Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knochentransplantate: Klinische Anwendung

  • Chapter
Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks

  • 525 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Avci S et al (1998) 2-to 10-years follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects: J Arthroplasty 13: 61–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azuma T et al. (1994) Compressed allograft chips for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty: JBJS 76-B: 740–744

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barden B et al. (2001) Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty. CORR 387: 148–155

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackley HRL et al. (2001) Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip. JBJS 83-A: 346–354

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boldt JG et al. (2001) Revision total hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting with cemented nonpolished stems and Charnley cups. J Arthroplasty 16: 943–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewster NT et al. (1999) Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting. JBJS 81-B: 118–124

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chandler H et al. (1995) Acetabular reconstruction using structural grafts in total hip replacement: A 12 1/2 year follow-up: Sem Arthroplasty 6: 118–130

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandler HP, Tigges RG (1997) The role of allografts in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. JBJS 79-A: 1422–1432

    Google Scholar 

  9. Donk S van der et al. (2002) Incorpation of morselized bone Grafts: A study of 24 acetabular biopsy specimens. CORR 396: 131–141

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donk S van der et al. (2003) Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth. CORR 408: 302–310

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunlop DG et al. (2003) Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft. JBJS A85: 639–646

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards SA et al. (2003) Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty 18: 852–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eldridge JD et al. (1997) Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12: 535–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gie GA, Ling RS (1999) Femoral bone grafting: Intramedullary impaction grafting. In: Steinberg M, Garino J (eds) Rev. total hip arthroplasty, Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gill TJ et al. (1998) The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty. JBJS 80-B:946–953

    Google Scholar 

  16. Graham NM, Stockley I (2004) The use of structural proximal femoral allografts in complex revision hip arthroplasty. JBJS 86-B: 337–343

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gross AE et al. (2002) The use of allografts in orthopaedic surgery: Part II. The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. JBJS 84-A: 655–667

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haddad FS et al.(1999) Acetabular reconstruction with morcellized allograft and ring support. J Arthoplasty 14: 788–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haddad FS et al. (2000) Circumferential allograft replacement of the proximal femur: A critical analysis. CORR 371: 98–107

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haddad FS et al. (2002) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: Use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. JBJS 84-A: 945–950

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halliday BR et al. (2003) Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement: JBJS 85-B: 809–817

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hamer AJ et al. (1997) Histologic evidence of cortical allograft bone incorporation in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty 12: 785–789

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Head WC, Malinin TI (2000) Results of onlay allografts. CORR 371: 108–112

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hooten J.P. et al. (1994): Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty: JBJS 76-B: 419:422

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hooten JP et al. (1996) Structural bulk allografts in acetabular reconstruction: analysis of two grafts retrieved at post-mortem. JBJS 78-B: 270

    Google Scholar 

  26. Höstner J et al. (2001) Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component. J Arthroplasty 16: 76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kerboull M et al. (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. CORR 378: 155–168

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kwong LM et al. (1993) High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstruction at 10 years. J Arthroplasty 8: 341–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leopold MSS, Rosenberg AG (1999) Current status of impaction allografting for revision of a femoral component. JBJS 81-A: 1337–1345

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leopold SS et al. (1999) Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. JBJS 81-A: 1080–1092

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leopold SS et al. (1999) Acetabular revision — cementless acetabular revision. CORR 369: 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  32. Masterson EL et al. (1997) The cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. JBJS 79-B: 908–913

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nelissen RG et al. (2002) Factors associated with excessive migration in bone impaction hip revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 17: 826–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ornstein E et al. (2002) Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. JBJS 84-A: 1323–1328

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pakkarinen J et al. (2000) Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. JBJS 82-B: 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paprosky WG, Sekundiak TD (1999) Acetabular bone grafting: Structural Grafts. In: Steinberg M, Garino J (eds) Rev. total hip arthroplasty. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 233–247

    Google Scholar 

  37. Perka C, Ludwig R (2001) Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. J Arthroplasty 16: 568–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Piccaluga F et al. (2002) Revision of the femoral prosthesis with impaction allografting and a Charnley stem. JBJS 84-B: 544–549

    Google Scholar 

  39. Piriou P et al. (2003) Acetabular component revision with frozen massive structural pelvis allograft. J Arthroplasty 18: 562–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saleh KJ et al. (2000) Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring. J Arthroplasty 15: 951–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmalzried TP et al. (1998) The fate of pelvic osteolysis after reoperation. CORR 350: 128–137

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schreurs WW et al. (2004) Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. JBJS 86-B: 492–497

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shinar AA, Harris WH (1997) Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. JBJS 79-A: 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  44. Silverton CD et al. (1996) Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. JBJS 78-A: 1366–1370

    Google Scholar 

  45. Somers JFA et al. (2002) Block allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17: 562–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ullmark G, Nilsson O (1999) Impacted corticocancellous allografts. J Arthroplasty 14: 1019–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ullmark G, Obrant KJ (2002) Histology of impacted bone-graft incorporation. J Arthroplasty 17: 150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Van Doorn WJ et al. (2002) Migration of the femoral stem after impaction bone grafting: JBJS 84-B: 825–831

    Google Scholar 

  49. Winter E et al. (2001): Allogenic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider Ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. JBJS 83-A: 862–867

    Google Scholar 

  50. Young SK et al. (1991) Factors related to failure of structural bone grafts in acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6: 73–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J.G. Fitzek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Barden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Schloss-Str. 85, 40477, Düsseldorf

    Peter Thümler (Professor, Dr. med.) (Professor, Dr. med.)

  2. Erlangen-Nürnberg, Rathsberger Str. 57, 91054, Erlangen

    Raimund Forst (Professor, Dr. med.) (Professor, Dr. med.)

  3. Rummelsberg 71, 90592, Schwarzenbruck

    Günther Zeiler (Professor, Dr. med.) (Professor, Dr. med.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitzek, J., Barden, B. (2005). Knochentransplantate: Klinische Anwendung. In: Thümler, P., Forst, R., Zeiler, G. (eds) Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26803-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26803-0_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20060-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26803-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation