Skip to main content

Towards an Integrated Performance Indicator for (Energy) Benchmarking Covenants with Industry

  • Chapter
The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 43))

  • 1044 Accesses

Abstract

Voluntary approaches play an important role in reducing industrial energy use and CO2-emissions. Benchmarking can provide a starting point for negotiating targets, and are an added value to a monitoring program. Indicators are perfect for identifying the performance gaps, and to track performance over time. However, indicators at the firm level are still characterized by a low degree of standardization. Lack of comparability makes benchmarking very difficult. Indicators measure changes in one aspect (e.g. energy use) as if they were completely independent of changes in other aspects (e.g. waste generation). We argue that integrated indicators, based on micro-economic productivity theory, may one day assume the role of certified tools in the field of flexible policy instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  • Adriaanse A (1993), “Environmental Policy Performance Indicators”, SDV Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggeri, F. (2000), ”Resource development and monitoring issues Towards a contingency assessment of NA's”, paper for the Neapol Closing Conference Ghent 30/11–01/12/2000, Ecole des Mines de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altham W. (2001), “The Application of Benchmarking to Encourage the Adoption of Cleaner Production in the Drycleaning Industry”: paper presented at the 7th European Roundtable on Cleaner Production, Lund, Sweden, 2–4 May 2001, Centre of Excellence in Cleaner Production, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anite (1999), “A first set of eco-efficiency indicators for industry: Pilot study”, final report 13 December 1999, Anite Systems, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI/ISO 14031-1999: “Environmental management-Environmental performance evaluation — Guidelines”, Quality Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone G., Noci G., Manzini R., Welford R. and Young W. (1996), “Defining Environmental Performance Indicators: An Integrated Framework”, Business Strategy and The Environment, 5(1), pp.69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, V. E., Lovell, C. A. K., Nehring, R. F. and Somwaru, A. (1994). “Incorporating undesirable outputs into models of production: an application to U.S. agriculture”, Cahiers d'économie et sociologie rurales 31, pp. 60–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F. (coord.), Azzone G., Carlens J., Hertin J., Jasch C., Noci G., Olsthoorn X., Tyteca D., Van der Woerd F., Van Drunen M., Wagner M., Wehrmeyer W. and Wolf O. (2001), “MEPI — Measuring the Environmental Performance of Industry”, Final report, EC Environment and Climate Research Programme: Research Theme 4-Human Dimensions of Environmental Change-Contract No: ENV4-CT97-0655. February 2001. Web site: http://www.environmental-performance.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogan, C.E. and English, M.J. (1994), “Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation”, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp R. (1995), “Business Process Benchmarking: Finding and Implementing Best Practices”, ASCQ Quality Press, Milwaukee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A., Cooper W. and Rhodes E. (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (Eds.). (1995). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications. Boston: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidiak, M. (1999), “Voluntary Agreements for Energy Efficiency in Five EU Countries,” in Energy Efficiency and CO 2 Reduction: The Dimensions of Social Change, 1999 European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Summer Study, May 31–June 4, Mandelieu, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y.H., Färe R. and Grosskopf S. (1997), “Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach”, Journal of Environmental Management, 51, pp. 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and Tone, K. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couder J. and Verbruggen A. (2003), “Technical Efficiency Measures as a Tool for Energy Benchmarking in Industry?”, Energy and Environment, 14(5), pp. 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croci E. and Pesaro G. (1997), “Voluntary agreements in Italy: a new approach in environmental policy”, ENER BULLETIN, 20.97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croci E. and Pesaro G. (1999), “Voluntary Agreements in the Environmental Sector — The Italian Experience”, CAVA Working Paper no 98/11/5, January 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demming W.E. (1993), “The new economics for industry, government, and education”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Studies, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebäcker M. (2000), “Environmental and social benchmarking for industrial processes in developing countries: a pilot project for the textile industry in India, Indonesia and Zimbabwe”, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(7), 2000, pp. 491–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft (1997), “The Department of the Navy Benchmarking Handbook: A Systems View”, Department of the Navy Total Quality Leadership Office (TQLO), Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1997), “Environmental Agreements, Environmental Effectiveness”, Environmental Issues series, 1(3), European Environment Agency (EEA), Copenhagen, July 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (1999), “Environmental indicators: typology and overview”, Technical report No 25, European Environment Agency. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R., Grosskopf S. and Hernandez-Sancho F. (2000), “Environmental Performance: An Index Number Approach”, Department of Economics Working Paper, Oregon State University, Corvallis, revised, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R., Grosskopf S. and Pasurka C.A. (2001), “Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth”, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 381–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin G.C. (1996), “Environmental and Sustainability Indicators and the Concept of Situational Indicators. A Systems Approach”, In: Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 1, pp. 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín G.C. (1997), “Indicators and their use: information for decision making”, in Moldan B. and Billharz S. (Eds), Sustainability Indicators. Report on the project on Indicators of Sustainable Development, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler E. (1999), “The metrics of technology evaluation: where we stand and where we should go from here”, Stuart Working Paper 99-03, presented at the 24th Annual Technology Transfer Society Meeting, July 15–17, 1999. Stuart Graduate School of Business, Illinois Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrits R. and Oudshoff B. (2003), “Energy efficiency through Long-term agreements; Broadening the horizon in the new LTA approach”, in: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy. Proceedings 2003 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Industry. ACEEE, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2002a), “Sustainability Reporting Guidelines”, Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2002b), “Energy Protocol For use with the GRI 2002 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines”, Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg E. Bryant D., and Woodward, R. (1995), “Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development” World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 43 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen K., Johannsen K.S.and Larsen A. (2002): “Recommendations for Negotiated Agreements”, Government and Policy-Environment and Planning, 20(1), pp.19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higley C.J., Convery F. and Lévêque F. (2001), “1. Voluntary Approaches: An Introduction”, in Environmental Voluntary Approaches: Research Insights for Policy-Makers (Higley C.J. and Lévêque F. editors), presented at the International Policy Workshop on the Use of Voluntary Approaches at the Centre Borchette, Brussels, on 1 February, 2001, Centre d'économie industrielle Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (CERNA), May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keffer C., Shimp R. and Lehni M. (1999), “Eco-Efficiency Indicators & Reporting. Report on the Status of the Project's Work in Progress and Guideline for Pilot Application”, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Geneva, April 6, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krarup S. (2001), “4. Can Voluntary Approaches be Environmentally Effective and Economically Efficient?, in Environmental Voluntary Approaches: Research Insights for Policy-Makers (Higley C.J. and Lévêque F. editors), presented at the International Policy Workshop on the Use of Voluntary Approaches at the Centre Borchette, Brussels, on 1 February, 2001, Centre d'économie industrielle Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (CERNA), May 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Krarup, S. and Ramesohl S. (2000), “Voluntary Agreements in Energy Policy — Implementation and Efficiency”, The final report from the project Voluntary Agreements Implementation and Efficiency. AKF Forlaget, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller K. And Sturm A. (2001), “Standardized Eco-Efficiency Indicators”, Report 1: Concept paper, Revision: 1.0.5 / January 2001, Ellipson, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999), “Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: An Assessment”, edited by Börkey P., Glachant M. and Lévêque F., Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003), “OECD Environmental Indicators Development, Measurement and Use”, reference paper, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phylipsen G.J.M, Blok K. And Worrell E. (1998), “Handbook of International Comparisons of Energy Efficiency in the Manufacturing Industry”, Dept. of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri C., Dumanski J., Hamblin A. and Young A. (1995), “Land Quality Indicators”, World Bank Discussion Papers. No. 315. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby D., Howlett D. and Woodhouse Ph. (2000), “A Review of Indicators of Agricultural and Rural Livelihood Sustainability”, Sustainability Indicators for Natural Resource Management & Policy, Working Paper 1, February 2000. (website: http://les.man.ac.uk/jump/indicators.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard R.W. (1970), “Theory of Cost and Production Functions”, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard R.W. and Färe R. (1974), “Laws of Diminishing Returns”, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 34, pp. 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spendolini M.J. (1992), The Benchmarking Book, Amacom, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca D. (1996), “On The Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms — A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective”, Journal of Environmental Management, 46, pp. 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca D. (2001), “Economic and Business Indicators”, in Measuring the Environmental Performance of Industry (MEPI) Final Report — Appendices, Part II, Appendix 2: Environmental Performance Indicators: State-of-Art Reviews, February 2001. Web site: http://www.environmental-performance.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca D., Carlens J., Berkhout F., Hertin J., Wehrmeyer W. and Wagner M. (2002), “Corporate Environmental Performance Evaluation: Evidence From The Mepi Project”, Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN CSD (1996), “Indicators of Sustainable Development Framework and Methodologies” United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, New York. (Website: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/isd.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verfaillie H.A. and Bidwell R. (2000), “Measuring eco-efficiency, a guide to reporting company performance”, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Conches-Geneva, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • VNCI (2001), “The ‘EPI-method’ (version 1.1)”, Environmenal Performance Indicators for the Chemical Industry, Guideline, Association of the Dutch Chemical Industry (VNCI), Leidschendam, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M. and Wehrmeyer W. (2001), “Physical Indicators”, in Measuring the Environmental Performance of Industry (MEPI) Final Report — Appendices, Part II, Appendix 2: Environmental Performance Indicators: State-of-Art Reviews, February 2001. Web site: http://www.environmental-performance.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaisawarng, S and Klein, J. D. (1994), “The effects of sulfur dioxide controls on productivity change in the U.S electric power industry”, Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Couder, J., Verbruggen, A. (2005). Towards an Integrated Performance Indicator for (Energy) Benchmarking Covenants with Industry. In: Croci, E. (eds) The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Environment & Policy, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3356-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics