Skip to main content

A Simple Modal Logic for Belief Revision

  • Chapter
Uncertainty, Rationality, and Agency

Abstract

We propose a modal logic based on three operators, representing intial beliefs, information and revised beliefs. Three simple axioms are used to provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the qualitative part of Bayes’ rule. Some theorems of this logic are derived concerning the interaction between current beliefs and future beliefs. Information flows and iterated revision are also discussed.

I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for helpful and constructive comments. A first draft of this paper was presented at the Sixth Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT6), Leipzig, July 2004.

I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for helpful and constructive comments. A first draft of this paper was presented at the Sixth Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT6), Leipzig, July 2004.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchourron, C., P. Gärdenfors and D. Makinson: 1985, ‘On the Logic of Theory Change; Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Battigalli, P.: 1996, ‘Strategic Independence and Perfect Bayesian Equilibria’, Journal of Economic Theory 70, 201–234.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Battigalli, P. and G. Bonanno: 1992, ‘The Logic of Belief Persistence’, Economics and Philosophy 13, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battigalli, P. and G. Bonanno: 1999, ‘Recent Results on Belief, Knowledge and the Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory’, Research in Economics 53, 149–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, P., M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema: 2001, Modal Logic, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board, O.: 2004, ‘Dynamic Interactive Epistemology’, Games and Economic Behavior 49, 49–80.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G.: 1993, ‘Rational Belief Equilibria’, Economic Notes 22, 430–463.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. M.: 1976, ‘Conditionalization and Expected Utility’, Philosophy of Science 43, 415–419.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, B.: 1984, Modal Logic; An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekel, E. and F. Gul: 1997, ‘Rationality and Knowledge in Game Theory’, in: D. M. Kreps, and K. F. Wallis (eds.), Advances in Economic Theory, Seventh World Congress, Cambridge University Press, 87–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ditmarsch, H. and W. van der Hoek: 2004, Dynamic epistemic logic, working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. and J. Halpern: 1999, ‘Belief Revision: A Critique’, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 8, 401–420.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole: 1991, ‘Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium and Sequential Equilibrium’, Journal of Economic Theory 53, 236–260.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, A.: 1989, ‘Reflective Modalities and Theory Change’, Synthese 81, 115–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, A.: 1991, ‘On the Modal Logic of Theory Change’, in A. Fuhrmann (ed.), The logic of theory change, Lecture notes in Artificial Intelligence No. 465, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 259–281.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goranko, V. and S. Passy: 1992, ‘Using the Universal Modality: Gains and Questions’, Journal of Logic and Computation 2, 5–30.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O.: 1994, ‘Taking Belief Bases Seriously’, in D. Prawitz and D. Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala, Kluwer, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1986, Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Hoek, W.: 1993, ‘Systems for Knowledge and Belief’, Journal of Logic and Computation, 3, 173–195.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van der Hoek, W. and M. Pauly: forthcoming ‘Game Theory’, in: J. van Benthem, P. Blackburn, and F. Wolter (eds.), Handbook of Modal Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C, and P. Urbach: 1989, Scientific Reasoning, Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R.: 1983, The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. and R, Wilson: 1982, ‘Sequential Equilibria’, Econometrica, 50, 863–894.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1963, A Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Propositional Calculi’, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik and Grundlagen der Mathematik 9, 67–96.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1988, ‘Iteration of conditionals and the Ramsey test’, Synthese 76, 49–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liau, C.-J.: 2003, ‘Belief, Information Acquisition, and Trust in Multi-Agent Systems — A Modal Logic Formulation, Artificial Intelligence 149, 31–60.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, P.: 1993, Betting on Theories, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott, H.: 1991, ‘Two Methods of Constructing Contractions and Revisions of Knowledge Systems’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 149–173.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, K.: 1999, ‘Two traditions in the Logic of Belief: Bringing them Together’, in: H. J, Ohlbach and U. Reyle (eds.), Logic, Language and Reasoning, Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teller, P.: 1973, ‘Conditionalization and Observation’, Synthese, 26, 218–258.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonanno, G. (2005). A Simple Modal Logic for Belief Revision. In: Uncertainty, Rationality, and Agency. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4631-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4631-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4630-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4631-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics