Abstract
In a broad sense, any findings can be called incidental that occur in the context of medical diagnostics and that potentially affect the health (including the reproductive capacities) of a living being – if the diagnostic means were not intended to produce such findings. It would be wrong to only talk about an incidental finding once the relevance for the health or reproductive capacity of the concerned individual has been established. The concept of an incidental finding rather includes – in its broad as well as narrow sense, which will be explained in the next paragraph – both marginal findings with no clinical relevance and false positive findings. This use of the concept makes sense, because the artefactual character of false positive findings in particular usually only becomes clear after further evaluation. Since this evaluation would not take place without the misleading primary finding, the concept of a finding cannot plausibly depend on the factual correctness or clinical relevance of diagnostic discoveries.
This chapter is derived from my handbook entry Schmücker (2013).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alphs HH, Schwartz BS et al (2006) Findings on brain MRI from research studies of occupational exposure to known neurotoxicants. Am J Roentgenol 187:1043–1047
Gupta SN, Belay B (2008) Intracranial incidental findings on brain MR images in a pediatric neurology practice: a retrospective study. J Neurol Sci 264:34–37
Heinemann T, Hoppe C et al (2007) Zufallsbefunde bei bildgebenden Verfahren in der Hirnforschung: Ethische Überlegungen und Lösungsvorschläge. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 104:A-1982/B-1748/C-1684
Heinemann T, Hoppe C et al (2009) Ethisch angemessener Umgang mit Zufallsfunden bei bildgebenden Verfahren in der Hirnforschung. – Leitlinienvorschlag – (19. Juni 2009) http://www.psychologie.hu-berlin.de/institut/intra/ethik/Leitlinie%20Zufallsfunde
Illes J, Kirschen MP et al (2006) Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science 311:783–784
Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ (1999) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. J Am Med Assoc 282:36–39
Langanke M, Erdmann P (2011) Die MRT als wissenschaftliche Studienuntersuchung und das Problem der Mitteilung von Zufallsbefunden. Probandenethische Herausforderungen. In: Theißen H, Langanke M (eds) Tragfähige Rede von Gott. Festgabe für Heinrich Assel zum 50. Geburtstag. Dr Kovac, Hamburg, pp 197–240
Rangel EK (2010) The Management of Incidental Findings in Neuro-Imaging Research: Framework and Recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 38:117–126
Schleim S, Spranger TM et al (2007) Zufallsfunde in der bildgebenden Hirnforschung. Empirische, rechtliche und ethische Aspekte. Nervenheilkunde 26:1041–1045
Schmücker R (2013) Zufallsbefunde – was gebietet die Menschenwürde? In: Joerden JC, Hilgendorf E, Thiele F (2013) Menschenwürde und Medizin. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 949–981
Vernooij MW, Ikram MA et al (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357:1821–1828
Weber F, Knopf H (2006) Incidental findings in magnetic resonance imaging of the brains of healthy young men. J Neurol Sci 240:81–84
Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP et al (2008) Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 36:219–248
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmücker, R. (2016). Incidental Findings: Definition of the Concept. In: Weckbach, S. (eds) Incidental Radiological Findings. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2016_96
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2016_96
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42579-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42581-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)