Abstract
Health economics has experienced a substantial rise within the healthcare industry over the past few years. Several disciplines have developed new techniques to evaluate the economic impact of pharmaceuticals in clinical care. Clinicians, pharmacists, economists, epidemiologists, and operations researchers have contributed to this field. Given the economic reality that resources are limited and needs and expectations are not infinite, medical economists try to find solutions on how these resources can be allocated optimally, to maximize the production of health or what society perceives as health. Health economists differentiate allocation efficiency and production efficiency. From the perspective of a health insurance plan allocation efficiency is reached when those drug classes or clinical programs are covered that will produce most health per expenditure. This requires a common monetary metric of health gains across the broad spectrum of diseases, conditions, and health outcomes. Once it is decided to cover a specific treatment or clinical program, economists try to identify the most cost-effective product within a class of comparable choices using cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses. Both allocation and production efficiency are two critically important concepts for the economic success of biotech products. This article will provide a rationale why health economics is critically important for the future of healthcare and explains fundamental economic tools for evaluating products and services with special emphasis on gene-derived technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Harris A, Buxton M, O’Brien B, Ruttem F, Drummond M (2001) Using economic evidence in reimbursement decisions for health technologies: experience of 4 countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconom Outcomes Res 1: 7–12
Birkett DJ, Mitchell AS, McManus P (2001) A cost-effectiveness approach to drug subsidy and pricing in Australia. Health Aff (Millwood) 20:104–114
Rice T (1998) The economics of health reconsidered. Health Administration Press, Chicago
PausJenssen AM, Singer PA, Detsky AS (2003) Ontario’s formulary committee. How recommendations are made. PharmacoEconomics 21:285–294
Ess S, Schneeweiss S, Szucs T (2003) European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure. PharmacoEconomics 21:89–103
Institute of Medicine (1997) Managing managed care: quality improvement in behavioral health. National Academy Press, Washington
Navarro RP (1998) Exporting managed care: importing quality lessons. Manag Care Interface 11:61–62
Feachem RG, Sekhri NK, White KL (2002) Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California’s Kaiser Permanente. BMJ 324:135–141
Shortell SM, Kaluzny AD (1997) Essentials of health care management. Delmar, Albany
Bleecker GC (1993) Reimbursement and pharmacoeconomic perspectives in biotechnology. Am J Hosp Pharm 50:S27–S30
Weatherly H, Drummond M, Smith D (2002) Using evidence in the development of local health policies. Some evidence from the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 18:771–781
Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the evaluation of health care programs, 2nd edn. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford
Weinstein MC (1996) From cost-effectiveness ratios to resource allocation: where to draw the line? In: Sloan FA (ed) Valuing health care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–97
Tengs T (2000) One thousand quality-of-life estimates. Med Care 38:592–637
Harris A, Buxton M, O’Brien B, Rutten F, Drummond M (2003) Using economic evidence in reimbursement decisions for health technologies: experience of 4 countries. http://www.future-drugs.com. Cited 1 Apr 2003
Hill SR, Mitchell AS, Henry DA (2000) Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. JAMA 283:2116–2121
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York
Lee RH (2000) Economics for healthcare managers. Health Administration Press, Washington
Robertson JA, Brody B, Buchanan A, Kahn J, McPerson E (2002) Pharmacogenetic challenges for the health care system. Health Aff (Millwood) 21:155–167
Foot E, Bieber F, Kroll W, et al (2001) Impact of pharmacogenetics on health care and health economics. Int J Pharm Med 15:95–100
Morgan S, Hurley J, Miller F, Giacomini M (2003) Predictive genetic tests and health system costs. Can Med Assoc J 168: 989–991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Szucs, T.D. (2005). Health Economics in the Genomic Age. In: Senn, HJ., Morant, R. (eds) Tumor Prevention and Genetics III. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 166. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26980-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26980-0_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22228-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26980-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)