Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
ANAES (2002) Classification en six catégories des images mammographiques en fonction du degré de suspicion de leur caractère pathologique (en dehors des images constituées et des variantes du normal). Correspondance avec le système BIRADS de l’American College of Radiology (ACR). ANAES, service des recommandations et références professionnelles.
Balu-Maestro C, Chapellier C (2001) Diagnostic échographique des lésions mammaires. Encycl Med Chir Gynécologie 810 G-17: 7
Balu-Maestro, Chapellier C, Bleuse A et al. (2002) Diagnostic échographique des lésions mammaires. Feuillets de cancérologie 42,3: 179–90
Balu-Maestro C, Chapellier C, Bleuse A et al. (2003) Place de l’échographie dans le dépistage du cancer du sein. Le Sein: 127–34
Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L et al. (2001) Sreening Program Wog Group. Short-term follow-up in 795 nonpalpable probably begnin lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology: May; 219(2): 475–83
Mendelson EB, Berg WA, Merritt CR (2001) Toward a standardized breast ultrasound lexicon. BI-RADS: ultrason. Semin Roentgenol Jul; 36(3): 217–25
Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology Oct; 225(1): 165–75
Buchberger W, DeKoeckoek-Doll P, Springer P et al. (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol Oct; 173(4): 921–7
Venta LA, Kim JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M (1999) Management of complex breast cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(5): 1331–6
Balu-Maestro C, Chapellier C, Chauvel C et al. (2000) Echographie ganglionnaire axillaire. Le Sein 230–6
Sickles EA (1999) Probably begnin breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol? Radiology Oct; 213(1): 11–4
Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH (1992) Nonpalpable probably begnin lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology Aug; 184(2): 409–14
Helvie MA, Pennes DR, Rebner M, Adler DD (1991) Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield. Radiography Janv; 178(1): 155–8
Caplan LS, Blackman D, Nadel M, Monticciolo DL (1999) Coding mammograms using the classification “probably begnin finding-short interval follow-up suggested”. AJR. Am J Roentgenol Feb; 172(2): 339–42
Revelon G, Sherman ME, Gatewood OM, Brem RF (2000) Focal fibrosis of the breast: imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation. Radiology Jul; 216(1): 255–9
Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC (1999) BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology Jun; 211(3): 845–50
Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH et al. (2000) US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology Dec; 217(3): 849–54
Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL, Vo TT (2002) Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol Apr; 178(4): 1007–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag France, Paris
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balu-Maestro, C. (2006). Mammographie et échographie : score ACR et conduite à tenir. In: Cancer du sein. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-31109-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-31109-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-25174-0
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-31109-3