Skip to main content

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE A Dispute on Truth, Power or Money?

  • Chapter
Bioethics in Cultural Contexts

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 28))

Abstract

During the last two decades of the twentieth century, a cultural transformation of modern medicine began to take place in the industrialised countries of the western world. On one hand scientific and technological development accelerated, surpassing its previous limits. On the other, unconventional medicine1 reappeared after a long post-war period of silence, and its use has become more and more widespread during recent years (Eisenberg 1993 and 1998; Fisher 1994; Thomas 1991). Is it not strange that in an era of technological miracles and heroic medical performances people are again using either traditional or even exotic healing practices? Why do they do so if science advances in leaps and bounds, and applies its new techniques in practice? Is this a symptom of the fall of the rational world-view? What does it indicate? While Erich Fromm could still claim in 1973 that science is considered the highest value in industrial societies, that it is associated with moral correctness (Fromm 1997), at the beginning of the new millennium opinion is much more heterogeneous. In accordance with the sociological description of a postmodern society, different or even contradictory value systems coexist side by side and claim the right to their own existence. On the streets we are confronted with bizarre combinations of traditional and technological elements in human behaviour and appearance. To be individual in one’s style has become a new sort of cultural demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauman, Z. The Liquid Modernity. London: Polity Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, D.L.; Grant, W.D.; Hendricks, S.R.; et al. “The physician and unconventional medicine.” Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 1995, 1, 3,31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, E. “Does a doctor have a duty to provide information and advice about complementary and alternative medicine?” J Law Med Ethics 2003, 10, 3, 271–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, R. “Pathology: A study of social movements within a profession.” Social Problems 1962, 10, 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, D.M.; Kessler, R.C.; Foster C.; et al. “Unconventional medicine in the United States.” The New England Journal of Medicine 1993, 328, 246–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, D.M.; Davis, R.B.; Ettner, S.L.; et al. “Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997.” Journal of American Medical Association 1998, 280,1569–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, E. “The role of complementary and alternative medicine.” Br Med J 2000, 321, 1133–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, E.; Cohen, M.H. and Stone, J. “Ethical problems arising in evidence based complementary and alternative medicine.” J Med Ethics 2003, 30, 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, E. and Cohen, M.H. “Informed consent in complementary and alternative medicine.” Arch Intern Med 2001, 161, 19, 2288–2292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. and Ward, A. “Complementary medicine in Europe.” Br Med J 1994, 309, 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality. Vol.1. New York: Vintage, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. “Training for uncertainty.” In The Student-Physician. Robert K. Merton, G. Reader and P. Kendall (eds.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1957, 207 – 241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. “The evolution of medical uncertainty.” Milbank Meml Fund Quarterly 1980, 58, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. and Stollberg, G. “Conceptualising hybridisation -on the diffusion of Asian medical knowledge to Germany.” International Sociology 2004a, 19, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. and Stollberg, G. “Medical acupuncture in Germany: patterns of consumerism among physicians and patients.” Sociology of Health and Illness 2004b, 26, 3, 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. Profession of Medicine. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. Anatomie lidské destruktivity [Anatomie der menschlichen Destruktivität].Praha: Lidové noviny, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W.J. “The Librarian: From Occupation to Profession?” In Professionalization. Howard M. Vollmer and Donald L. Mills (eds.). Englewood Cliffs, New Yersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürsoy, A. “Beyond the orthodox: Heresy in medicine and the social sciences from a cross-cultural perspective.” Soc Sci Med 1996, 43, 5, 577–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, P. “Medicine, post-modernism and the end of certainty.” Br Med J 1996, 313, 1568–1569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizova, E. “Nekonvencní medicína z pohledu praktickych lékaru [Unconventional medicine as viewed by general practitioners].” Prakt. Lék. 2002, 82, 7, 425–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. Struktura vedeckych revolucí.Praha: Oikoymenh, 1997 [original version: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962].

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibovici, L. “Alternative (complementary) medicine: a cuckoo in the nest of empiricist red warblers.” Br Med J 1999, 319, 1629–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, R.E. and Luft, H.S. “Perspectives in accountability: past, present, and future.” In Ehical Dimensions of Health Policy. Marion Danis, Carolyn Clancy and Larry R. Churchill (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, 272–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. “Dissent and heresy in medicine: models, methods, and strategies.” Soc Sci Med 2004, 58, 4, 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, C. and Sirur, D. “Art, science and placebo: incorporating homeopathy in general practice.” Sociology of Health and Illness 1998, 20, 2, 168–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco, G.P. and Smith, G. “Informed consent in complementary and alternative medicine: current status and future needs.” Semin Oncol 2002, 29, 6, 601–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neale, R.J. “Lords call for regulation of complementary medicine.” Br Med J 2000, 321, 1365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. “Social Structure and Dynamic Process: The Case of Modern Medical Practice.” In The Social System. Talcott Parsons (ed.). The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, M.R.; Pearcy, R.M. and Fraser, J.S. “A comparison of the attitudes shown by general practitioners, hospital doctors and medical students towards alternative medicine.” J. Royal Society Med 1994, 87, 523–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. The Greatest Benefits to Mankind. London: Sage, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sade, R.M. “Complementary and alternative medicine. Foundations, ethics and law.” J Law Med Ethics 2003, 31, 2, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, L.J. “Alternative medicine or Alternatives to Medicine? A Physicians's Perspective.” Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics 2000, 9, 1, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneirov, M. and Geczik, J. D. “Alternative health and the challenges of institutionalization.” Health 2002, 6, 2, 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred. “On Multiple Realities.” In Collected papers, vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality . M. Natanson (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siahpush, M. “A critical review of the sociology of alternative medicine: research on users, practitioners and the orthodoxy.” Health 1999a, 4, 2, 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siahpush, M. “A sociological critique of alternative medicine: liberation or disempowerment?” Social Alternatives 1999b, 18, 4, 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambolovic, V. “Medical heresy - the view of a heretic.” Soc Sci Med 1996, 43, 5, 601–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stollberg, G. “Heterodoxe Medizin, Weltgesellschaft und Glokalisierung: Asiatische Medizinformen in Westeuropa.” In Kommunikation über Krankheiten.(Serie Bielefelder Schriften zur Linquistik und Literaturwissenschaft). Gisela Brünner and Elisabeth Gülich (eds.). Bielefeld, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stollberg, G. Medizinsoziologie. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sociological shifts in the medical profession, Czech Republic Grant Agency, project no. 403-02-0691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, J. “Informed consent, shared decision-making, and complementary and alternative medicine.” J Law Med Ethics 2003, 31, 2, 247–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K.J.; Carr, J.; Westlake, L. and Williams, B.T. “Use of non-orthodox and conventional health care in Great Britain.” Br Med J 1991, 302, 207–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S.; Best, A.; Balon, J.; Kelner, M. and Rickhi, B. “Ethical dimensions in the borderland between conventional and complementary/alternative medicine.” J Altern Complement Med 2002, 8, 6, 907–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckett, D. and Kaufert, J.M. (eds.). Basic Readings in Medical Sociology. London: Tavistock Publ., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, M. “Obligation to advise of options for treatment - medical doctors and complementary and alternative medicine practitioners.” J Law Med Ethics 2003, 10, 3, 296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, R. and Lewith G. “Complementary medicine and the general practitioner.” Br Med J 1986, 292, 1498–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, M.B. “The concept of disease in alternative medicine.” In What is Disease. James M. Humber and Robert F. Almeder (eds.). Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

KRIZOVA, E. (2006). ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE A Dispute on Truth, Power or Money?. In: Rehmann-Sutter, C., Düwell, M., Mieth, D. (eds) Bioethics in Cultural Contexts. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4241-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics