Skip to main content

What Makes Sciences “Scientific?”

  • Chapter
Handbook of Sociological Theory

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baecker, D. (Ed.). (1999). Problems of form. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1969). Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen ueber die Grundfragen der Erkenntnis-kritik. Darmstadt, Germany: WB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M. (1988). Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: The core-set revisited. Social Studies of Science, 18, 725–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1993). The rationality of avoiding choice. Rationality and Society, 5, 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (1992). Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 597–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (1993). A sociological theory of scientific change. Social Forces, 71, 933–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (1996). The new wars of truth. Social Science Information, 35, 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (1997). A sociological theory of objectivity. Science Studies, 1, 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (2000). Against essentialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S., & Westervelt, S. (1996). Fraud and trust in science. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 39, 248–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S., & Spear, J. (1999). The social conditions of cumulation. American Sociologist, 30, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. J. (1984). Opening Pandora’s box. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1938/1977). Holzwege (pp. 75–113). Frankfurt, Germany: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1969). Zur Sache des Denkens. Tuebingen, Germany: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, N. (1996). The glory of van Gogh: An anthropology of admiration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1996). Beyond positivism and relativism. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, P (1963/1990). The threat and the glory. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 19, 52–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de Solla. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. van Ornam. (1964). From a logical point of view (pp. 20–46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth (pp. 21–34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1924). Probleme einer Soziologie des Wissens. In M. Scheler (Ed.), Versuche zu einer Soziologie des Wissens (pp. 5–146). Munich, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M. (1993). Culture and enchantment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1995). Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 289–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, J. H. (1999). The sociology of reductionism. PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, O. (1923/1993). Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. Munich, Germany: DTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. (1996). Reconfiguring truth. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1904/1982). Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 146–214). Tuebingen, Germany: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1919/1982). Gesammelte Aufsatze zur Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 582–613). Tuebingen, Germany: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. C. (1992). Identity and control: A structural theory of social action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, S. (2001). What Makes Sciences “Scientific?”. In: Turner, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-32458-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-36274-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics