Abstract
Reliance on vadose zone models to estimate groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions of the United States is increasing due to limited groundwater supplies and continued urbanization. The success of vadose zone models in providing reliable estimates of urban recharge and other fluxes depends on the information content used to constrain the calibration process. In this study, a numerical experiment of artificial recharge through a three-layered vadose zone system revealed several findings related to coupled model calibration. First, the extension of vadose zone model calibration to three dependent variables added information content that enhanced parameter sensitivities. Second, predictive analysis using the calibration-constrained Monte Carlo approach was time-prohibitive because of the tendency toward local minima when using the gradient algorithm. Third, despite a perfect match to historical data, the affect of alternative starting calibration parameters sets on condition number illustrated the limitations of information quality on model uncertainty. Fourth, perfect observed / simulated profiles correlation coefficients for all calibration parameter sets, were, by themselves, poor indicators of model success. Fifth, the range of predictive recharge uncertainty, and uncertainty in energy and solute mass entering the groundwater system, estimated using the likelihood-type approach, is attributed to parameter non-uniqueness due to limited calibration information. For a calibration of a field system, the estimated range of predictive uncertainty would be larger because of additional uncertainty from errors in measurements and/or the conceptual model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Abbaspour, K. C., van Genuchten, M. Th., Schulin, R., and Schlppi, E., 1997, A sequential uncertainty domain inverse procedure for estimating subsurface flow and transport parameters. Water Resour. Res. 33(8):1879–1892.
American Petroleum Institute, 1997, Estimation of infiltration and recharge for environmental site assessment, Amer. Petrol.Inst. Soil and Groundwater Bull., (2), 4 pp.
Anderson, M. G., and Bates, P. D., 2001, Model Validation - Perspectives in Hydrological Science. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Anderson, M. P., and Woessner, W. W., 1992, The role of the post audit in model validation, Adv. Water Resources, 15:167–173.
Bailey, M. A., 2001, Analysis of infiltration along an ephemeral stream: limitations to the application of the heat tracer method: 14th Annual Symposium, Arizona Hydrological Society, Water Issues and Partnerships for Rural Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, September 12–15, 2001.
Burkham, D. E., 1970, Depletion of streamflow by infiltration in the main channels of the Tucson Basin, southeastern Arizona. U.S. Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Paper 1939-B.
Carrera J., and Neuman, S. P., 1986, Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 2. Uniqueness, Stability, and Solution Algorithm, Water Resour. Res., 38(28):1–14.
Constantz, J., and Thomas, C. L., 1996, The use of streambed temperature profiles to estimate the depth, duration, and rate of percolation beneath arroys. Water Resour. Res., 32(12):3597–3602.
Doherty, J., 2000, PEST2000: Upgrade notes. Watermark Numerical Computing, S.S. Papadopoulous Assoc., Bethesda, Md., 34 pp.
Doherty, J., 2001, PEST-ASP upgrade notes, Watermark Numerical Computing, 21 pp.
Fogg, G. E., LaBolle, E. M., and Weissmann, G. S., 1995, Groundwater vulnerability assessment: Hydrogeologic perspective and example from Salinas Valley, California, in: Application of GIS, Remote Sensing, Geostatistical and Solute Transport Modeling, D. L. Corwin, K. Loague and T. R. Ellsworth, eds., AGU Geophysical Monograph 108, pp. 45– 61.
Friedel, M. J., 2000, Documentation and verification of VST2D: a model for simulating transient, variably saturated, coupled water-heat-solute transport in heterogeneous, anisotropic, 2-dimensional, ground-water systems with variable fluid density. U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 00-4105, 124 pp.
Friedel, M. J., 2002, Quantifying ground-water recharge using a coupled water-heat-solute transport model: optimal nonlinear parameter estimation and predictive uncertainty: EOS Trans. AGU, 83(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract H21D-8060.
Friedel, M. J., 2005, Coupled inverse modeling of vadose zone water, heat, and solute transport: parameter nonuniqueness and predictive uncertainty, J. Hydrol., 312(1–4): 148–175.
Gailey, R. M., Gorelick, S. M., and Crowe., A. S., 1991, Coupled process parameter estimation and prediction uncertainty using hydraulic head and concentration data, Adv. in Water Resour., 14(5):301–314.
Hendrickx, J. M. H., Kan, A. S., Bannick, M. H., Birch, D., and Kidd, C., 1991, Numerical analysis of groundwater recharge through stony soils using limited data. J. Hydrol. 127:173–192.
Hill, M., 1998, Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration. U.S. Geol. Sur. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 98-4005, 90 pp.
Hughson, D. L., Yeh, T.-C. J., 1998, A geostatistically based inverse model for threedimensional variably saturated flow. Stochastic Hydrol. and Hydraul. 12: 285–298.
Izbicki, J., Radyk, J., and Michel, R. L., 2000, Water movement through a thick unsaturated zone underlying an intermittent stream in the western Mojave Desert, southern California, USA. J. Hydrol 238:194–217.
Leake, S. A., 1999, Southwest Ground-Water Resources Project, in Bartolino, J.R., ed., U.S. Geological Survey Middle Rio Grande Basin Study–Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop, Albuquerque, New Mexico, February 24-25, 1999. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open- File Rep. 99-203, 92 pp.
Mediana, A., and Carrera, J., 1996, Coupled estimation of flow and solute transport parameters, Water Resour. Res. 32(10):3063–3076.
Mehl, S., and Hill, M., 2001, A comparison of solute-transport solution techniques and their effect on sensitivity analysis and inverse modeling results. Ground Water 39(2):300–307.
Munevar, A. and Marino, M. A., 1999, Modeling analysis of groundwater recharge potential on alluvial fans using limited data. Ground Water 37(5):649–659.
Pang, L., and Close, M. E., 1999, Field-scale physical non-equilibrium transport in an alluvial gravel aquifer, J. Contam. Hydrol. 38:447–464.
Pang, L., Close, M. E., Watt, J. P. C., and Vincent, K. W., 2000, Simulation of picloram, atrazine, and simazine leaching through two New Zealand soils and into groundwater using HYDRUS-2D, J. Contam. Hydrol., 44:19–46.
Silliman, S. E., Ramierz, J., and McGabe, R. L., 1995, Quantifying downflow through creek sediments using temperature time series: one-dimensional solution incorporating measured surface temperature. J. Hydrol. 167:99–119.
Simunek, J., van Genuchten, M. Th., Gribb, M. M., and Hopmans, J. W., 1998, Parameter estimation of unsaturated soil hydraulic properties from transient flow processes. Soil & Tillage Res. 47 (1–2):27–36.
Sun, N. and Yeh, W. G., 1990, Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling 2. Identifiability and experimental design. Water Res. Res. 26(10):2527–2540.
Vecchia, A. V., and Cooley. R. L., 1987, Simultaneous confidence intervals and prediction intervals for nonlinear regression models with application to a groundwater flow model. Water Resour. Res. 23(7): 1237–1250.
Woodbury, A. D., and Smith, L., 1988, Simultaneous inversion of hydrogeologic and thermal data 2. Incorporation of thermal data. Water Resour. Res. 24(3):356–372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Friedel, M.J. (2006). RELIABILITY IN ESTIMATING URBAN GROUNDWATER RECHARGE THROUGH THE VADOSE ZONE. In: Tellam, J.H., Rivett, M.O., Israfilov, R.G., Herringshaw, L.G. (eds) Urban Groundwater Management and Sustainability. NATO Science Series, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5175-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5175-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5173-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5175-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)