Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Self-organization and Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks

  • Conference paper
Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN 2006)

Abstract

In this article, we compare two self-organization and hierarchical routing protocols for ad hoc networks. These two protocols apply the reverse approach from the classical one, since they use a reactive routing protocol inside the clusters and a proactive routing protocol between the clusters. We compare them regarding the cluster organization they provide and the routing that is then performed over it. This study gives an idea of the impact of the use of recursiveness and of the partition of the DHT on self-organization and hierarchical routing in ad hoc networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Araujo, F., Rodrigues, L., Kaiser, J., Changling, L., Mitidieri, C.: CHR: A Distributed Hash Table for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: DEBS 2005, Columbus, Ohio, USA (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blazevic, L., Giordano, S., Le Boudec, J.-Y.: Self-organized Terminode routing. Journal of Cluster Computing 5(2) (April 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, B., Morris, R.: L+: Scalable landmark routing and address lookup for multi-hop wireless networks. Mit lcs technical report 837, MIT ( March 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, G., Garcia, F., Solano, J., Stojmenovic, I.: Connectivity-based k-hop clustering in wireless networks. In: HICSS 2002, Hawaii, USA (January 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y.P., Liestman, A.L., Liu, J.: Clustering algorithms for Ad Hoc wireless networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, B.N., Colbourn, C.J., Johnson, D.S.: Unit disk graphs. Discrete Math. 86(1-3), 165–177 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Krishna, P., Vaidya, N.H., Chatterjee, M., Pradhan, D.K.: A cluster based approach for routing in dynamic networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM, pp. 49–65. ACM Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kwak, B.-J., Song, N.-O., Miller, L.E.: On the scalability of ad hoc networks. Communications Letters, IEEE 8, 503–505 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, C.R., Gerla, M.: Adaptive clustering for mobile wireless networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications 15(7), 1265–1275 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitton, N., Busson, A., Fleury, E.: Self-organization in large scale ad hoc networks. In: MED-HOC-NET 2004, Bodrum, Turkey (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitton, N., Fleury, É.: Distributed node location in clustered multi-hop wireless networks. In: Cho, K., Jacquet, P. (eds.) AINTEC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3837, pp. 112–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitton, N., Fleury, E.: Efficient broadcasting in self-organizing multi-hop wireless network. In: Ad Hoc Now 2005, Cancun, Mexico (October 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitton, N., Fleury, E., Guérin-Lassous, I., Tixeuil, S.: Self-stabilization in self-organized multihop wireless networks. In: WWAN 2005, Columbus, Ohio, USA (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Niculescu, D., Nath, B.: Ad hoc positioning system (APS). In: Proceedings of GLOBECOM 2001 (November 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nikaein, N., Labiod, H., Bonnet, C.: DDR-distributed dynamic routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. In: Mobhihoc 2000, Boston, MA, USA, November 20, 2000, ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perkins, C.E.: Ad hoc networking. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riedi, R., Druschel, P., Hu, Y.C., Johnson, D.B., Baraniuk, R.: SAFARI: A self-organizing hierarchical architecture for scalable ad hoc networking networking. Research report TR04-433, Rice University (February 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Santivanez, C.A., McDonald, B., Stavrakakis, I., Ramanathan, R.R.: On the scalability of ad hoc routing protocols. In: INFOCOM, New York, USA (June 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Leeuven, J., Tan, R.: Interval routing. The computer Journal 30, 298–307 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Viana, A.C., de Armorim, M.D., Fdida, S., de Rezende, J.F.: Self-organization in spontaneous networks: the approach of DHT-based routing protocols. Ad Hoc Networks Journal (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goncalves, B.S.A., Mitton, N., Guérin-Lassous, I. (2006). Comparison of Two Self-organization and Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. In: Cao, J., Stojmenovic, I., Jia, X., Das, S.K. (eds) Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks. MSN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4325. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11943952_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11943952_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49932-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49933-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics