Skip to main content

Are Civil Structural Engineers “Risk Averse”? Can Civionics Help?

  • Conference paper
Sensing Issues in Civil Structural Health Monitoring

Abstract

This paper discusses the reasons civil engineers have for being conservative in their design and argues that structural health monitoring will assist in providing data that could realistically be used to calibrate load and strength factors leading to more efficient and economical designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Melchers, R.E., Structural Reliability and Analysis Prediction, Ellis Horwood Ltd., (Division of John Wiley & Sons), UK, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nowak, A.S. and Collins, K.R., Reliability of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. OHBDC, Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, Ontario, Canada, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. (CHBDC) Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, Canadian Standard Association, Ontario, Canada, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bakht, B. and Jaeger, L.G., Bridge Testing — a surprise every time. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 115(5), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mufti, A.A. “Guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring”, Winnipeg, Manitoba: ISIS Canada, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. www.isiscanada.com, ISIS Canada Research Network Web Site, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mufti, A.A., “Integration of Sensing in Civil Engineering Structures: Development of the New Discipline of Civionics,” Proceedings for the First International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure (SHMII-1), November 13–15, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rivera, E., Mufti A.A. and Thomson, D., Civionics Specifications, Design Manual, ISIS Canada Research Network, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mufti, A.A., Bakht, B., Tadros, G., Horosko, A.T., Sparks, G. (2005). Are Civil Structural Engineers “Risk Averse”? Can Civionics Help?. In: Ansari, F. (eds) Sensing Issues in Civil Structural Health Monitoring. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3661-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3661-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3660-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3661-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics