Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3944))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes the Bar-Ilan system participating in the Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. The paper proposes first a general probabilistic setting that formalizes the notion of textual entailment. We then describe a concrete alignment-based model for lexical entailment, which utilizes web co-occurrence statistics in a bag of words representation. Finally, we report the results of the model on the Recognising Textual Entailment challenge dataset along with some analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacchus, F.: Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Haim, R., Szpektor, I., Glickman, O.: Definition and Analysis of Intermediate Entailment Levels. In: ACL 2005 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bos, J., Markert, K.: Recognising Textual Entailment with Robust Logical Inference. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., et al. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 404–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, P.F., Della Pietra, V.J., Della Pietra, S.A., Mercer, R.L.: The Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation: Parameter Estimation. Computational Linguistics 19(2), 263–311 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chierchia, G., McConnell-Ginet, S.: Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corley, C., Mihalcea, R.: Measuring the Semantic Similarity of Texts. In: ACL 2005 Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dagan, I., Glickman, O.: Probabilistic Textual Entailment: Generic Applied Modeling of Language Variability. In: PASCAL workshop on Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., et al. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 404–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geffet, M., Dagan, I.: Feature Vector Quality and Distributional Similarity. In: Coling 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geffet, M., Dagan, I.: The Distributional Inclusion Hypotheses and Lexical Entailment. In: ACL 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glickman, O., Dagan, I.: Identifying Lexical Paraphrases From a Single Corpus: A Case Study for Verbs. In: Recent Advantages in Natural Language Processing, RANLP (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glickman, O., Dagan, I., Koppel, M.: A Probabilistic Classification Approach for Lexical Textual Entailment. In: Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halpern, J.Y.: An analysis of first-order logics of probability. Artificial Intelligence 46, 311–350 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jijkoun, V., de Rijke, M.: Recognizing Textual Entailment: Is Lexical Similarity Enough? In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds.) MLCW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3944, pp. 449–460. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Miller, G.: Using corpus statistics and wordnet relations for sense disambiguation. Computational Linguistics 24(1), 147–165 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, D.: Automatic Retrieval and Clustering of Similar Words. In: COLING-ACL (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A Lexical Databases for English. CACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Monz, C., de Rijke, M.: Light-Weight Entailment Checking for Computational Semantics. In: Proc. of the third workshop on inference in computational semantics, ICoS-3 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ponte, J.M., Croft, W.B.: A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval. In: SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saggion, H., Gaizauskas, R., Hepple, M., Roberts, I., Greenwood, M.: Exploring the Performance of Boolean Retrieval Strategies for Open Domain Question Answering. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Retrieval for Question Answering, SIGIR 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Glickman, O., Dagan, I., Koppel, M. (2006). A Lexical Alignment Model for Probabilistic Textual Entailment. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds) Machine Learning Challenges. Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognising Tectual Entailment. MLCW 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3944. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736790_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11736790_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33428-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics