Skip to main content

2D Shape Modeling using Skeletal Graphs in a Morse Theoretic Framework

  • Chapter
Statistics and Analysis of Shapes

Abstract

Topology and geometry are the attributes that uniquely define a shape. Two objects are said to have the same topological structure if one can be morphed into the other without tearing and gluing, whereas geometry describes the relative position of points on a surface. Existing shape descriptors pay little attention to the topology of shapes and instead operate on a smaller subset, where all shapes are assumed to have a genus of one. In this chapter, we will describe a novel 2D shape modeling method that keeps track of the topology of a shape in combination with its geometry for a robust shape representation. Using a Morse theoretic approach and the 3D shape modeling technique in [2] as an inspiration, we focus on representing planar shapes of arbitrary topology. The proposed approach extends existing modeling techniques in the sense that it encompasses a larger class of shapes.

In short, we represent a shape in the form of a topo-geometric graph, which encodes both of its attributes. We show that the model is rigid transformation invariant, and demonstrate that the original shape may be recovered from the model. While classification is beyond the scope of this chapter and hence not explicitly addressed, note that it may greatly benefit from such models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baloch SH, Krim H (2005) Flexible skew symmetric shape model: learning, classification and sampling, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Submitted, Under review.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baloch SH, Krim H, Kogan I, Zenkov D (2005) Topological-geometric shape model for object representation, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Submitted, Under review.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basri R, Costa L, Geiger D, Jacobs D (1998) Determining the similarity of deformable shapes, Vision Research, Vol. 38, pp. 2365–2385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Belongie S, Malik J, Puzicha J (2002) Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts, PAMI, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 509–522.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blum H (1967) A transformation for extracting new discriptors of shape, In: Whaten-Dunn (ed) Models for the Perception of Speech and Visual Forms, pp. 362–380, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cremers D, Kohlberger T, Schnörr C (2002) Nonlinear Shape Statistics in Mumford-Shah Based Segmentation, Proceedings 7th European Conference on Computer Vision, Denmark, Part II, pp. 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cremers D, Osher SJ, Soatto S (2004) Kernel Density Estimation and Intrinsic Alignment for Knowledge-Driven Segmentation: Teaching Level Sets to Walk, Pattern Recognition: Proceedings 26th DAGM Symposium, Tübingen, Germany, pp. 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grenander U (1978) Pattern analysis, Lectures in Pattern Theory, Vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiransakolwong N, Vu K, Hua KA, Lang SD (2004) Shape Recognition Based on the Medial Axis Approach, Proceedings of ICME’04, Taipei, Taiwan, June 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kégl B, Krzyzak A, Linder T, Zeger K (2000) Learning and design of principal curves, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kendall DG (1989) A survey of the statistical theory of shape, Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 87–99.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimia BB, Tannenbaum AR, Zucker SW (1995) Shapes, shocks and deformations, I: the components of shape and the reaction-diffusion space, International Jounal of Computer Vision, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 189–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leventon ME, Grimson WEL, Faugeras O (2000) Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours, Proceedings CVPR’00, Vol. 1, pp. 316–323.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu TL, Geiger D, Kohn RV (1998) Representation and Self-Similarity of Shapes, International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, India.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto Y (1997) An Introduction to Morse Theory, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milnor J (1963) Morse Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Osher S, Fedkiw RP (2001) Level set methods: an overview and some recent results, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 169, No. 2, pp. 463–502.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pelillo M, Siddiqi K, Zucker S (1999) Matching hierarchical structures using association graphs, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 1105–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sclaroff S, Pentland A (1995) Modal matching for correspondence and recognition, PAMI, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 545–561.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sebastian TB, Klein PN, Kimia BB (2004) Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 26, pp. 550–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siddiqi K, Shokoufandeh A, Dickinson S, Zucker S (1999) Shock graphs and shape matching, International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srivastava A, Joshi S, Mio W, Liu X (2005) Statistical shape analysis: clustering, learning, and testing, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 27, pp. 590–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai A, Yezzi A Jr, Wells W III, Tempany C, Tucker D, Fan A, Grimson WE, Willsky A (2001) Model-based curve evolution technique for image segmentation, Proceedings CVPR’01, Vol. 1, pp. 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ye J, Bresler Y, Moulin P (2003) Cramér-Rao bounds for parametric shape estimation in inverse problems, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 71–84.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu C, Prince JL (1998) Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 359–369.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu SC, Yuille AL (1996) FORMS: A flexible object recognition and modeling systems, International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu SC (1999) Embedding gestalt laws in Markov random fields, PAMI, Vol. 21, No. 11, pp. 1170–1187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baloch, S.H., Krim, H. (2006). 2D Shape Modeling using Skeletal Graphs in a Morse Theoretic Framework. In: Krim, H., Yezzi, A. (eds) Statistics and Analysis of Shapes. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4481-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics