Abstract
By looking back at the last half century and beyond, an understanding emerges in the patterns and influences of the social, fiscal and institutional development of astronomical institutions and observatories. In this paper, the authors review many changes that have transformed how astronomers build and use their “great telescopes”; they also examine the evolving process that maximizes the productivity and impact of undertaking modern ground-based optical/infrared astronomy. The integration of modern engineering and experimental practices, broadened access to largescale funding and international competition, all have a role in these changes. A changing social paradigm has moved these ventures from the scientific elite into the realm and structure of tightly managed projects involving close partnerships between engineers and scientists. Astronomer’s observational methods have changed in fundamental ways as well, driven by the complexity of the instruments used and their tremendous cost. The conclusion of this paper is that optical/infrared ground-based astronomy is in transition. “Hundred-million-dollar-scale” 8m to 10m telescopes have been erected and now our communities have billion-dollar-scale ambitions. To realize these ambitions, the same communities need to relinquish cherished notions of individual and even institutional dominance and merge into large, productive consortia consisting of institutions and multi-national agencies.
Matt Mountain is now at the Space Telescope Science Institute, Homewood Campus, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore MD 21218, USA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, R.G., Glazebrook, K., McCarthy, P.J., Crampton, D., Murowinski, R., Jøgensen, I., Roth, K., Hook, I.M., Savaglio, S., Chen H.W., Marzke, R.O. & Carlberg, R. 2004, The Gemini Deep Deep Survey: I. Introduction to the Survey, Catalogues, and Composite Spectra, Astron. J. 127, 2455–2483.
Businger, S., Cherubini, T., Dors, I., McHugh, J., McLaren, R.A., Moore, J.B., Ryan, J.M., Nardell, C.A. 2003, Supporting the Mission of the Mauna Kea Observatories with Ground Winds Incoherent UV Lidar Measurements, in Adaptive Optical System Technologies II, Proc. SPIE 4839, 858–868.
Collins, H.M. 2003, LIGO Becomes Big Science, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 33/2, 261–297.
Devorkin, D.H. 2000, Who Speaks for Astronomy? How Astronomers Responded to Government Funding after World War II, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31/1, 55–92.
Faber, S. 1984, Large Optical Telescopes — New Visions into Space and Time, in Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, 11th Meeting, Annals New York Acad. Sc. 422, 171–179.
Florence, R. 1995, The Perfect Machine — Building The Palomar Telescope Harper Collins (ISBN 0-060-92670-8).
Galison, P. 1997, Image and Logic:: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Univ. Chicago Press (ISBN 0-226-27916-2).
Glaspey, J. 1996, Improving Observing Efficiency — New Observing Modes for the Next Century, Astron. Soc. Pacific Conf. Series 87, 72.
Glazebrook, K. & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2001, Microslit Nod-Shuffle Spectroscopy: A Technique for Achieving Very High Density of Spectra, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 113, 197–214.
Glazebrook, K., Abraham, R.G., McCarthy, P.J., Savaglio, S., Chen, H.W., Crampton, D., Murowinski, R., Jøgensen, I., Roth, K., Hook, I.M., Marzke, R.O. & Carlberg, R. 2004, A High Abundance of Massive Galaxies 3–6 Billion Years after the Big Bang, Nature 430, 181–184.
Juneau, S., Glazebrook, K., Crampton, D., McCarthy, P.J., Savaglio, S., Abraham, P., Carlberg, R. G., Chen, H.W., Le Borgne, D., Marzke, R. O., Roth, K., Jøgensen, I., Hook, I. & Murowinski, R. 2005, Cosmic Star Formation History and its Dependence on Galaxy Stellar Mass, Astrophys. J. 619, L135–L138.
Kloeppel, J. E. 1983, Realm of the Long Eyes — A Brief History of Kitt Peak National Observatory, Univelt, San Diego (ISBN 0-912183-01-2).
Learner, R. 1986, Legacy of the 200-inch, Sky & Tel. 71, 349–353.
McCarthy, P.J., Le Borgne, D., Crampton, D., Chen, H.W., Abraham, R., Glazebrook, K., Savaglio, S., Carlberg, R.G., Marzke, R.O., Roth, K., Jøgensen, I., Hook, I., Murowinski, R. & Juneau, S. 2004, Evolved Galaxies at z > 1.5 from the Gemini Deep Deep Survey: The Formation of Massive Stellar Systems, Astrophys. J. 614, L9–L12.
McCray, P. 2003, The Contentious Role of a National Observatory, Physics Today 56/10, 55–61.
McCray, P. 2004, Giant Telescopes: Astronomical Ambition and the Promise of Technology, Harvard Univ. Press (ISBN 0-674-01147-3).
Mountain, M. 2004, The Future of ELTs (Extremely Large Telescopes): A Very Personal View, 2nd Backaskog Workshop (in press).
NRC 2003, Connecting Quarks with the Cosmos: Eleven Science Questions for the New Century, National Research Council of the National Academies, Natl Acad. Press (ISBN 0-309-07406-1).
Riordan, M. 2001, A Tale of Two Cultures: Building the Superconducting Super Collider 1988–1993, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 32/1, 124–144.
Savaglio, S., Glazebrook, K., Abraham, R.G., Crampton, D., Chen, H.W., Mc-Carthy, P.J., Jøgensen, I., Roth, K., Hook, I. M., Marzke, R.O., Murowinski, R. & Carlberg, R. 2004, The Gemini Deep Deep Survey: II. Metals in Star-Forming Galaxies at Redshift 1.3 < z < 2, Astrophys. J. 602, 51–65.
Schmitt, W.R. 1994, Public Support of Science, Physics Today 47/1, 29–33.
Simons, D., Abraham, R., Blum, R., Meyer, M., Tinney, C. & Wyse, R. 2004, Scientific Horizons at the Gemini Observatory: Exploring a Universe of Matter, Energy and Life, Gemini Obs.
Strom, S. 2003, private communication.
Westphall, C. 2001, Collaborating Together: The Stories of TPC, UA1, CDF and CLAS, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 32/1, 163–178.
Westphall, C. 2002, A Tale of Two More Laboratories: Readying for Research at Fermilab and Jefferson Laboratory, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 32/2, 369–407.
Wilson, R.N. 2003, The History and Development of the ESO Active Optics System, ESO Messenger 113, 1–9.
Whitford, A.E. 1977, quotation from an oral history interview, 15 Jul 1977, p. 51, interviewed by D.H. DeVorkin, Center of History of Physics/American Institute of Physics Collection.
Ziman, J. 1995, Some Reflections on Physics as a Social Institution, Twentieth Century Physics III, Inst. Physics Publ. and Amer. Inst. Physics Press, p. 2041.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roy, JR., Mountain, M. (2006). The Evolving Sociology of Ground-Based Optical and Infrared Astronomy at the Start of the 21ST Century. In: Heck, A. (eds) Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy Volume 6. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 335. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4056-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4056-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4055-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4056-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)