Skip to main content

Regulating sex selection in a patriarchal society

Lessons from Taiwan

  • Chapter
The Family, Medical Decision-Making, and Biotechnology

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((ASBP,volume 91))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Björndahl, L., & Barratt, C. (2002). ‘Sex Selection: A Survey of Laboratory Methods and Clinical Results,’ Survey prepared for the Public Consultation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubeck, Diemut (2002). ‘Sex Selection: The Feminist Response,’ in J. Burley & J. Harris (Eds.), A Companion to Genetics(pp. 216–229), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, Executive Yuan of the ROC. (2003). ‘Analysis Report on Assisted Reproduction Technology from 1998 to 2001 in Taiwan’ [On-line, In Chinese]. Available: http://www.doh.gov.tw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (1990). ‘Fang’ and the Traditional Chinese Family System [In Chinese]. Lian-Ching Publishing Co, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2003). Gendered Lives under Neutral Laws: Women, the Family, and Feminist Legal Reform in Taiwan. S.J.D. dissertation, University of Michigan Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danis, J. (1995). ‘Sexism and ‘‘the Superfluous Female’’: Arguments for Regulating Pre-Implantation Sex Selection,’ Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 18: 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Yuan of the Republic of China. (2000). ROC Yearbook 2000 [On-line]. Available: http:www.roc-taiwan.org/taiwan/5-gp/yearbook /chpt02-1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Yuan of the Republic of China. (2002). Social Statistics Index[On-line]. Available: http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbas03/bs2/92chy/table/a203.xls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, K. (2002). ‘Where Have All the Young Girls Gone? Preconception Gender Selection in India and the United States,’ Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, 6, 253–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, H. (2001). ‘Taiwan Women’s Mission to Bear Sons,’Newsletter of Applied Ethics, 17, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, H.B. (1995). ‘Choosing Children’s Sex: Challenge to Feminist Ethics,’ in J.C. Callahan (Ed.), Reproduction, Ethics, and the Law: Feminist Perspectives(pp. 148–177), Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O.D. (1992). ‘Sex Selection: Regulating Technology Enabling the Predetermination of a Child’s Gender,’ Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 6, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. (2000). ‘Breaking Free from Patriarchy: A Comparative Study of Sex Selection Abortions in Korea and the United States,’ UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 17, 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, A. (1998). ‘Being Female Can Be Fatal: An Examination of India’s Ban on Prenatal Gender Testing,’ Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 6, 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., et al. (1994). ‘Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support in Taiwan,’ American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1010–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. (1996). ‘Section on Health and Reproduction,’ in Y. Liu (Ed.), 1995 Whitepaper on Women’s Rights [In Chinese] (pp. 219–254), Shih Pao Wen Hua Publishing, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius, ‘Li Lo,’ in P.Y. Hsieh, et.al. (Eds.), Readings from the Four Classics [In Chinese] (pp.4458–4512), San-Ming, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming Shen Daily, April 22, 2004, Sec. A2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Interior, Executive Yuan of the Republic of China. (2003). Annual Statistics Report[On-line]. Available: www.moi.gov.tw/w3/stat/home.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, C. (1987). Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis, Allen & Unwin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (1986). ‘Embryos, Families, and Procreative Liberty: The Legal Structure of the New Reproduction,’ Southern California Law Review, 59, 939–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (1994). Child of Choice, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. & Wells, D. (1985). Making Babies: The New Science and Ethics of Conception, Scribners, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A., et al. (1972). ‘Distinguishing Between X, Y, and YY-bearing Human Spermatozoa by Fluorescence and DNA Content,’ New Nature Biology, 229: 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, Y., & Tai, T. (1987). Chinese Law of Inheritance [In Chinese], San-Ming, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Daily News, May 6, 2002, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Daily News, January 8, 2003, Sec. A11.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Daily News, January 9, 2003, Sec. A15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., et al. (2004). ‘Comparison of Attitudes toward Genetic Testing among Health Care Professionals and Nonprofessionals’ [In Chinese], paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of Bioethics, organized by the Graduate Institute of Philosophy, Chung-Li, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (1985). Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection, Rowman & Allanheld, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (1992). ‘The Ethics of Sex Preselection,’ in K. Alpern (Ed.), The Ethics of Reproductive Technology(pp. 137–142), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.A. (1999). ‘Sex Selection: Individual Choice or Cultural Coercion?’ in H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.) Bioethics: An Anthology (pp. 137–143), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, D. & Fletcher, J. (1992). ‘Sex Selection through Prenatal Diagnosis: A Feminist Critique,’ in H. Holmes & L. Prudy (Eds.), Feminist Perspective in Medical Ethics(pp. 240–253), Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (2000). ‘Autonomy in Reproduction,’ in Awaking Foundation (Ed.), 1999 Women’s Rights Report [In Chinese], (pp. 93–103). Taipei: Awakening Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (2002a). ‘Why Hasn’t Sperm-Sorting Technology Become Controversial in Taiwan?’ [In Chinese], paper presented at the Workshop of Gender and Health, December 7, 2002, National Yang Ming University, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (2002b). ‘Pu Tong Te Hsing Pieh, Pu Tong Te Cheng I?’ [‘Different Sex Selections; Different Issues?’], Newsletter of Practical Ethics, 17 [In Chinese], 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rei, W. (2007). Regulating sex selection in a patriarchal society. In: The Family, Medical Decision-Making, and Biotechnology. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 91. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5220-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics