Skip to main content

Landscape Ecological Approach In Oil Palm Land Use Planning And Management For Forest Conservation In Malaysia

  • Chapter
Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas

Abstract

Oil palm industry is one of the major revenue for economic development in Malaysia. Oil palm was introduced to Malaysia in 1911 and the first commercial planting began in 1917. Since then and combined with increasing demand of its product both at the local and international market, areas planted with oil palm has been expanded throughout the nation. In 2004, oil palm plantation covered approximately 9.9% of the total Malaysian land area. However, its expansion has been recognised intrude into forested areas. This situation has been debated as one of the major international issues that cause forest degradation and loss of biodiversity. To balance between economic importance and conservation of forested areas a practical approach in planning and managing oil palm land use is necessary. Landscape ecological approach is an emerging pathway to achieve the goal and increasingly recognised as tool in various aspects of planning and managing land use. In this chapter, the land use changes of this premier man-influenced area in Malaysia will be analysed. How landscape ecology concepts can be integratedinto planning and managing oil palm land use for forest conservation in Malaysia will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdullah, A.R. 1995. Environmental pollution in Malaysia: trends and prospects. Trends in Analytical Chemistry,14, 191-198.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, S.A. 2003. Fragmented forest in tropical landscape: the case of the state of Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Sciences,15, 267-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, S.A. and Nakagoshi, N. 2006. Changes in landscape spatial pattern in the highly developing state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning77, 263-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azrina, M.Z., Yap, C.K., Ismail, A.R., Ismail, A. and Tan, S.G. in press. Anthropogenic impacts on the distribution and biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality of the Langat River, Peninsular Malaysia. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, A. 2003. Oil Palm, Soybeans and Critical Habitat Loss. A Review Prepared for the WWF Forest Conservation Initiative.WWF Forest Conservation Initiative, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A. 2002. Landscape Ecology in Action. Kluwer Academic Publisher, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology,10, 133-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist, H.J. and Lambin, E.F. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience,52, 143-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, K.C. 1982. Environmental impact of economic development in Peninsular Malaysia: a review. Applied Geography,2, 3-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulink, H. and Wagendorp, T. 2002. References for fragmentation analysis of the rural matrix in cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning,58, 137-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, C.W.S. 1988. The Oil Palm. 3rd Edition. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, H.S., DeZonia, B.E. and Mladenoff, D.J. 2000. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology,15, 591-601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, F. and Lausch, A. 2001. Supplementing land-use statistics with landscape metrics: some methodological consideration. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 72, 37-50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. 1997. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 1-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. 1993. Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australia wheatbelt. Biological Conservation,64, 193-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, J.A.G. 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology,15, 115-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasmi, A. 1997. Wildlife Conservation Issues in the Langat Basin. Master Thesis (unpublished). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. 1986. The Forest Resources of Malaysia: Their Economics and Development. Oxford University Press Pte, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., Geist, H.J., Agbola, S.B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J.W., Coomes, O.T., Dirzo,R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P.S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E.F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P.S., Richards, J.F., SkÃ¥nes, H., Steffen, W., Stone, G.D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T.A., Vogel, C. and Xu, J., 2001. The causes of land-use and land cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change,11, 261-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E.F., Geist, H.J. and Lepers, E. 2003. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,28, 205-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitao, A.B. and Ahern, J. 2002. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning,59, 65-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, R.J.M. and Stary, R. 1995. Landscape diversity and land use planning: a case study in Bavaria. Landscape and Urban Planning,31, 387-398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. and Yeh, A.G.-O. 2004. Analyzing spatial restructuring of land use patterns in a fast growing region using remote sensing and GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 335-354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norhayati, A., Abdullah, S.A., Shahrolnizah, A., Md-Zain, B.M., Shukor, M.N., Hazimin, H. and Nordin, M. 2004. Diversity and density of mammals in the peat swamp forests of the Langat Basin, Selangor, Malaysia. Journal of Malaysian Applied Biology, 33, 7-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okuda, T., Yoshida, K., Numata, S., Nishimura, S., Suzuki, M., Hashim, M., Miyasaku, N., Sugimoto, T., Tagashira, N. and Chiba, M. 2004. An ecosystem-management approach for CDM afforestation and reforestation activities: the need for an integration ecosystem assessment based on the valuation of ecosystem services for forested land. In Kyoto Mechanism and the Conservation of Tropical Forest Ecosystem. Okuda, T. and Matsumoto, Y. (Eds.), pp. 67-78. Proceedings of the International Symposium/Workshop on the Kyoto Mechanism and the Conservation of Tropical Forest Ecosystems, 29-30 January 2004, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J.F., Lankhorst, J.R.K. 1998. Evaluating visible spatial diversity in the landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning43: 65-78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K.H., O’Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Wickham, J.D., Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B. and Jackson, B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology,10, 23-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serneels, S. and Lambin, E.F. 2001. Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 85, 65-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. and Gardner, R.H. 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., O’Neill, R.V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice. Springer- Verlag, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom, J. and Wamelink, W. 2005. Spatial modelling in landscape ecology. In Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Weins, J and Moss, M. (Eds.), pp. 79-89. Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, M.A. and Nordin, M. 2003. River water quality assessment and ecosystem health: Langat River Basin, Selangor, Malaysia. In Managing for Healthy Ecosystems. Rapport, D.J., Lasley, W.L., Rolston, D.E., Nielson, N.O., Qualset, C.O., Damania, A.D. (Eds.), pp. 1395-1413. Lewis Publisher/CRC Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubaid, A. 1993. A comparison of the bat fauna between a primary and fragmented secondary forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Mammalia,57, 201-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

ABDULLAH, S., NAKAGOSHI, N. (2008). Landscape Ecological Approach In Oil Palm Land Use Planning And Management For Forest Conservation In Malaysia. In: Hong, SK., Nakagoshi, N., Fu, B., Morimoto, Y. (eds) Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5488-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics