Skip to main content

Comparison of Superconducting Gravimeter and CHAMP Satellite Derived Temporal Gravity Variations

  • Chapter
Earth Observation with CHAMP

Summary

The operational Superconducting Gravimeter (SG) network can play an important role for validation of satellite-derived temporal gravity field variations. A comparison shows a quite good agreement between SG and CHAMP results within their estimated error bars. It could be proved that the SG-derived temporal gravity variations are representative for a large area within the µgal accuracy, if the local gravity effects are removed.. The long-periodic tidal waves are well determined by ground measurements, therefore they can be applied as a reference for validation. For further validation, field SG measurements should be carried out in representative areas with large gravity variations (e.g. Amazon area).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Crossley D, Hinderer J (2002) GGP Ground Truth for Satellite Missions. Marees Terrestres Bulletin d'Informations, Bruxelles 136: 10,735–10,742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis O, Mazzega P (1990) Global charts of ocean tides loading effects. J Geophys Res 95(C7): 11411–11424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DD (2000) IERS conventions 2000, International Earth Rotation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeyer J, Barthelmes F, Wolf D (1999) Estimates of environmental effects in Superconducting Gravimeter data. Marees Terrestres d'Informations, Bruxelles 131: 10,153–10,159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigber Ch, Schwintzer P, Neumayer K-H, Barthelmes F, König R, Förste Ch, Balmino G, Biancale R, Lemoine J-M, Loyer S, Bruinsma S, Perosanz F, Fayard T (2003) The CHAMP-only Earth Gravity Field Model EIGEN-2. Adv Space Res 31(8): 1883–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torge W (1989) Gravimetry. de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel H-G (1996) Earth tide data processing package ETERNA 3.3. Marees Terrestres Bulletin d'Informations, Bruxelles 124: 9425–9439.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neumeyer, J. et al. (2005). Comparison of Superconducting Gravimeter and CHAMP Satellite Derived Temporal Gravity Variations. In: Reigber, C., Lühr, H., Schwintzer, P., Wickert, J. (eds) Earth Observation with CHAMP. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26800-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics