Skip to main content

DNF Are Teachable in the Average Case

  • Conference paper
Learning Theory (COLT 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4005))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study the average number of well-chosen labeled examples that are required for a helpful teacher to uniquely specify a target function within a concept class. This “average teaching dimension” has been studied in learning theory and combinatorics and is an attractive alternative to the “worst-case” teaching dimension of Goldman and Kearns [7] which is exponential for many interesting concept classes. Recently Balbach [3] showed that the classes of 1-decision lists and 2-term DNF each have linear average teaching dimension.

As our main result, we extend Balbach’s teaching result for 2-term DNF by showing that for any 1 ≤s ≤2\(^{\Theta({\it n})}\), the well-studied concept classes of at-most-s-term DNF and at-most-s-term monotone DNF each have average teaching dimension O(ns). The proofs use detailed analyses of the combinatorial structure of “most” DNF formulas and monotone DNF formulas. We also establish asymptotic separations between the worst-case and average teaching dimension for various other interesting Boolean concept classes such as juntas and sparse GF 2 polynomials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alekhnovich, M., Braverman, M., Feldman, V., Klivans, A., Pitassi, T.: Learnability and automatizability. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 621–630 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anthony, M., Brightwell, G., Shawe-Taylor, J.: On specifying Boolean functions by labelled examples. Discrete Applied Math. 61(1), 1–25 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Balbach, F.J.: Teaching classes with high teaching dimension using few examples. In: Auer, P., Meir, R. (eds.) COLT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3559, pp. 668–683. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, A.: Learning a function of r relevant variables (open problem). In: Proc. 16th Annual COLT, pp. 731–733 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bshouty, N., Mansour, Y.: Simple Learning Algorithms for Decision Trees and Multivariate Polynomials. SIAM J. Comput. 31(6), 1909–1925 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherniavsky, J., Statman, R.: Testing: An abstract approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Software Testing (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman, S., Kearns, M.: On the complexity of teaching. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 50(1), 20–31 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman, S., Rivest, R., Schapire, R.: Learning binary relations and total orders. SIAM Journal on Computing 22(5), 1006–1034 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhlmann, C.: On teaching and learning intersection-closed concept classes. In: Fischer, P., Simon, H.U. (eds.) EuroCOLT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1572, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kushilevitz, E., Linial, N., Rabinovich, Y., Saks, M.: Witness sets for families of binary vectors. J. Combinatorial Theory 73(2), 376–380 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, H., Servedio, R., Wan, A.: DNF are Teachable in the Average Case (full version), available at: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~rocco/papers/dnfteach.html

  12. Mossel, E., O’Donnell, R., Servedio, R.: Learning functions of k relevant variables. J. Comput. & Syst. Sci. 69(3), 421–434 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Roth, R., Benedek, G.: Interpolation and approximation of sparse multivariate polynomials over GF(2). SIAM J. Comput. 20(2), 291–314 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Schapire, R., Sellie, L.: Learning sparse multivariate polynomials over a field with queries and counterexamples. J. Comput. & Syst. Sci. 52(2), 201–213 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Seroussi, G., Bshouty, N.: Vector sets for exhaustive testing of logic circuits. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 34(3), 513–522 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, H.K., Servedio, R.A., Wan, A. (2006). DNF Are Teachable in the Average Case. In: Lugosi, G., Simon, H.U. (eds) Learning Theory. COLT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11776420_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11776420_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35294-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35296-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics