Skip to main content

On the (Im)possibility of Blind Message Authentication Codes

  • Conference paper
Topics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 2006 (CT-RSA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3860))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Blind signatures allow a signer to digitally sign a document without being able to glean any information about the document. In this paper, we investigate the symmetric analog of blind signatures, namely blind message authentication codes (blind MACs). One may hope to get the same efficiency gain from blind MAC constructions as is usually obtained when moving from asymmetric to symmetric cryptosystems. Our main result is a negative one however: we show that the natural symmetric analogs of the unforgeability and blindness requirements cannot be simultaneously satisfied. Faced with this impossibility, we show that blind MACs do exist (under the one-more RSA assumption in the random oracle model) in a more restrictive setting where users can share common state information. Our construction, however, is only meant to demonstrate the existence; it uses an underlying blind signature scheme, and hence does not achieve the desired performance benefits. The construction of an efficient blind MAC scheme in this restrictive setting is left as an open problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdalla, M., Namprempre, C., Neven, G.: On the (im)possibility of blind message authentication codes. Full version of current paper. Available from authors’ web pages

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abe, M.: A secure three-move blind signature scheme for polynomially many signatures. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 136–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, M., Kayal, N., Saxena, N.: PRIMES is in P (August. 2002), http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/manindra/primality.ps

  4. Bellare, M., Namprempre, C., Pointcheval, D., Semanko, M.: The one-more-RSA-inversion problems and the security of Chaum’s blind signature scheme. Journal of Cryptology 16(3), 185–215 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Boldyreva, A.: Threshold signatures, multisignatures and blind signatures based on the gap-Diffie-Hellman-group signature scheme. In: Desmedt, Y. (ed.) PKC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2567, pp. 31–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Camenisch, J., Koprowski, M., Warinschi, B.: Efficient blind signatures without random oracles. In: Blundo, C., Cimato, S. (eds.) SCN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3352, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Chaum, D., Rivest, R.L., Sherman, A.T. (eds.) Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 1982, pp. 199–203, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. Plenum Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chaum, D.: Blind signature system. In: Chaum, D. (ed.) Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO, pp. 153, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. Plenum Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaum, D., Fiat, A., Naor, M.: Untraceable electronic cash. In: Goldwasser, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1988. LNCS, vol. 403, pp. 319–327. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fujioka, A., Okamoto, T., Ohta, K.: A practical secret voting scheme for large scale elections. In: Seberry, J., Pieprzyk, J. (eds.) AUSCRYPT 1992. LNCS, vol. 718, pp. 244–251. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., Rivest, R.L.: A digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks. SIAM Journal on Computing 17(2), 281–308 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Juels, A., Luby, M., Ostrovsky, R.: Security of blind digital signatures (Extended abstract). In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 150–164. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Okamoto, T.: Receipt-free electronic voting schemes for large scale elections. In: Christianson, B., Crispo, B., Lomas, T.M.A., Roe, M. (eds.) Security Protocols 1997. LNCS, vol. 1361, pp. 25–35. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinkas, B.: Fair secure two-party computation. In: Biham, E. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2656, pp. 87–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Security arguments for digital signatures and blind signatures. Journal of Cryptology 13(3), 361–396 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenmakers, B.: Personal Communication (August 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yao, A.C.: Protocols for secure computations. In: 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Chicago, Illinois, November 3–5, pp. 160–164. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdalla, M., Namprempre, C., Neven, G. (2006). On the (Im)possibility of Blind Message Authentication Codes. In: Pointcheval, D. (eds) Topics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 2006. CT-RSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3860. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11605805_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11605805_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31033-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32648-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics