Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyse der Revisionskonzepte von modularen und nichtmodularen Systemen

  • Chapter
Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barrack RL (1994) Modularity of prosthetic implants. J Am Acad Orth of Surg 2(1): 16–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire-stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 18(3 Suppl 1): 98–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD, Ranawat CS (1985): Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement. J Bone and Joint Surg 67-A(7): 1074–1085

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron HU (2002) The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1): 138–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron HU (2003) Orthopaedic crossfire-stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 18(3 Suppl 1): 101–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castro FP jr, Chimento G, Munn BG (1997) An analysis of food and drug administration medical device reports relating to total joint components. J Arthroplasty. 12(7): 765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chmell MJ, Rispler D, Poss R (1995) The impact of modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orhop 319: 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chu CM, Wang SJ, Lin LC (2001) Dissociation of modular total hip arthroplasty at the femoral head-neck interface after loosening of the acetabular shell following hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 16(6): 806–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM, Capps M, Brinson MF, Trick LW (2000) Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4-to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 15(7): 840–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuckler JM (1995) Evolution and experience with modular hip system. Orthopaedics today (Dec)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Earll MD, Fehring TK, Griffin WL (2002): Success rate of modular component exchange for the treatment of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(7): 864–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fessy MH, N'Diaye A, Carret JP, Fisher LP (1999) Locating the center of rotation of the hip. Surg Radiol Anat 21: 247–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gierer P, Andreß HJ, Landes J, Lob G (2001) The treatment of bone defect situations of the proximal femur with a modular hip prosthesis. Eur J Trauma E-(Suppl) 1: 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg VM (2002) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular femoral hip design. Am J Orthop 2002 31(4): 202–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iglic A, Anatolic V, Srakar F (1993) Biomechanical analysis of various operative hip joint rotation center shifts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112: 124–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karachalios T, Hartofilakidis G, Zacharakis N, Tsekoura M (1993) The role of the center of rotation in THA Clinical Orthopaedics and related research. 296: 140–147

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P (2003) A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2-to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18(3 Suppl 1): 94–97

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manley MT, D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Edidin AA (2002) Osteolysis: a disease of access to fixation interfaces. Clin Orthop 405: 129–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattingly D, McCarthy J, Bierbaum BE, Chandler HP, Turner RH, Cameron HU, McTighe T (1991) Revising the deficient proximal femur. AAOS meeting, Anaheim/CA

    Google Scholar 

  20. McCarthy JC, Bono JV, O'Donnell (1997) Custom and modular components in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 344: 162–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McTighe T (1999) Design considerations for cementless total hip arthroplasty. JISRF 11/99

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ochsner PE (Hrsg)(2003) Die Hüfttotalprothese. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orthopädische Operationslehre (1994) Teil 2/1, Revisionsalloarthroplastik des Hüftgelenkes. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 324–356

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenberg AG (2002) Fixation for the millenium: the hip. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1): 3–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schuh A, Salminen S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G (2002) Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty with the MRP titanium stem. SOT 2/25: 175–178

    Google Scholar 

  26. Toni A, Paderni S, Sudanese A, Guerra E, Traina F, Giardina F, Antonietti B, Giunti A (2001) Anatomic cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic bearings and modular necks: 3 to 5 years follow-up. Hip International 11/1: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  27. Toomey SD, Hopper RH jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA (2001) Modular component exchange for treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement in selected patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 A(10): 1529–1533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R (2000) A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthopaed (SICOT) 24: 134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Young AM, Sychterz CJ, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA (2002) Effect of acetabular modularity on polyethylene wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 A(1): 58–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeiler G, Holzwarth U (1997) Indikation, Technik und erste Ergebnisse des modularen Hüftprothesenschaftes MRP-Titan. Z Orthopädie 4: 135

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. S. Eichinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Forst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Schloss-Str. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf

    Peter Thümler (Professor, Dr. med.) (Professor, Dr. med.)

  2. Erlangen-Nürnberg, Rathsberger Str. 57, 91054, Erlangen

    Raimund Forst (Professor, Dr. med.) (Professor, Dr. med.)

  3. Rummelsberg 71, 90592, Schwarzenbruck

    Günther Zeiler (Professor, Dr. med.) (Professor, Dr. med.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eichinger, S., Forst, R. (2005). Analyse der Revisionskonzepte von modularen und nichtmodularen Systemen. In: Thümler, P., Forst, R., Zeiler, G. (eds) Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26803-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26803-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20060-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26803-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation