Skip to main content

Evaluating the Educational Value of Molecular Structure Representations

  • Chapter
Visualization in Science Education

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 1))

Abstract

An investigation examined the value of various representations (e.g. concrete three-dimensional models, virtual computer models, static two-dimensional computer models, stereo-chemical formulas) in supporting the achievement by students of an effective perception of molecular structures. Additionally, the usefulness was studied of concrete three-dimensional models, virtual computer molecular models, and their combination, as help tools for students in solving spatial chemistry tasks involving three-dimensional perception, rotation and reflection. Altogether 477 students from secondary schools (age: 18–19 years) took part in the investigation. For purpose of the inquiry a set of four Molecular Visualization Tests was developed. Information about students` manner of thinking while solving spatial tasks was initially gained with a questionnaire and then examined in depth with a structured interview. The data was processed by methods suitable for the respective quantitative and qualitative approaches taken. The results suggest that the information sources which serve as a foundation for students’ perception of molecular structure decrease in value from concrete models, to virtual models, to static computer models. Students’ perception of three-dimensional structure was better when a stereo-chemical formula was used in comparison to that supported by a computer image. The results indicate that both molecular models types used as help-tools can ease the solving of chemistry tasks that require three-dimensional thinking. Virtual computer models seem to be as effective as concrete models, but the combined usage of both can cause splits in students’ attention and therefore seems to be less appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barke, H. D., & Wirbs, H. (2002). Structural units and chemical formulae. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(2), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, N. (1997). The use of computer-based analog models to improve visualization and chemical understanding. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Exploring Models and Modelling in Science and Technology Education (pp. 145–161). Reading: University of Reading, Faculty of Education and Community Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battino, R. (1983). Giant atomic and molecular models and other lecture demonstration devices designed for concrete operational students. Journal of Chemical Education, 60(6), 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birk, J. P., & Foster, J. (1989). Molecular models for the do-it-yourselfer. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(12), 1015–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning, D. R., & Cox, J. R. (2001). Teaching the structural nature of biological molecules: molecular visualization in the classroom and in the hands of students. Chemistry Education and Practice in Europe, 2(2), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, V. L. (1978). Inexpensive space-filling molecular models useful for VSPR and symmetry studies. Journal of Chemical Education, 55(12), 798–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comenius, J. A. (1896). Orbis sensualium pictus. Wien: Freytag. (Original work published 1658)

    Google Scholar 

  • Copolo, C. F., & Hounshell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(4), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology and Society, 4(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ealy, J. B. (1999). A student evaluation of molecular modeling in first year college chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggeton, G. L., Williamson, J. J., Lovesless C. E., & Grimes, B. C. (1990). Creative student-made molecular models. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(12), 1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferk, V., Vrtacnik, M., Blejec A. & Gril A. (2003). Students’ understanding of molecular structure representations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(10), 1227–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferk, V. (2003). The Significance of Different Kinds of Molecular Models in Teaching and Learning of Chemistry: Doctoral Dissertation. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Department of Chemical Education and Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D., & Sherwood, R. (1980). The effect of student manipulation of molecular models on chemistry achievement according to Piagetian level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(1), 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, M., & Howe, A. (1978). The use of concrete methods in secondary chemistry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(5), 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. M. (1995). Molecular origami: precision scale models from paper. Sausalito: University Science Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwicke, A. J. (1995). Using molecular models to teach chemistry. Part I: modelling molecules. School Science Review, 77(278), 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, R. T., Shaw, P. N., Jackson, D. E., & Woods, K. (1995). Integration of molecular modelling algorithms with tutorial instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(8), 699–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, A. O., Suess, H. M., & Beauducel A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur Test-Form 4: Handanweisung. Hogrefe: Verlag fuer Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, L. A. (1972) Stereoscopic projection in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 49(3), 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molitor, S., Ballstaedt, S. P., & Mandl, H. (1989). Problems in knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge aquisition from text und pictures (pp. 3–35), Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogacnik, V. (1998a). Test hitrosti percepcije ‘Vzorci’ (‘Patterns’ Test). Ljubljana: Center za psihodiagnosticna sredstva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogacnik, V. (1998b). Spacialni test ‘Rotacije’ (‘Rotations’ Test). Ljubljana: Center za psihodiagnosticna sredstva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogacnik, V. (1994). Test ‘Nizi’ (‘series’ Test). Ljubljana: Center za psihodiagnosticna sredstva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. M., & Traynham, J. G. (1976). Molecular geometry: as easy as blowing up balloons. Journal of Chemical Education, 53(4), 233–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. W, Kozma, R. B., Jones, T., & Wykoff, J. (1997). Use of simultaneous-synchronized macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teaching and learning of chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2000). Addressing student misconceptions concerning electron flow in aqueous solutions with instruction including computer animations and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 521–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, G. M., & Eniaiyeju, P. A. (1986). The understanding of pictorial depth cues, and the ability to visualise the rotation of three-dimensional structures in diagrams. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, G. M., & Moore, R.G. (1986). An unexpected effect in the use of models for teaching the visualization of rotation in molecular structures. European Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, G. M., & Shubber, K. E. (1985a). Learning the visualization of three-dimensional spatial relationships in diagrams at different ages in Bahrain. Research in Science and Technological Education, 3(2), 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, G. M., & Shubber, K. E. (1985b). The effects of colour in teaching the visualization of rotations in diagrams of three-dimensional structures. British Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckey, H., & Selvaratnam, M. (1991). Identification and rectification of students’ difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(6), 460–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 521–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamana, S. (1989). An easy constructed bicapped trigonal prism model. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(12), 1021–1022.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savec, V.F., Vrtacnik, M., Gilbert, J.K. (2005). Evaluating the Educational Value of Molecular Structure Representations. In: Gilbert, J.K. (eds) Visualization in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics