Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 90))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Herbert Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement, A Historical Introduction, 2 Vols. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1965), Vol. II, p. 399.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edmund Husserl, The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, Martin Heidegger (ed.), James S. Churchill (trans.) (Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press, 1964), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mario Sancipriano, “R. Ingarden et le ‘vrai’ Bergsonisme”, Analecta Husserliana, Vol. IV (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1976), p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilles Deleuze has noted Husserl and Bergson’s indebtedness to Riemann in Bergsonism, Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam (trans.) (New York: Zone Books, 1991), p. 117; pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhard Riemann, Gesammelte mathematische Werke und wissenschaftlicher Nachlass (Leipzig: Teubner, 1876), p. 254; W. K. Clifford (trans.), Nature 8, number 183: 14; quoted from Robin Dune, “Splitting Time, Bergson’s Philosophical Legacy”, Philosophy Today, Summer 2000, p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Concerning the province of objects within a manifold, Husserl writes, in Formal and Transcendental Logic, Dorion Cairns (trans.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969), p. 91, that it “is a province... that is determined solely by the circumstance that... among the Objects belonging to the province, certain connections are possible, which come under certain fundamental laws having such and such a determinate form (here the only determining condition). In respect of their matter, the Objects remain completely indeterminate.... Thus they are determined... exclusively by the form of the connections ascribed to them. These connections themselves are accordingly as little determined in respect of content as the Objects connected”.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henri Bergson, Time and Free Will, An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, F. L. Pogson (trans.) (Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, 2001), p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edmund Husserl, Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907, Collected Works, Vol. VII, Richard Rojcewicz (ed. and trans.) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 59. Concerning the perception of a surface covered with sensible data — the’ spatial extension of an appearance’ — Husserl says that this is a “qualitative continuity.... That essentially implies fragmentability and the ideal possibility of an abstraction into phases”.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Idem.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Edmund Husserl, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction To Phenomenology, Dorion Cairns (trans.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Idem.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henri Bergson, Matter and Memory, N. M. Paul and W. S. Palmer (trans.) (New York: Zone Books, 1991), p. 81. Cf. Time and Free Will, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matter andMemory, p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thing and Space, p. 55, emphasis mine.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Idem.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Edmund Husserl, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, W. R. Boyce Gibson (trans.) (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd; New York: Humanities Press Inc, 1931), p. 132. Husserl adds: “The perspected variable, however, is in principle possible only as spatial (it is indeed spatial in its essence), but not possible as experience.” This, of course, excludes the body, for the body is given in perspectives no less than any other object of outer perception.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., p. 134. And Husserl adds: “Where there is no Being in space, it is senseless to speak of seeing from different standpoints with a changing orientation, and under the different aspects thereby opened up, or through varying appearances and perspective shadings.”

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cartesian Meditations, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Edmund Husserl, De la synthèse passive: Logique transcendantale et constitutions originaires, Bruce Bégout and Jean Kessler (trans.) (Jérôme Millon, 1998), p. 95; all translations into English are mine.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ideas I, p. 397. Or as Husserl says in Cartesian Meditations, p. 49: “in the flux of intentional synthesis... an essentially necessary conformity to type prevails”.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ideas I, p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cartesian Meditations, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cf. Ideas I, §§ 38, 46, 82, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  37. This genetic difference is also true of “all acts directed towards essences, or towards the intentional experiences of other Egos with other experience-streams” (Ideas I, p. 124).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Idem.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 2Ibid., p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., p. 139. Husserl adds that while experiences exclude spatial orientations, an experience has temporal orientations, notably past, present and future, in which case, then, our reflection on some experience does imply some ‘imperfection’, for the past and future phases of an experience are ‘not there’. But “this incompleteness... which belongs to the essence of our perception of experience is fundamentally other than that which is of the essence of ‘transcendent’ perception, perception through a presentation that varies perspectively through such a thing as appearance” (Ibid., p. 140).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  42. CartesianMeditations, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Henri Bergson, “Introduction (Part II)”, The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics, Mabelle L. Andison (trans.) (New York: Citadel Press, 1946), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ideas I, p. 143.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., p. 152; cf. Ibid., p. 153. Whether the world’s dependence on consciousness is to be understood epistemologically, strictly in terms of essential relations, or also ontologically, as involving existential relations, does not concem us here, where what is at stake is to establish a contrast with Bergson. For the view of ontological dependence, cf. Herman Philipse, “Transcendental Idealism”, in The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, Barry Smith and David W. Smith (eds.) (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 239–305. For the view of epistemological dependence, cf. Richard H. Holmes, “Is Transcendental Phenomenology Committed to Idealism?”, The Monist 59 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cf. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  48. On these points I refer the reader to John Brough’s essay, “The Emergence of an Absolute Consciousness in Husserl’s Early Writings on Time-Consciousness”, Man and World 5(3) (August 1972): 298–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., p. 132. These are contraries: what is indivisible, it is conunonly assumed, cannot change, cannot be subject to modification; if, e.g., one were to change Socrates’ individuality by inserting another soul into him, then it would no longer be this Socrates. Conversely, that which is changeable, it is generally held, is divisible. It is Bergson and Husserl’s virtue to have combined contrary properties, indivisibility and changeability, into one concept of time.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Time and Free Will, pp. 113, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cf. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid., p. 50. Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative, 3 Vols., Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (trans.) (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988), Vol. III, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  54. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cf., Ibid., p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid., p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Matter and Memory, p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  62. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Idem.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Matter and Memory, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  65. De la synthèse passive, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibid., p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cf. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, pp. 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  68. There is, of course, nothing surprising in this if, to begin with, the “question of the ‘origin of time’ ” is addressed from “the point of view of theory of knowledge” (Ibid., p. 27).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ibid., p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid., p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid., pp. 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Noted by André Robinet in Bergson et les métamorphoses de la durée (Paris: Éditions Seghers, 1965), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Cf. Matter and Memory, pp. 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibid., p. 17. By calling objects, or the elements of matter, ‘images’, Bergson has in mind the ‘object’ of common sense, notably, something placed halfway between what the realist calls a ‘thing’ and what the idealist calls a ‘representation’: it is an image since the object is as we perceive, with all the appurtenant sensible qualities, but it is a self-existing image, for perception does not bring the object into being (Ibid., pp. 9–10).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid, pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ibid., p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid., p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Perception arises “from a sort of question addressed to motor activity” (Ibid., p. 46). Perception is sensory-motor owing to the double faculty of the body: sensing affections within, and performing automatic or voluntary actions (Ibid., p. 61).

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, Colin Smith (trans.) (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1962), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Matter and Memory, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ibid., p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ibid., p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibid., p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ibid., p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ibid., pp. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ibid., pp. 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ibid., p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  88. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Matter and Memory, p. 82. Insofar as this is true of every member of the body, the latter is a collection of inductive motor mechanisms: “we may speak of the body as an ever advancing boundary between the future and the past, as a pointed end, which our past is continually driving forward into our future” (Ibid., p. 78).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Ibid., p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Henri Bergson, “Memory of the Present and False Recognition”, in Time & The Instant: Essays in the Physics and Philosophy of Time, Robin Durie (ed.) (Manchester: Clinamen Press, 2000), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Matter and Memory, p. 102. “Memory... creates anew the present perception” (ibid., p. 101).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ibid., p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  94. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Matter and Memory, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winkler, R. (2006). Husserl and Bergson on Time and Consciousness. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Logos of Phenomenology and Phenomenology of the Logos. Book Three. Analecta Husserliana, vol 90. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3718-X_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics