Skip to main content

Sequences of Part of Speech Tags vs. Sequences of Phrase Labels: How Do They Help in Parsing?

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3878))

  • 1379 Accesses

Abstract

We compare the contributions made by sequences of part of speech tags and sequences of phrase labels for the task of grammatical relation finding. Both are used for grammar induction, and we show that English labels of grammatical relations follow a very strict sequential order, but not as strict as POS tags, resulting in better performance of the latter on the relation finding task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collins, M.: Three generative, lexicalized models for statistical parsing. In: Proc. 35th ACL (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eisner, J.: Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In: Proc. COLING 1996 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Infante-Lopez, G., de Rijke, M.: Alternative approaches for generating bodies of grammar rules. In: Proc. 42nd ACL (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, M.: Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, PA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charniak, E.: Tree-bank Grammars. In: Proceedings AAAI 1996, Portland, Oregon (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Infante-Lopez, G.: Two-Level Probabilistic Grammars for Natural Language Parsing. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buchholz, S.: Memory-Based Grammatical Relation Finding. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Tilburg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abney, S., McAllester, D., Pereira, F.: Relating probabilistic grammars and automata. In: Proc. 37th ACL, pp. 542–549 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manning, C., Schütze, H.: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Thollard, F., Dupont, P., de la Higuera, C.: Probabilistic DFA inference using Kullback-Leibler divergence and minimality. In: Proc. ICML, Stanford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Infante-Lopez, G., de Rijke, M. (2006). Sequences of Part of Speech Tags vs. Sequences of Phrase Labels: How Do They Help in Parsing?. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3878. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11671299_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11671299_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32205-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32206-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics