Skip to main content

The Trouble with Newton in the Eighteenth Century

  • Chapter
Newton and Newtonianism

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf., for example, Henry Guerlac, “Where the Statue Stood: Divergent Loyalties to Newton in the Eighteenth Century,” in Earl R. Wasserman, ed., Aspects of the Eighteenth Century (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965), pp. 317–34, and B. J. T. Dobbs, The Janus Faces of Genius. The Role of Alchemy in Newton’s Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paolo Frisi, “Eulogy of Sir Isaac Newton,” in A. Rupert Hall, Isaac Newton. Eighteenth-century Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard de Fontenelle, “Eloge de Newton,” in Oeuvres completes, ed. G-B. Depping (Paris, 1818, repr. Geneve, 1968), t. 1, p. 402. See also, A. Rupert Hall, Isaac Newton, p. 73; and John Conduitt, “The Memoir of Newton,” King’s College MSS, 129.23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in Hall, Isaac Newton, p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmond Turnor, Collections for the History of the Town and Soke of Grantham (London, 1806), p. 163, quoted in Hall, Isaac Newton, p. 20. This is verbatim from Conduitt’s manuscript drafts of Newton’s life; see, King’s MSS, 129 (3), fol. 3 and 129 (15).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bernard de Fontenelle, “Eloge de Newton,” in Oeuvres complètes, t. 1, p. 402.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. K. Webb, “The emergence of Rational Dissent,” in Knud Haakonssen, ed. Enlightenment and Religion. Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Larry Stewart, “Seeing through the Scholium: Religion and Reading Newton in the Eighteenth Century,” History of Science 34 (1996), pp. 123–65; and Stephen D. Snobelen, “‘God of gods and Lord of lords’: The Theology of Isaac Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia,” in John Hedley Brooke, Margaret J. Osler, and Jitse M. van der Meer, eds, Science in Theistic Contexts. Cognitive Dimensions, Osiris 16 (2001), pp. 169–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Karin Knorr-Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 26ff.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Llight, Based on the 4th ed., London, 1730 (New York: Dover Publications, 1952), pp. 405–6. Query 31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conduitt, “Account of Newton’s Life and Work at Cambridge,” King’s MSS, 130 (4). Typescript, pp. 7 and 17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. William Whiston, A New Theory of the Earth (London. 1696; repr. New York, 1978), pp. 63, 50. I wish to thank my graduate student, Mr. Jeff Wigglesworth, for bringing this to my attention.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leicestershire Record Office, Barker MSS, fol. 138. Jackson to Whiston, November 13, 1742.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, eds. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Freke, A Treatise on the Nature and Property of Fire. In Three Essays. I. Shewing the Cause of Vitality, and Muscular Motion; with many other Phaenomena. II. On Electricity. III. Shewing the Mechanical Cause of Magnetism; and why the Compass varies in the Manner it does (London, 1752), Appendix, pp. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freke, A Treatise on the Nature and Property of Fire, p. iii. On Freke, see Robert E. Schofield, Mechanism and Materialism. British Natural Philosophy in An Age of Reason (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), pp. 159–60; and Simon Schaffer, “The Consuming Flame: Electrical Showmen and Tory Mystics in the World of Goods,” in John Brewer and Roy Porter, eds., Consumption and the World of Goods (London and New York: Routledge, 1993), pp. 490, 495–8, 501–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freke, A Treatise on the Nature and Property of Fire, pp.140–1; also J. L. Heilbron, Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979), 294–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Conduitt, “Newton’s Character,” King’s College, MSS, 130 (7). 2; “Account of Newton’s Life at Cambridge,” typescript. King’s College, MSS, 130 (4). 16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Conduitt, “Newton’s Manual Dexterity,” King’s College, MSS, 130 (9).1. sss

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. Larry Stewart, “Philosophers in the Counting-houses: Commerce, Coffee-houses and Experiment in Early Modern London,” in Patrick O’Brien, Derek Keene, Marjolein’ t Hart, and Herman van der Wee, eds, Urban Achievement in Early Modern Europe. Golden Ages in Antwerp, Amsterdam and London (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 326–45, esp. p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  21. George Horne, M.A. Fellow of Magdalen College in Oxford. A Fair, Candid, and Impartial State of the Case Between Sir Isaac Newton and Mr. Hutchinson. In Which Is Shewn, How far a system of PHYSICS is capable of MATHEMATICAL DEMONSTRATION; how far Sir Isaac’s, as such a system, has that DEMONSTRATION; and consequently, what regard Mr. HUTCHINSON’S claim may deserve to have paid it (Oxford, Printed at the Theatre for S. Parker, Bookseller: and Sold by R. Baldwyn, in London; and Mess. Merrill, and Matthews, in Cambridge, 1753), pp. 42, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Conduitt, “Newton’s Manual Dexterity,” King’s College, MSS. 130(9). 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Horne, A Fair, Candid, and Impartial State of the Case, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 55. My italics.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quoted in Nigel Aston, “Horne and Heterodoxy: The Defence of Anglican Beliefs in the Late Enlightenment,” English Historical Review 108 (October, 1993), pp. 895–919; esp. pp. 896, 899.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reverend William Jones, Late of University College in Oxford; and Author of The Catholic Doctrine of the Trinity, An Essay On the First Principles of Natural Philosophy: Wherein The Use of Natural Means, or Second Causes, in the Oeconomy of the material World, is demonstrated from Reason, Experiments of various Kinds, and the Testimony of Antiquity (Oxford printed, And Dublin re-printed for William Watson, Bookseller, at the Poets Heads, in Capel-street, 1768), pp. 12, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Quoted in Hall, Isaac Newton, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Richard Symes, Fire Analysed; OR, The several Parts of which it is compounded Clearly Demonstrated By Experiments (Bristol, 1771), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Symes, Fire Analysed, pp. 45–6. My italics; See Schaffer, “The Consuming Flame: Electrical Showmen and Tory Mystics in the World of Goods,” pp. 491, and 507.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mary Poovey, A History of the Modern Fact. Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 187, and 223.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richard Symes, Fire Analysed, pp. 17–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., pp. 35, and 45.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. J. C. D. Clarke (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001), p. 238. On Burke see Maurice Crosland, “The Image of Science as a Threat: Burke versus Priestley and the ‘Philosophic Revolution’,” British Journal for the History of Science 20 (July, 1987), pp. 277–307, esp. p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Quoted in Dan Eshet, “Rereading Priestley: Science at the Intersection of Theology and Politics,” History of Science 39 (June, 2001), pp. 127–59, esp. p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Larry Stewart, “A Meaning for Machines: Modernity, Utility, and the Eighteenth-Century British Public,” Journal of Modern History 70 (June, 1998), pp. 259–96, esp. pp. 275–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cf. John Harris, Industrial Espionage and Technology Transfer. Britain and France in the Eighteenth Century (Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 1998), and Liliane Hilaire-Perez, Ľinvention technique au siécle des lumiéres (Paris: Albin Michel, 2000.)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Birmingham Central Library (hereafter BCL), James Watt Papers, 6/36/37. James Watt to Josiah Wedgwood, January 28, 1784.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Burke, Letter to Noble Lord, quoted in Crosland, “The Image of Science as a Threat,” p. 295, n. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  40. William Jones, M. A., F. R. S., Memoirs of the Life, Studies, and Writings of the Right Reverend George Horne, D. D. Late Bishop of Norwich (London, 1795), pp. 31–2 & n.

    Google Scholar 

  41. C. B. Wilde, “Hutchinsonianism, Natural Philosophy and Religious Controversy in Eighteenth Century Britain,” History of Science 18 (March, 1980), pp. 1–24, esp. p. 11; and John Gascoigne, Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jones, Memoirs of the Life, Studies, and Writings of the Right Reverend George Horne, p. 32; quoted in Gascoigne, Cambridge in the Age of Enlightenment, p. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jones, Memoirs of the Life, Studies, and Writings of the Right Reverend George Horne, pp. 36–7. My italics.

    Google Scholar 

  44. BCL, JWP 4/65/21. James Lind to Watt, February 20, 1795.

    Google Scholar 

  45. BCL, JWP, W/9/7. Thomas Beddoes to Watt, 21 April (?).

    Google Scholar 

  46. BCL, JWP, 4/65/19. James Watt to Thomas Percival, November 24, 1794.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, L. (2004). The Trouble with Newton in the Eighteenth Century. In: Force, J.E., Hutton, S. (eds) Newton and Newtonianism. International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives internationales d’histoire des idées, vol 188. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2238-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2238-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1969-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2238-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics