Abstract
The apparently purposeful nature of living systems is obtained through a sophisticated network of semiotic controls whereby biochemical, physiological and behavioral processes become tuned to the needs of the system. The operation of these semiotic controls takes place and is enabled across a diversity of levels. Such semiotic controls may be distinguished from ordinary deterministic control mechanisms through an inbuilt anticipatory capacity based on a distinct kind of causation that I call here “semiotic causation” to denote the bringing about of changes under the guidance of interpretation in a local .context. Anticipation through the skilled interpretation of indicators of temporal relations in the context of a particular survival project (or life strategy) guides organismic behavior towards local ends. This network of semiotic controls establishes an enormously complex semiotic scaffolding for living systems. Semiotic scaffolding safeguards the optimal performance of organisms through semiotic interaction with cue elements which are characteristically present in dynamic situations. At the cellular level, semiotic scaffolding assures the proper integration of the digital coding system (the genome) into the myriad of analogical coding systems operative across the membranes of cells and cell organelles
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine Books.
Bateson, Gregory and Mary Catherine Bateson (1987). Angels Fear. Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York, Macmillan.
Brooks, R. (1993). “A robot that Walks: Emergent Behaviors from a Carefully Evolved Network”. In A robot that Walks: Emergent Behaviors from a Carefully Evolved Network. R. Beer and et. al., Academic Press.
Bruni, Luis Emilio (2003). A Sign-Theoretic Approach to Biotechnology. Dissertation. Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen.
Buss, Leo (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Clark, Andy (1997). Being There. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, A Bradford Book.
Deely, John (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Deely, John (1994). “How does Semiosis Effect Renvoi?” The American Journal of Semiotics 11 (1/2): 11–61.
Deely, John (2001). Four Ages of Understanding. The First Postmodern Survey of Philosophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Toronto, Toronto University Press.
Hendriks-Jansen, Horst (1996). Catching Ourselves in the Act. Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, and Human Thought. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1997). The Global Semiosphere. Semiotics Around the World. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Berkeley 1994, Berlin /New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1998). “Surfaces Inside Surfaces. On the Origin of Agency and Life”. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 5(1): 33–42.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1999). “Order out of Indeterminacy”. Semiotica 127 (Biosemiotica II, Special issue on Biosemiotics): 321–343.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2000). “The Biology of Signification”. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43(2): 252–268.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2005). Biosemiotik. En afhandling om livets tegn og tegnenes liv. København, Ries Forlag.
Kauffman, Stuart A. (1993). Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kauffman, Stuart A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press.
Lotman, Yuri M. (1990). Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London, I. B. Taurus and Co.
Pattee, Howard H. (1977). “Dynamic and Linguistic Modes of Complex Systems”. International Journal for General Systems 3: 259–266.
Pattee, Howard H. (1997). “The Physics of Symbols and The Evolution of Semiotic Controls”. In The Physics of Symbols and The Evolution of Semiotic Controls. Redwood City, CA, Addison-Wesley.
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1931–1935). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. I–VI. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1958). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. VII–VIII. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Santaella-Braga, Lucia (1999). “A New Causality for the Understanding of the Living. Biosemiotics”. Semiotica 127 (1/4): 497–519.
Sebeok, Thomas A. (2001). “Biosemiotics. Its, Roots, Proliferation, and Prospects”. Semiotica 134 (1/4): 61–78.
Soler, Manuel and Juan José Soler (1999). “Innate Versus Learned Recognition of Conspecifics in Great Spotted Cuckoos Clamator glandarius”. Animal Cognition 2: 97–102.
Vernadsky, Vladimir I. (1926). Biosfera. Leningrad, Nauka (French version: Paris 1929).
Vernadsky, Vladimir I. (1945). “The Biosphere and the Noösphere”. American Scientist 33: 1–12.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Semiotic Scaffolding Of Living Systems. In: Barbieri, M. (eds) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4813-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4814-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)