Skip to main content

An Analysis of the Shapley Value and Its Uncertainty for the Voting Game

  • Conference paper
Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. Designing Trading Agents and Mechanisms (AMEC 2005, TADA 2005)

Abstract

The Shapley value provides a unique solution to coalition games and is used to evaluate a player’s prospects of playing a game. Although it provides a unique solution, there is an element of uncertainty associated with this value. This uncertainty in the solution of a game provides an additional dimension for evaluating a player’s prospects of playing the game. Thus, players want to know not only their Shapley value for a game, but also the associated uncertainty. Given this, our objective is to determine the Shapley value and its uncertainty and study the relationship between them for the voting game. But since the problem of determining the Shapley value for this game is #P-complete, we first present a new polynomial time randomized method for determining the approximate Shapley value. Using this method, we compute the Shapley value and correlate it with its uncertainty so as to allow agents to compare games on the basis of both their Shapley values and the associated uncertainties. Our study shows that, a player’s uncertainty first increases with its Shapley value and then decreases. This implies that the uncertainty is at its minimum when the value is at its maximum, and that agents do not always have to compromise value in order to reduce uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deng, X., Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research 19(2), 257–266 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Francis, A.: Advanced Level Statistics. Stanley Thornes Publishers (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harsanyi, J.C.: Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kargin, V.: Uncertainty of the Shapley value. International Game Theory Review (to appear, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mann, I., Shapley, L.S.: The bargaining problem. Technical report, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mann, I., Shapley, L.S.: The bargaining problem. Technical report, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Roth, A.E.: The Shapley value as a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility. Econometrica 45(3), 657–664 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Roth, A.E.: The expected utility of playing a game. In: Roth, A.E. (ed.) The Shapley value, pp. 51–70. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandholm, T., Lesser, V.: Coalitions among computationally bounded agents. Artificial Intelligence Journal 94(1), 99–137 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. In: Roth, A.E. (ed.) The Shapley value, pp. 31–40. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence Journal 101(2), 165–200 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R. (2006). An Analysis of the Shapley Value and Its Uncertainty for the Voting Game. In: La Poutré, H., Sadeh, N.M., Janson, S. (eds) Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce. Designing Trading Agents and Mechanisms. AMEC TADA 2005 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3937. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11888727_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11888727_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46242-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46243-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics