Abstract
During conversation, people often make assumptions or suppositions that are not explicitly stated. Failure to identify these suppositions may lead to mis-communication. In this paper, we describe a procedure that postulates such suppositions in the context of the discourse interpretation mechanism of BIAS – a Bayesian Interactive Argumentation System. When a belief mentioned in a user’s discourse differs from that obtained in BIAS’ user model, our procedure searches for suppositions that explain this belief, preferring suppositions that depart minimally from the beliefs in the user model. Once a set of suppositions has been selected, it can be presented to the user for validation. Our procedure was evaluated by means of a web-based trial. Our results show that the assumptions posited by BIAS are considered sensible by our trial subjects.
This research was supported in part by the ARC Centre for Perceptive and Intelligent Machines in Complex Environments. The authors thank David Albrecht and Yuval Marom for their help with the analysis of the evaluation results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
George, S., Zukerman, I.: An anytime algorithm for interpreting arguments. In: Zhang, C., Guesgen, H.W., Yeap, W.-K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3157, pp. 311–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Gurney, J., Perlis, D., Purang, K.: Interpreting presuppositions using active logic: From contexts to utterances. Computational Intelligence 13(3), 391–413 (1997)
Kaplan, S.J.: Cooperative responses from a portable natural language query system. Artificial Intelligence 19, 165–187 (1982)
Mercer, R.E.: Presuppositions and default reasoning: A study in lexical pragmatics. In: Pustejovsky, J., Bergler, S. (eds.) SIGLEX 1991. LNCS, vol. 627, pp. 321–339. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)
Motro, A.: SEAVE: a mechanism for verifying user presuppositions in query systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 4(4), 312–330 (1986)
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1988)
Zukerman, I., George, S.: A probabilistic approach for argument interpretation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Special Issue on Language-Based Interaction (2005)
Zukerman, I., George, S., George, M.: Incorporating a user model into an information theoretic framework for argument interpretation. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2702, pp. 106–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Zukerman, I., Niemann, M., George, S.: Improving the presentation of argument interpretations based on user trials. In: Webb, G.I., Yu, X. (eds.) AI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3339, pp. 587–598. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
George, S., Zukerman, I., Niemann, M. (2005). Modeling Suppositions in Users’ Arguments. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrovic, A. (eds) User Modeling 2005. UM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3538. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27885-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31878-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)