Skip to main content

Local and Global Complete Solution Learning Methods for QBF

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3569))

  • 1022 Accesses

Abstract

Solvers for Quantified Boolean Formulae (QBF) use many analogues of technique from SAT. A significant amount of work has gone into extending conflict based techniques such as conflict learning to solution learning, which is irrelevant in SAT but can play a large role in success in QBF. Unfortunately, solution learning techniques have not been highly successful to date. We argue that one reason for this is that solution learning techniques have been ‘incomplete’. That is, not all the information implied in a solution is learnt. We introduce two new techniques for learning as much as possible from solutions, and we call them complete methods. The two methods contrast in how long they keep information. One, Complete Local Solution Learning, discards solutions on backtracking past a previous existential variable. The other, Complete Global Solution Learning, keeps solutions indefinitely. Our detailed experimental analysis suggests that both can improve search over standard solution learning, while the local method seems to offer a more suitable tradeoff than global learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kleine Buning, H., Karpinski, M., Flögel, A.: Resolution for quantified boolean formulas. Information and Computation 117, 12–18 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cadoli, M., Schaerf, M., Giovanardi, A., Giovanardi, M.: An algorithm to evaluate quantified boolean formulae and its experimental evaluation. Journal of Automated Reasoning 28(2), 101–142 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem-proving. Commun. ACM 5(7), 394–397 (1962)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gent, I., Rowley, A.: Solution learning and solution directed backjumping revisited. Technical Report APES-80-2004, APES Research Group (2004), http://www.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~apes/apesreports.html

  5. Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Tacchella, A.: Learning for quantified Boolean logic satisfiability. In: Proc. AAAI 2002, pp. 649–654. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Tacchella, A.: Backjumping for quantified boolean logic satisfiability. Artificial Intelligence 145(1–2), 99–120 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Letz, R.: Lemma and model caching in decision procedures for quantified boolean formulas. In: Egly, U., Fermüller, C. (eds.) TABLEAUX 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2381, pp. 160–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Prosser, P.: Hybrid algorithms for the constraint satisfaction problem. Computational Intelligence 9(3), 268–299 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Conflict driven learning in a quantified boolean satisfiability solver. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design, pp. 442–449. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Towards a symmetric treatment of satisfaction and conflicts in quantified boolean formula evaluation. In: Dechter, R. (ed.) CP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1894, pp. 200–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gent, I.P., Rowley, A.G.D. (2005). Local and Global Complete Solution Learning Methods for QBF. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing. SAT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3569. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11499107_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26276-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31679-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics