Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3944))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper addresses Textual Entailment (i.e. recognizing that the meaning of a text entails the meaning of another text) using a Tree Edit Distance algorithm between the syntactic trees of the two texts. A key aspect of the approach is the estimation of the cost for the editing operations (i.e. Insertion, Deletion, Substitution) among words.

The aim of the paper is to compare the contribution of two different lexical resources for recognizing textual entailment: WordNet and a word-similarity database. In both cases we derive entailment rules that are used by the Tree Edit Distance Algorithm. We carried out a number of experiments over the PASCAL-RTE dataset in order to estimate the contribution of different combinations of the available resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayer, S., Burger, J., Ferro, L., Henderson, J., Yeh, A.: MITRE’s Submissions to the EU Pascal RTE Challenge. In: Proceedings of PASCAL Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures. In: Workshop on WordNet and other Lexical Resources, Second meeting of the Nord American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dagan, I., Glickman, O.: Generic applied modeling of language variability. In: Proceedings of PASCAL Workshop on Learning Methods for Text Understanding and Mining, Grenoble (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., Magnini, B.: The PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In: Proceedings of PASCAL Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet, an electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Harabagiu, S., Miller, G., Moldovan, D.: WordNet 2 - A morphologically and Semantically Enhanced Resource. In: Proceeding of ACL-SIGLEX 1999, Marylend (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera, J., Peñas, A., Verdejo, F.: Textual Entailment Recognition Based on Dependency Analysis and WordNet. In: Proceedings of PASCAL Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jijkoun, V., de Rijke, M.: Recognizing Textual Entailment Using Lexical Similarity. In: Proceedings of PASCAL Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment Southampton, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, D.: Dependency-based evaluation of MINIPAR. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of Parsing Systems at LREC 1998, Granada, Spain (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, D.: An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, Wisconsin (July 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Discovery of inference rules for Question Answering. Natural Language Engineering 7(4), 343–360 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moldovan, D., Rus, V.: Logic Form Transformation and it’s Applicability in Question Answering. In: Proceedings of ACL 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moldovan, D., Harabagio, S., Girju, R., Morarescu, P., Lacatsu, F., Novischi, A.: A LCC Tools for Question Answering. In: NIST Special Publication: SP 500-251 The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2002-2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monz, C., de Rijke, M.: Light-Weight Entailment Checking for Computational Semantics. In: The third workshop on inference in computational semantics (ICoS-3) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J.: WordNet:Similarity- Measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: AAAI 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., Yih, W.-t.: Mapping Dependencies Trees: An Application to Question Answering. In: Proceedings of AI & Math (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raina, R., Haghighi, A., Cox, C., Finkel, J., Michels, J., Toutanova Bill MacCartney, K., de Marneffe, M.-C., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y.: Robust Textual Inference using Diverse Knowledge Sources. In: Proceedings of PASCAL Workshop on Recognizing Textual Entailment, Southampton, UK (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ratnaparkhi, A.: A Maximum Entropy Part-Of-Speech Tagger. In: Proceeding of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference, May 17-18 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szpektor, I., Tanev, H., Dagan, I., Coppola, B.: Scaling Web-based Acquisition of Entailment Relations. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2004 – Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Barcelona (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, K., Shasha, D.: Fast algorithm for the unit cost editing distance between trees. Journal of Algorithms 11, 1245–1262 (1990)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kouylekov, M., Magnini, B. (2006). Combining Lexical Resources with Tree Edit Distance for Recognizing Textual Entailment. In: Quiñonero-Candela, J., Dagan, I., Magnini, B., d’Alché-Buc, F. (eds) Machine Learning Challenges. Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognising Tectual Entailment. MLCW 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3944. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736790_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11736790_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33427-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33428-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics