Skip to main content

Ramsey’s Ramsey-sentences

  • Chapter
Cambridge and Vienna

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2004] ((VCIY,volume 12))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • R. B. Braithwaite, “Professor Eddington’s Gifford Lectures”, in: Mind, 38, 1929, pp.409–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. B. Braithwaite, “Critical Notice: The Philosophy of Physical Science”, in: Mind, 49, 1940, pp.455–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf Carnap, “Replies and Systematic Expositions”, in: P. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle IL: Open Court, 1963, pp.859–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • William Demopoulos & Michael Friedman, “Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest”, in: Philosophy of Science, 52, 1985 pp.621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William Demopoulos, “On the Rational Reconstruction of Our Theoretical Knowledge”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 2003a, pp.371–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William Demopoulos, “Russell’s Structuralism and the Absolute Description of the World”, in: N Grifin (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur S. Eddington, “Group Structure in Physical Science”, in: Mind, 50, 1941, pp.268–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane English, “Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey”, in: Journal of Philosophy, 70, 1973, pp.453–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeff Ketland, “Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 2004, pp.287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae Langton, Kantian Humility. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Lewis, “Putnam’s Paradox”, in: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62, 1984, pp.221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover Maxwell, “Theories, Perception and Structural Realism”, in: R. Colodny (Ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970a, pp.3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, Maxwell, “Structural Realism and the Meaning of Theoretical Terms”, in: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, IV, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970b, pp.181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. A. Newman, “Mr. Russell’s ‘Causal Theory of Perception’”, in: Mind, 37, 1928, pp.137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Alex Orenstein, W V Quine. Chesham: Acumen 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Papineau, “Theory-Dependent Terms”, in: Philosophy of Science, 63, 1996, pp.1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stathis Psillos, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London & New York: Routledge 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stathis Psillos, “Carnap, the Ramsey-Sentence and Realistic Empiricism”’, in: Erkenntnis, 52, 2000 pp.253–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stathis Psillos, “An Introduction to Carnap’s ‘Theoretical Concepts in Science’” (together with Carna “Theoretical Concepts in Science”), in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31 2000b, pp.151–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stathis Psillos, “Is Structural Realism Possible?”, in: Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 68, 2001 pp.S13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stathis Psillos, “Scientific Realism & Metaphysics”, in Ratio, 18, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays. (Edited by R. B. Braithwaite). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Ramsey, Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics. (Edited by M. C. Galavotti). Bibliopolis 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • William W. Rozeboom, “Studies in the Empiricist Theory of Scientific Meaning”, in: Philosophy Science, 27, 1960, pp.359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Matter. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark Sainsbury, Russell. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nils-Eric Sahlin, The Philosophy of F P Ramsey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz Schlick, General Theory of Knowledge. (2nd German Edition, A. E. Blumberg trans.). Wien & New York: Springer-Verlag 1918/1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz Schlick, “Form and Content: An Introduction to Philosophical Thinking”, 1932, in: Mori Schlick’s Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Dordrecht: D. Reidel P. C., 1979, pp.285–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham Solomon, “An Addendum to Demopoulos and Friedman (1985)”, in: Philosophy of Science 56, 1989, pp.497–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. A. K. van Benthem, “Ramsey Eliminability”, in: Studia Logica, 37, 1978, pp.321–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James van Cleve, Themes From Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Winnie, “The Implicit Definition of Theoretical Terms”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18, 1967, pp.223–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Winnie, “Theoretical Analyticity”, in: R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky (Eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol.8, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1970, pp.289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elie Zahar, Poincaré’s Philosophy: From Conventionalism to Phenomenology. La Salle IL: Open Court 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Psillos, S. (2006). Ramsey’s Ramsey-sentences . In: Galavotti, M.C. (eds) Cambridge and Vienna. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2004], vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4101-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics