds.): Research methods for multimode data analysis. Praeger, New York, 602–642.
KIERS, H.A.L. (1988): Comparison of ”Anglo-Saxon” and ”French” three-mode methods. Statistique et Analyse des Données, 13, 14–32.
KIERS, H.A.L. (1991a): Hierarchical relations among three-way methods. Psychometrika, 56, 449–470.
KIERS, H.A.L. (2004): Bootstrap confidence intervals for three-way methods. Journal of Chemometrics, 18, 22–36.
KIERS, H.A.L. and VAN MECHELEN, I. (2001): Three-way component analysis: Principles and illustrative application. Psychological Methods, 6, 84–110.
KROONENBERG, P.M. (1983). Three-mode principal component analysis. Theory and applications. DSWO Press, Leiden, The Netherlands [now available as PDF document from: http:three-mode.leidenuniv.nl]
KROONENBERG, P.M. and VAN DER VOORT, T.H.A. (1987): Multiplicatieve decompositie van interacties bij oordelen over de werkelijkheidswaarde van televisiefilms [Multiplicative decomposition of interactions for judgements of realism of television films]. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 8, 117–144
LOUWERSE, D.J., SMILDE, A.K., and KIERS, H.A.L. (1999): Cross-validation of multiway component models. Journal of Chemometrics, 13, 491–510.
MANDEL, J. (1971): A new analysis of variance model for non-additive data. Technometrics 13, 1–18.
MURAKAMI, T. and KROONENBERG, P.M. (2003): Individual differences in semantic differential studies and their analysis by three-mode models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 87–96.
RIU, J. and BRO, R. (2003): Jack-knife technique for outlier detection and estimation of standard errors in PARAFAC models., Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 65, 35–69.
TIMMERMAN, M.E. and KIERS, H.A.L. (2000): Three-mode principal components analysis: Choosing the numbers of components and sensitivity to local optima. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 1–16.
TUCKER, L.R. (1966): Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279–311.
WEESIE, J. and VAN HOUWELINGEN, H. (1983): GEPCAM users' manual: Generalized principal components analysis with missing values. (Technical report). Institute of Mathematical Statistics, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kroonenberg, P.M. (2005). Model Selection Procedures in Three-Mode Component Models. In: Bock, HH., et al. New Developments in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27373-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27373-5_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23809-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27373-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)