Abstract
It has become clear that natural and related technological hazards and disasters are not problems that can be solved in isolation. The occurrence of disasters is a symptom of broader and more basic social problems. Since 1994, a team of over 100 expert academics and practitioners — including members of the private sector — have assessed, evaluated, and summarized knowledge about natural and technological hazards in the United States from the perspectives of the physical, natural, social, behavioral, and engineering sciences. The major thesis of the findings was losses from hazards and inability to comprehensively reduce losses of all types are the consequences of narrowand shortsighted development patterns, cultural premises, and attitudes toward the natural environment, science, and technology. To address these broad and basic problems, the study included proposals for ways in which people and the institutions of the United States can take responsibility for disaster losses, reduce future hazard losses, and link hazard mitigation to sustainable development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, M.B.: 1994, ‘Understanding the disaster-development continuum’, Focus on Gender 2, 7–10.
Bates, F.L. (ed.): 1982, Recovery, Change, and Development: A Longitudinal Study of the 1976 Guatemalan Earthquake, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Bolin, R.C.: 1982, Long-Term Family Recovery from Disaster, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Burby, R.J.: 1998, Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land Use, Joseph Henry, Washington, DC.
Cutter, S.: 2001, American Hazardscapes: The Regionalization of Hazards and Disasters, Joseph Henry, Washington, DC.
Cutter, S.: 1995, ‘The forgotten casualties: Women, children, and environmental Change’, Global Environmental Change: Human Policy Dimensions 5, 181–194.
Enarson, E. and Morrow, B.H.: 1998, ‘Why gender? Why women? An introduction to women and disaster’ in Enarson, E. and Morrow, B.H. (eds.), The Gendered Terrain of Disasters, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 1–10.
Fothergill, A. and Peek, L.A.: 2004, ‘Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of the Sociological Literature’ Natural Hazards 32, 89–110.
Fothergill, A.: 2001, Women in Crisis: An Ethnographic Study of Gender and Class in a Natural Disaster, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Fothergill, A., Maestas, E. and Darlington, J.D.: 1999, ‘Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature’, Disasters 23, 156–173.
Heinz Center: 2002, Human Links to Coastal Disasters, The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, Washington, DC.
Kunreuther, H. and Roth, R., Sr.: 1998, Paying the Price: the Status and Role of Insurance against Natural Disasters, Joseph Henry, Washington, DC.
Mileti, D.S.: 1999, Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry, Washington, DC.
Mileti, D.S., Fitzpatrick, C. and Farhar, B.C.: 1992, ‘Fostering public preparations for natural hazards: Lessons from the Parkfield earthquake prediction’, Environment 34, 16–39.
National Research Council: 1999, Reducing Disaster Losses through Better Information, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Rayner, S. and Malone, E.L.: 1997, ‘Zen and the art of climate maintenance’, Nature 390, 332–334.
Pielke, R.A., Jr.: 1998, ‘Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy’, Global Environmental Change 8(2), 159–170.
Schroeder, R.A.: 1987, Gender Vulnerability and Drought: A Case Study of the Hausa Social Environment, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Slovic, P: 2000, The Perception of Risk, Earthscan Publications, Sterling, VA.
Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K. and Perry, R.W.: 2001, Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and response in the United States, Joseph Henry, Washington, DC.
Tweeddale, M.: 1996, ‘The nature and handling of risk’, Australian Journal of Emergency Management 11, 2–4.
White, G.F. and Haas, J.E.: 1975, Assessment of Research on Natural Hazards, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mileti, D.S., Gailus, J.L. (2005). Sustainable Development and Hazards Mitigation in the United States: Disasters by Design Revisited. In: Haque, C.E. (eds) Mitigation of Natural Hazards and Disasters: International Perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4514-X_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4514-X_8
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3112-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4514-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)