Skip to main content

Seduced and Abandoned: Some Lasting Conclusions about Planned Change from the Cambire School Study

  • Chapter
The Roots of Educational Change

Abstract

In all honesty I had not read Implementing Organizational Innovations, co-authored with Neal Gross and Marilyn Bernstein, from cover to cover since my review of the page proofs for its publication in 1971. With a touch of pride, my reaction after completely rereading it was that we had reached quite a few conclusions in the book that were important to the field of planned educational change. My reaction, to be sure, made the writing of this chapter much easier than otherwise would have been possible, especially since it also seemed clear to me that these conclusions remain relevant today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bardach, E. (1977) The implementation game. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W.G., Bennis, K. D., & Chin, R. (Eds.). (1961, 1969). The planning of change. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J., & Trice, H. (1978). Implementing change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan R., & Biklin, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, J., & Brown, D. (Eds). (1980). Policy implementation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1965). Adoption of educational innovations. Eugene, OR: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, W. W. (1973). Measuring the implementation of differentiated staffing. Eugene, OR: Center for the Advanced Study of Administration, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., & Astuto, T. (1994, March). Redirecting reform. Phi Delta Kappan. 3, 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. (1992). School-community relations and school effectiveness. In R. Crowson (Ed.), School-community relations under reform (pp.105–127). Berkeley: McCutchan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, D., & Repa, J. (1993, October). Measuring shared decision making. Educational Leadership. 51(2), 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, D. (1993, Fall). Developing a shared decision making plan, New York style. School Administrators Association of New York State. 24(2), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, D., & Domenech, D. (1994, Spring). Using surveys for planning and monitoring shared decision making initiatives. School Administrators Association of New York State, 25(4), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. (Ed.). (1995). A second Chicago school? Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel, F. and Kivlin, J. (1966). Attributes of innovations as factors in diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 235–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (S. Stiegelbauer, Collaborator). (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacquinta, J. (1973). The process of organizational change in schools. In F. Kerlinger (Ed.), Review of Research in Educational: Vol. 1 (pp. 178–208). Itasca, Il.: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacquinta, J. (1975a, Winter). Status, risk, and receptivity to innovations in complex organizations. Sociology of Education., 48(4), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacquinta, J. (1975b, Fall). Status risk-taking: A central issue in the initation and implementation of public school innovations. Journal of Research and Development in Education,, 9(1), 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacquinta, J. (1978). Educational innovation in schools: Some distressing conclusions about implementation. An unpublished paper presented at the American Educational Research Association in Toronto, March 27–31, 19 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacquinta, J., Bauer, J., & Levin, J. (1993). Beyond technology’s promise. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg, E., & Reilley, E. (1957). Effecting change in large organizations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, A. and Margonis, F. (1995) The political aspect of Reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education. 103 (August), 377–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. & Associates. (1970). Behind the green door. Worthington, OH: Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N., Giacquinta, J., & Bernstein, M. (1971). Implementing organizational innovations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N., Mason, W., & McEachern, A. (1958). Explorations in role analysis. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C. (1993). Exploring social change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. (1969). Planning for innovation. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, P. (1996) Faculty use of the internet for scholarly purposes. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University, in progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriott, R., & Gross, N. (Eds.). (1979). The dynamics of planned educational change. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. (1984). Innovation up close. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. H. (1992) Receptivity of home economics teachers in New York State to the home and career skills curriculum. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazlow, C. (1974). Faculty receptivity to organizational change. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University).

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M., Millroy, W., & Preissle, J. (Eds.). (1992). The handbook of qualitative research in education. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1984). Teachers, their world, and their work. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. (1992). Commentary: Pushing up from below: Changing schools and universities. Teachers College Record, 93(4), 717–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. A. (1993). The receptivity of mediators to professional practice innovations. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. (1990). Your can’t just plug it in: Integrating the computer into the curriculum. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K., & Miles, M. (1990). Improving the urban high school. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauksch, I., & Miller M. (1981). Implementing change in nursing. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. (1990). The rand change agent study revisited. Educational Researcher. 5, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. (Ed.). (1965). Innovation in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. (1993). Teacher agency and curriculum making in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, L. (1980). Receptivity of Puerto Rican school teachers to four proposed innovations. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (Ed.). (1990). Frontiers of social theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th edition). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1971). The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1990) The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Keith, P. (1971). Anatomy of educational innovation. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussmann, L. (1977). Tales out of school: Implementing organizational change in the elementary grades. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. (1984). The growth of sociological theories. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W., & Elmore, R. (1976). Social program implementation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. (1980). The implementation perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. (Ed.). (1982). Studying implementation. Chatham, NJ: Chatham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarcheski, A., & Mahon, N. E. (1985). The unification model in nursing: A study of receptivity among nurse educators in the United States. Nursing Research, 34, 120–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giacquinta, J.B. (2005). Seduced and Abandoned: Some Lasting Conclusions about Planned Change from the Cambire School Study. In: Lieberman, A. (eds) The Roots of Educational Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4451-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics