Skip to main content

Introducing Perspectives on Aspect

  • Chapter
Perspectives on Aspect

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 32))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  • Andersen, R.W. (1990). Papiamentu tense-aspect, with special attention to discourse. In J.V. Singler (Ed.), Pidgin and Creole Tense-Mood-Aspect Systems (pp.59ā€“96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5ā€“16.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159ā€“219.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bennett, M., & Partee, B. (1978). Towards the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Benthem, J. (1983). The Logic of Time. A Model-Theoretic Investigation into the Varieties of Temporal Ontology and Temporal Discourse. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in f child language. Language, 56, 386ā€“412.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Boogaart, R. (1999). Aspect and Temporal Ordering. A Contrastive Analysis of Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Borer, H. (1994). The projection of arguments. In E. Benedicto & J. Runner, (Eds.), Functional Projections, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17 (pp.19ā€“47). Amherst: GSLA.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Borik, O. (2002). Aspect and Reference time. PhD dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bronckart, J.-P., & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition, 2, 107ā€“130.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Davidson, D. (1980). The logical form of action sentences. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Essays on Actions and Events (pp.105ā€“148). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Depraetere, I. (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 1ā€“18.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dowty, D. (1972). Studies in the Logic of Verb Aspect and Time Reference in English. PhD dissertation, University of Austin, Texas.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montagueā€™s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dowty, D. (1982). Tenses, time adverbs and compositional semantic theory. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 23ā€“55.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Green, L. J. (1993). Topics in African American English: The Verb System Analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published in (1976) as Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Heny, F. (1982). Tense, aspect and time adverbials. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 109ā€“154.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Higginbotham, J. (2000). On events in linguistic semantics. In J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, & A.C. Varzi (Eds.), Speaking of Events (pp.49ā€“79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hinrichs, E. (1981). Temporale Anaphora im Englischen. MA thesis, University of TĆ¼bingen.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hinrichs, E. (1986). A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Hout, A. (1996). Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and its Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University. Published by Garland, New York, 1998.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Hout, A. (1998). On the role of direct objects and particles in learning telicity in Dutch and English. In A. Greenhill et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of 22 BUCLD (pp.397ā€“408). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Hout, A. (2000). Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface: Verb frame alternations in Dutch and their acquisition. In C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as grammatical objects (pp. 239ā€“282). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Hout, A. (in press a). Acquiring telicity cross-linguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • van Hout, A. (in press b). Imperfect imperfectives: On the acquisition of aspect in Polish. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabacova (Eds.), Aspectual Inquiries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Jacobsohn, H. (1933). Aspektfragen. Indogermanische Forschungen, 51, 292ā€“318.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • KabakƧiev, K. (2000). Aspect in English. A ā€œCommon-Senseā€ View of the Interplay between Verbal and Nominal Referents. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kamp, H. (1979). Events, instants and temporal reference. In R. BaĆ¼erle, U. Egli & A. Von Stechow (Eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View (pp.376ā€“416). Berlin: Springer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kamp, H. (1980). Some remarks on the logic of change. In C. Rohrer (Ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers (pp.135ā€“179). TĆ¼bingen: Niemeyer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kamp, H., & Rohrer, C. (1983). Tense in texts. In R. BƤuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. Von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language (pp.250ā€“269). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kazanina, N., & Phillips, C. (2003). Russian childrenā€™s knowledge of aspectual distinctions. In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (Eds.), BUCLD 27 Proceedings (pp.390ā€“401). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kearns, K. S. (1991). The Semantics of the English Progressive. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kipka, P. (1990). Slavic Aspect and Its Implications. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Klipple, E.M. (1995). The Aspectual Nature of Thematic Relations: Locative and Temporal Phrases in English and Chinese. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Krifka, M. (1989a). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas, Semantics and Contextual Expression (pp.75ā€“115). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Krifka, M. (1989b). Nominalreferenze und Zeitkonstitution. Studien zur Theoretischen Linguistik, Vol. 10. Muenchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Landman, F. (1989). Groups i & ii. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 559ā€“605 and 723ā€“744.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Landman, F. (1991). Structures for Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lascarides, A., & Asher, N. (1993). Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 437ā€“493.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lewis, D. (1972). General semantics. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of Natural Language (pp.169ā€“218). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice theoretical approach. In R. BƤuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language (pp.303ā€“323). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ter Meulen, A. (1980). Substances, Quantities and Individuals. A Study in the Formal Semantics of Mass Terms. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ter Meulen, A. (1985). Homogeneous and individuated quantifiers in natural language. In P. Weingartner & G. Dorn (Eds.), Foundations of Logic and Linguistics (pp.543ā€“562). New York: Plenum.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Młynarczyk, A. (2004). Aspectual Pairing in Polish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1987). Temporal ontology in natural language. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.1ā€“7). Stanford University, July 1987.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Moltmann, F. (1991). Measure adverbials. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 629ā€“660.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Montague, R. (1974). Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. Edited by and with an introduction by Richmond H. Thomason.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1978). Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2, 415ā€“434.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Musan, R. (1995). On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Olsen, M., & Weinberg, A. (1999). Innateness and the acquisition of grammatical aspect via lexical aspect. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (Eds.), BUCLD 23 Proceedings (pp.529ā€“540). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Partee, B. H. (1975). Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 6, 203ā€“300.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Poutsma, H. (1926). A Grammar of Late Modern English. II. The Parts of Speech. Groningen: Noordhoff.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Pratt, I., & Francez, N. (2001). Temporal prepositions and temporal generalized quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 187ā€“222.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Prior, A. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Richards, B. (1982). Tense, aspect and time adverbials. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 59ā€“107.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schulz, P., & Wittek, A. (2003). Opening doors and sweeping floors: What children with specific language impairment know about telic and atelic verbs. In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (Eds.), BUCLD 27 Proceedings (pp.727ā€“738). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R.W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743ā€“762.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Slabacova, R. (2001). Telicity in the Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Smith, C. (1991). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stoll, S. (1998). The role of lexical Aktionsart for the acquisition of Russian aspect. First Language, 18, 351ā€“378.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • de Swart, H. (1991). Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen. Published by Garland, New York, 1993.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • de Swart, H. (1998). Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 347ā€“385.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Taylor, B. (1977). Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 199ā€“220.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tenny, C. L. (1987). Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Tenny, C. L. (1994). Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Terry, J. M. (2004). On the articulation of aspectual meaning in African-American English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Verkuyl, H. J. (1972). On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Verkuyl, H. J. (1976). Interpretive rules and the description of the aspects. Foundations of Language, 14, 471ā€“503.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A Theory of Aspectuality. The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vinnitskaya, I., & Wexler, K. (2001). The role of pragmatics in the development of Russian aspect. First Language, 21, 143ā€“186.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vlach, F. (1981). The semantics of the progressive. In P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Tense and Aspect: Syntax and Semantics 14 (pp.271ā€“292). New York: Academic Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28, 661ā€“681.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weist, R., Wysocka, H., & Lyytinen, P. (1991). The interaction of language and thought in childrenā€™s language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 18, 67ā€“92.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Zucchi, A. (1989). The Language of Propositions and Events: Issues in the Syntax and the Semantics of Nominalization. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Hout, A., de Swart, H., Verkuyl, H.J. (2005). Introducing Perspectives on Aspect. In: Verkuyl, H.J., de Swart, H., van Hout, A. (eds) Perspectives on Aspect. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 32. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics