Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Information Science and Knowledge Management ((ISKM,volume 8))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, M., & Malone, T. (1990). Answer garden: A tool for growing organizational memory. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Office Information Systems 1990, 31–39. Cambridge, MA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1999). Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing and Management, 35, 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, C., & Pratt, W. (2002). Collaborative information synthesis. In E. G. Toms (Ed.), ASIST 2002: Proceedings of the 65th American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 44–56. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, H., Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Dumais, S., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. (2003). A comparison of the collaborative information retrieval (cir) behaviors of two design teams. The New Review of Information Behavior Research, 4, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, H., Jones, W., & Dumais, S. (2004). Information behavior that keeps found things found. Information Research, 10(1), 1–22. Available: http://www.informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper207.html. Retrieved 20 October 2004.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. Amsterdam: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.) (1993). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A., Twidale, M. B., O’Brien, J., & Nichols, D. M. (1997). Talking in the library: Implications for the design of digital libraries. In R. B. Allen & E. Rasmussen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, 221–228. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (2004). Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(6), 557–560.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E. (2001). Knowledge management issues for online organisations: “communities of practice” as an exploratory framework. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36:171–219. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E., & Cronin, B. (1998). Texts at work: Some thoughts on “just for you” service in the context of domain expertise. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 107–114. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, K., & Cash, D. (1994). Turning information into knowledge: Information finding as a collaborative activity. In J. L. Schnase, J. Leggett, R. K. Furuta, & E. Metcalfce (Eds.), Proceedings of Digital Libraries’ 94, 119–125. Available: http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/DL94/paper/lotus.html. Retrieved 29 November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. (1993). Modelling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A grounded theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdelez, S., & Rioux, K. (2000). Sharing information encountered for others on the web. The New Review of Information Behavior Research, 1, 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidel, R., Bruce, H., Pejtersen, A. M., Dumais, S., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. (2000). Collaborative information retrieval (CIR). The New Review of Information Behavior Research, 1, 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Cleal, B., & Bruce, H. (2004). A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 939–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 73–107. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, P., Ash, J., Lavelle, M., Lyman, J., Delcambre, L., Maier, D., Weaver, M., & Bowers, S. (2001). Bundles in the wild: Managing information to solve problems and maintain situation awareness. Library Trends, 49(2), 266–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haake, J. M., Wiil, U. K., & Nürnberg, P. J. (1999). Openness in shared hypermedia workspaces: The case for collaborative open hypermedia systems. SIGWEB Newsletter, 8(3), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2000). The information seeking and retrieval process at the swedish patent-and registration office. Moving from lab-based to real life work-task environment. In N. Kando & L. Mun-Kew (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGIR 2000 Workshop on Patent Retrieval, 43–53. Athens, Greece: ACM SIGIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2004). Collaborative information searching in an information-intensive work domain: Preliminary results. Journal of Digital Information Management, 2(1), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2005). Collaborative information retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Information Processing and Management, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2002). Communities of practice with and without information technology. In E. G. Toms (Ed.), ASIST 2002: Proceedings of the 65th American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 338–349. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. (1998). Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organizational Action. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R., & Sellen, A. (1995). Collaborative tools and the practicalities of professional work at the international monetary fund. In R. Katz, R. Mack,& L. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI’95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 122–129. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartel, J. (2003). The serious leisure frontier in library and information science: Hobby domains. Knowledge Organization, 30(3/4), 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., Knoblauch, H., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology and social interaction: The emergence of “workplace studies”. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzum, M. (2000). People as carriers of experience and sources of commitment: Information seeking in a software design project. The New Review of Information Behavior Research, 1, 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzum, M., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2000). The information-seeking practices of engineers: Searching for documents as well as for people. Information Processing and Management, 36(5), 761–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelin, K., & Ingwersen, P. (2005). Information seeking research needs extension towards tasks and technology. Information Research 10(1), 1–17. Available: http://InformationR.net/ir/paper212.html. Retrieved 20 October 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1994). Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center and Institute for Research on Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Bruce, B., Bowker, G., Burbules, B., Porac, J., & Wade, J. (2000). Modeling distributed knowledge processes in next generation multidisciplinary alliances. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3/4), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasti, H., Baker, K., & Bowker, G. C. (2003). ECSCW 2003 computer supported scientific collaboration (CSSC) workshop report. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 24(2), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlthau, C. (1993). Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. New York: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. (1995). Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, P. (2003). A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 59(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, H. (1959). Planned and unplanned scientific communication. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A., & Miller, J. R. (1991). Twinkling lights and nested loops: Distributed problem solving and spreadsheet development. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1993). National Collaboratories: Applying Information Technology for Scientific Research. Committee Toward a National Collaboratory: Establishing the User-Developer Partnership. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, V., & Jeffries, R. (1993). Information artisans: Patterns of result sharing by information searchers. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, COOCS’93, 98–107. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. L. (1999). Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 242–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. L. (2001). Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. W., & Paisley, W. J. (1967). Scientific Information Exchange at an Interdisciplinary Behavioral Science Convention. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Communication Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, K. (1999). Waiting for chiropody: Contextual results from an ethnographic study of information behavior among attended at community clinics. Information Processing and Management, 35, 801–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poltrock, S., Grudin, J., Dumais, S., Fidel, R., Bruce, H., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2003). Information seeking and sharing in design teams. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 239–247. New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prekop, P. (2002). A qualitative study of collaborative information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 58(5), 533–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procter, R., Goldenberg, A., Davenport, E., & McKinlay, A. (1998). Genres in support of collaborative information retrieval in the virtual library. Interacting with Computers, 10, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M., Dourish, P., & Pratt, W. (2001). Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care. In W. Printz, M. Jarke, Y. Rogers, K. Schmitdt, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW 2001, 239–258. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, N. C., Roussinov, D., Nunamaker, J. F., & Chen, H. (1999). Collaborative information retrieval environment: Integration of information retrieval with group support systems. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii Conference on System Sciences. Available: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/archive/00000435/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1991). CSCW: Four characters in search of a context. In J. Bowers & S. Benford (Eds.), Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design, 3–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (1995). Contested collaboration: A descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design. Information Processing and Management, 31(6), 859–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H., & Lievrouw, L. A. (1997). Collaboration during the design process: A case study of communication, information behavior, and project performance. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 179–204. London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H., McLaughlin, K. L., & Whitton, M. (2004). Designing to support situation awareness across distance: An example from a scientific collaboratory. Information Processing and Management, 40(3), 989–1011.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H., & Pierce, L. G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing and Management, 36(3), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spink, A., Wilson, T. D., Ford, N., Foster, A., & Ellis, D. (1999). Information-seeking and mediated searching. Part 1. Theoretical framework and research design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. R. (1966). On improving communication among scientists. Library Quarterly, 36(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talja, S. (1997). Constituting “Information” and “User” as research objects: A theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information Seeking in Context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 67–80. London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talja, S. (2002). Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. The New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3, 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talja, S. (2003). Supporting scholars’ collaboration in document seeking, retrieval and filtering. In H. Karasti, K. Baker, & G. Bowker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Supported Scientific Collaboration, 49–55. Eight European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Helsinki, Finland, September 2003. Oulu: University of Oulu, Department of Information Processing Science, Research Papers, A34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twidale, M. B., & Nichols, D. (1998a). Computer supported co-operative work in information search and retrieval. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 33:259–319. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twidale, M. B., & Nichols, D. M. (1998b). Designing interfaces to support collaboration in information retrieval. Interacting with Computers, 10(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twidale, M. B., Nichols, D. M., & Paice, C. D. (1997). Browsing is a collaborative process. Information Processing and Management, 33(6), 761–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D. (1999). Exploring models of information behavior: The “Uncertainty” project. Information Processing and Management, 35(6), 830–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Talja, S., Hansen, P. (2006). Information Sharing. In: Spink, A., Cole, C. (eds) New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3670-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3670-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3667-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3670-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics